I need only Assignment 1 from these. Please read it carefully there PowerPoint presentation also. I need it turnitin report. For last two orders I didn't get turnitin report.
P a g e 1 | 18 Assessment Details Unit Code and Title: SBM1300 Research Project Assessment Information Assessment Task Weighting Due Leng th ULO CLO Assessment 1 : Research Proposal Brief and Feasibility Proposal identifying a research area and its feasibility (reflection from industry representative) plus oral presentation 20% + 10% invigilated in-class assessment (5-7 mins) Week 4 1 November Presentation Weeks 4 and 5 1500 words ULO-1 ULO-2 CLO-1 CLO-2 Assessment 2: Literature Review and Conceptual Framework Literature Review, Rationale, Gaps, Conceptual Framework Research Methodology, Ethical issues plus oral presentation 20% + 10% invigilated in-class assessment (5-7 mins) Week 7 22 November Presentations Weeks 7 and 8 2000 words ULO-1 ULO-2 ULO-3 ULO-4 CLO-1 CLO-2 CLO-5 CLO-7 Assessment 3: Research Design: Rationale, Methodology, Proposed Data collection and Data Analysis; and Ethics considerations 20% Week 9 6 December 2000 words ULO-1 ULO-2 ULO-3 ULO-4 CLO-1 CLO-2 CLO-5 CLO-6 CLO-7 Assessment 4: Final Research Proposal and Presentation Written submission of final proposal and Viva-Voce presentation 20% invigilated in-class assessment (Viva-Voce) (20 mins) Week 12 23 December 4000 words ULO-1 ULO-2 ULO-3 ULO-4 ULO-5 CLO-1 CLO-2 CLO-5 CLO-6 CLO-7 CLO-10 P a g e 2 | 18 Assessment 1: Research Proposal Brief and Feasibility Due date: 1 November 2020 , W4 Group/individual: Individual Assignment Word count / Time provided: 1500 words Weighting: 30% - 20% written submission plus 10% presentation in W4,5 Unit Learning Outcomes: ULO-1ULO-2 Course Learning Outcomes: CLO-1CLO-2 Assignment Details: A Research Proposal Brief early in the semester is to receive feedback about the suitability of the topic so that it informs others of a proposed piece of research and its significance. This is the first stage of preparing a Research Proposal that could be used as part of an application to undertake a research degree or to apply for funding to conduct the study. The purpose of writing the Research Proposal Brief early in the semester is to receive feedback about the suitability of the topic, so that by the time you complete and present the Research Proposal (in Week 12), the final submission is of a standard that could be used to support an application for a research degree or for research funding. For this assignment, students are required to consult an Industry Representative / Consultant or other approved person (this may include an academic staff member), to discuss their research project’s significance and feasibility. They will therefore revise their proposal or research question on the basis of the feedback. This assignment has two assessable components: the submission of a written Research Proposal Brief and its Feasibility Report, in academic format (1500 words), and a viva –voce oral PowerPoint presentation (5-7 minutes). This assignment is aimed at ensuring that the research project is important, realistic and manageable, and that the research question is appropriate and can be answered with the proposed methodology. It is crucial that the students can complete the research tasks in a timely manner and apply the relevant project management and research tools and techniques. The research feasibility report takes the research brief proposal to the consultant and investigates the possible continuation of the project and its realistic execution for the given time period and availability of resources, as well as taking into consideration the student’s capacity to carry on with the research task. Students can use a Gantt chart to keep track of their schedule for all assigned assessment tasks, and therefore, minimize risks. The feasibility analysis may result in feedback that suggests changes to the research approach and these can be incorporated in the Research Proposal. The reflection on the feedback is important for demonstrating that the feedback has been considered and suggesting how it may be acted upon, for example, by reconsidering or revising the scope of the topic or research question or revising the methodology. This is equivalent to the acceptance of the project charter for which the students have studied in their course. This assessment is worth 30% of the total marks for SBM1300 and forms the basis of the Research Design due in week 9 and worth 20% of the total marks in the unit. Students develop the Research Proposal across the semester incorporating several individual assignment tasks. The first of these is the Research Proposal Brief and its Feasibility. lovly Highlight P a g e 3 | 18 For the Research Proposal Brief you need to prepare an outline of your proposed research topic and research plan using the template below. The recommended lengths of each section are approximate, and will vary depending on the research question you are proposing to investigate and the methodology you are proposing to use in your research proposal. Contents Length (words) 1. Project Title: This is a brief descriptive summary of the proposed research topic. For ideas on how a project title should look, look at articles in Project Management journals such as the International Journal of Project Management< 50 words 2. research overview and justification: this is a brief summary of the research topic that describes the topic and why it is important for a research study to be conducted to investigate the topic 150 3. condensed literature review (at least three research-based sources). discuss the objectives, methodologies and findings of relevant previous research that provides a background for your research topic. the aim is to provide a critique of existing work and identify gaps in knowledge and / or methodological weaknesses in existing research. 250-300 4. research objectives, research question and sub-questions. linking back to sections (2) and (3), present and justify the question that your research project will be designed to answer. 150-200 5. methodology (which type- comparative, descriptive, action, ethnographic, explanatory, exploratory). think about how you would answer your research question (e.g., by reviewing trends in national / international statistics, by conducting a survey of consumers, by undertaking interviews with employers) and start to consider any advantages, disadvantages, materials needed or practical limitations of the methodology. this section is the most likely to change as you progress through the unit and learn about alternative ways of answering your research question. remember, this is hypothetical. you do not have to actually be able to carry out the study, but you need to think about what you would need to carry out a study to answer your research question. 150-200 6. significance of the research of the project. this is a final summary of all of the sections above ending with a statement of why it is important to conduct the research using the methodology proposed. 100-150 7. describe the role of the industry representative / consultant and their years working in the industry (do not identify the person by name) 50 8. summary of the questions presented to the industry representative / consultant based on the following main questions: * “please comment on the importance of this research topic for the industry?” * “please comment on how convincing you found the justification for the research?” * “please comment on the feasibility of the proposed methodology for answering the research question?” * “do you think the findings of a study like this can have industry applications?” na 9. summary of feedback / recommendations from industry representative / consultant organized by questions 250-300 p a g e 4 | 18 10. your reflection on the feedback / recommendations from part 3 above. how might you need to modify your research proposal to improve it in the areas of: * justifying the topic and question? * importance to industry? * feasibility? 250-300 11. references and resources: provide references to at least three research studies, government reports and/or industry reports using harvard referencing. please note, websites are not acceptable resources for the purpose of the assignment. na marking criteria and rubric: the assessment will be marked out of 100 and will be weighted 20% of the total unit mark marking criteria not satisfactory (0-49%) of the criterion mark) satisfactory (50-64%) of the criterion mark good (65-74%) of the criterion mark very good (75-84%) of the criterion mark excellent (85-100%) of the criterion mark logical structure and flow with a clear link between the specified problem and the proposed research. (10 marks) insufficient linking of the proposed research and the stated specific problem. acceptable linking of the proposed research with the stated specific problem. good linking of the proposed research with the stated specific problem. very good linking of the proposed research with the stated specific problem. excellent linking of the proposed research with the stated specific problem. proposed methodology the proposed methodology is likely to yield a satisfactory solution to the specified problem. (10 marks) the methodology is not likely to provide a satisfactory solution to the specified problem. the methodology is likely to provide a satisfactory solution to the specified problem. the methodology is most likely to provide a satisfactory solution to the specified problem. the methodology is highly probable to provide a satisfactory solution to the specified problem. the methodology is almost certain to provide a satisfactory solution to the specified problem. relevance of cited research latest relevant research is referred to in the report and the expected research findings are compared to past findings. (10 marks) the research referred to in the report is not the latest relevant research available and an acceptable comparison of the expected research findings to past findings is not provided. the research referred to in the report is the 50="" words="" 2.="" research="" overview="" and="" justification:="" this="" is="" a="" brief="" summary="" of="" the="" research="" topic="" that="" describes="" the="" topic="" and="" why="" it="" is="" important="" for="" a="" research="" study="" to="" be="" conducted="" to="" investigate="" the="" topic="" 150="" 3.="" condensed="" literature="" review="" (at="" least="" three="" research-based="" sources).="" discuss="" the="" objectives,="" methodologies="" and="" findings="" of="" relevant="" previous="" research="" that="" provides="" a="" background="" for="" your="" research="" topic.="" the="" aim="" is="" to="" provide="" a="" critique="" of="" existing="" work="" and="" identify="" gaps="" in="" knowledge="" and="" or="" methodological="" weaknesses="" in="" existing="" research.="" 250-300="" 4.="" research="" objectives,="" research="" question="" and="" sub-questions.="" linking="" back="" to="" sections="" (2)="" and="" (3),="" present="" and="" justify="" the="" question="" that="" your="" research="" project="" will="" be="" designed="" to="" answer.="" 150-200="" 5.="" methodology="" (which="" type-="" comparative,="" descriptive,="" action,="" ethnographic,="" explanatory,="" exploratory).="" think="" about="" how="" you="" would="" answer="" your="" research="" question="" (e.g.,="" by="" reviewing="" trends="" in="" national="" international="" statistics,="" by="" conducting="" a="" survey="" of="" consumers,="" by="" undertaking="" interviews="" with="" employers)="" and="" start="" to="" consider="" any="" advantages,="" disadvantages,="" materials="" needed="" or="" practical="" limitations="" of="" the="" methodology.="" this="" section="" is="" the="" most="" likely="" to="" change="" as="" you="" progress="" through="" the="" unit="" and="" learn="" about="" alternative="" ways="" of="" answering="" your="" research="" question.="" remember,="" this="" is="" hypothetical.="" you="" do="" not="" have="" to="" actually="" be="" able="" to="" carry="" out="" the="" study,="" but="" you="" need="" to="" think="" about="" what="" you="" would="" need="" to="" carry="" out="" a="" study="" to="" answer="" your="" research="" question.="" 150-200="" 6.="" significance="" of="" the="" research="" of="" the="" project.="" this="" is="" a="" final="" summary="" of="" all="" of="" the="" sections="" above="" ending="" with="" a="" statement="" of="" why="" it="" is="" important="" to="" conduct="" the="" research="" using="" the="" methodology="" proposed.="" 100-150="" 7.="" describe="" the="" role="" of="" the="" industry="" representative="" consultant="" and="" their="" years="" working="" in="" the="" industry="" (do="" not="" identify="" the="" person="" by="" name)="" 50="" 8.="" summary="" of="" the="" questions="" presented="" to="" the="" industry="" representative="" consultant="" based="" on="" the="" following="" main="" questions:="" *="" “please="" comment="" on="" the="" importance="" of="" this="" research="" topic="" for="" the="" industry?”="" *="" “please="" comment="" on="" how="" convincing="" you="" found="" the="" justification="" for="" the="" research?”="" *="" “please="" comment="" on="" the="" feasibility="" of="" the="" proposed="" methodology="" for="" answering="" the="" research="" question?”="" *="" “do="" you="" think="" the="" findings="" of="" a="" study="" like="" this="" can="" have="" industry="" applications?”="" na="" 9.="" summary="" of="" feedback="" recommendations="" from="" industry="" representative="" consultant="" organized="" by="" questions="" 250-300="" p="" a="" g="" e="" 4="" |="" 18="" 10.="" your="" reflection="" on="" the="" feedback="" recommendations="" from="" part="" 3="" above.="" how="" might="" you="" need="" to="" modify="" your="" research="" proposal="" to="" improve="" it="" in="" the="" areas="" of:="" *="" justifying="" the="" topic="" and="" question?="" *="" importance="" to="" industry?="" *="" feasibility?="" 250-300="" 11.="" references="" and="" resources:="" provide="" references="" to="" at="" least="" three="" research="" studies,="" government="" reports="" and/or="" industry="" reports="" using="" harvard="" referencing.="" please="" note,="" websites="" are="" not="" acceptable="" resources="" for="" the="" purpose="" of="" the="" assignment.="" na="" marking="" criteria="" and="" rubric:="" the="" assessment="" will="" be="" marked="" out="" of="" 100="" and="" will="" be="" weighted="" 20%="" of="" the="" total="" unit="" mark="" marking="" criteria="" not="" satisfactory="" (0-49%)="" of="" the="" criterion="" mark)="" satisfactory="" (50-64%)="" of="" the="" criterion="" mark="" good="" (65-74%)="" of="" the="" criterion="" mark="" very="" good="" (75-84%)="" of="" the="" criterion="" mark="" excellent="" (85-100%)="" of="" the="" criterion="" mark="" logical="" structure="" and="" flow="" with="" a="" clear="" link="" between="" the="" specified="" problem="" and="" the="" proposed="" research.="" (10="" marks)="" insufficient="" linking="" of="" the="" proposed="" research="" and="" the="" stated="" specific="" problem.="" acceptable="" linking="" of="" the="" proposed="" research="" with="" the="" stated="" specific="" problem.="" good="" linking="" of="" the="" proposed="" research="" with="" the="" stated="" specific="" problem.="" very="" good="" linking="" of="" the="" proposed="" research="" with="" the="" stated="" specific="" problem.="" excellent="" linking="" of="" the="" proposed="" research="" with="" the="" stated="" specific="" problem.="" proposed="" methodology="" the="" proposed="" methodology="" is="" likely="" to="" yield="" a="" satisfactory="" solution="" to="" the="" specified="" problem.="" (10="" marks)="" the="" methodology="" is="" not="" likely="" to="" provide="" a="" satisfactory="" solution="" to="" the="" specified="" problem.="" the="" methodology="" is="" likely="" to="" provide="" a="" satisfactory="" solution="" to="" the="" specified="" problem.="" the="" methodology="" is="" most="" likely="" to="" provide="" a="" satisfactory="" solution="" to="" the="" specified="" problem.="" the="" methodology="" is="" highly="" probable="" to="" provide="" a="" satisfactory="" solution="" to="" the="" specified="" problem.="" the="" methodology="" is="" almost="" certain="" to="" provide="" a="" satisfactory="" solution="" to="" the="" specified="" problem.="" relevance="" of="" cited="" research="" latest="" relevant="" research="" is="" referred="" to="" in="" the="" report="" and="" the="" expected="" research="" findings="" are="" compared="" to="" past="" findings.="" (10="" marks)="" the="" research="" referred="" to="" in="" the="" report="" is="" not="" the="" latest="" relevant="" research="" available="" and="" an="" acceptable="" comparison="" of="" the="" expected="" research="" findings="" to="" past="" findings="" is="" not="" provided.="" the="" research="" referred="" to="" in="" the="" report="" is=""> 50 words 2. research overview and justification: this is a brief summary of the research topic that describes the topic and why it is important for a research study to be conducted to investigate the topic 150 3. condensed literature review (at least three research-based sources). discuss the objectives, methodologies and findings of relevant previous research that provides a background for your research topic. the aim is to provide a critique of existing work and identify gaps in knowledge and / or methodological weaknesses in existing research. 250-300 4. research objectives, research question and sub-questions. linking back to sections (2) and (3), present and justify the question that your research project will be designed to answer. 150-200 5. methodology (which type- comparative, descriptive, action, ethnographic, explanatory, exploratory). think about how you would answer your research question (e.g., by reviewing trends in national / international statistics, by conducting a survey of consumers, by undertaking interviews with employers) and start to consider any advantages, disadvantages, materials needed or practical limitations of the methodology. this section is the most likely to change as you progress through the unit and learn about alternative ways of answering your research question. remember, this is hypothetical. you do not have to actually be able to carry out the study, but you need to think about what you would need to carry out a study to answer your research question. 150-200 6. significance of the research of the project. this is a final summary of all of the sections above ending with a statement of why it is important to conduct the research using the methodology proposed. 100-150 7. describe the role of the industry representative / consultant and their years working in the industry (do not identify the person by name) 50 8. summary of the questions presented to the industry representative / consultant based on the following main questions: * “please comment on the importance of this research topic for the industry?” * “please comment on how convincing you found the justification for the research?” * “please comment on the feasibility of the proposed methodology for answering the research question?” * “do you think the findings of a study like this can have industry applications?” na 9. summary of feedback / recommendations from industry representative / consultant organized by questions 250-300 p a g e 4 | 18 10. your reflection on the feedback / recommendations from part 3 above. how might you need to modify your research proposal to improve it in the areas of: * justifying the topic and question? * importance to industry? * feasibility? 250-300 11. references and resources: provide references to at least three research studies, government reports and/or industry reports using harvard referencing. please note, websites are not acceptable resources for the purpose of the assignment. na marking criteria and rubric: the assessment will be marked out of 100 and will be weighted 20% of the total unit mark marking criteria not satisfactory (0-49%) of the criterion mark) satisfactory (50-64%) of the criterion mark good (65-74%) of the criterion mark very good (75-84%) of the criterion mark excellent (85-100%) of the criterion mark logical structure and flow with a clear link between the specified problem and the proposed research. (10 marks) insufficient linking of the proposed research and the stated specific problem. acceptable linking of the proposed research with the stated specific problem. good linking of the proposed research with the stated specific problem. very good linking of the proposed research with the stated specific problem. excellent linking of the proposed research with the stated specific problem. proposed methodology the proposed methodology is likely to yield a satisfactory solution to the specified problem. (10 marks) the methodology is not likely to provide a satisfactory solution to the specified problem. the methodology is likely to provide a satisfactory solution to the specified problem. the methodology is most likely to provide a satisfactory solution to the specified problem. the methodology is highly probable to provide a satisfactory solution to the specified problem. the methodology is almost certain to provide a satisfactory solution to the specified problem. relevance of cited research latest relevant research is referred to in the report and the expected research findings are compared to past findings. (10 marks) the research referred to in the report is not the latest relevant research available and an acceptable comparison of the expected research findings to past findings is not provided. the research referred to in the report is the>