i need 8 slides with speaker notes and should be good as my last experience with you guys have cost...

Question

i need 8 slides with speaker notes and should be good as my last experience with you guys have cost me 5000$ so want it perfect pleaseSome Rubric 	Some Rubric 	Criteria 	Ratings 	Pts 	This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeDesign and delivery 		5 Pts Excellent Delivery of presentation is excellent and engaging. Content is relevant, interesting and the presenters bring excellent insight and interpretation. Visual aids are excellent and engaging and timing is adhered to. All group members presented. 	3.75 Pts Good Delivery of presentation is clear and relatively engaging. Content is relevant, and presenters bring good insight and interpretation. Visual aids are clear, engaging and timing is adhered to. All group members presented. 	2.5 Pts Satisfactory Delivery of presentation is mostly clear. Content is relevant. Visual aids are mostly clear, engaging and timing is adhered to. All group members presented. 	1.5 Pts Unsatisfactory Delivery of presentation may not be clear. Content may not be relevant. Visual aids are uninteresting or poorly developed. Timing not adhered to. Not all group members presented 	5 pts 	This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeDefining sustainability 		8 Pts Excellent Detailed and comprehensive discussion of set and additional literature on defining sustainability as it relates to the built environment. Discussion demonstrates logic and a clear understanding about what sustainability is, how it relates to the built environment and engages with the key debates around how to define. Discussion includes excellent critique of the literature. Brings out your definition of sustainability in relation to the built environment and supports why you chose this. If based upon existing definition, justifies why this is the best definition. 	6 Pts Good Detailed discussion of set and additional literature on defining sustainability as it relates to the built environment. Discussion is logical and includes good integration of the current debates around defining sustainability. Good level of critical understanding demonstrated. Discusses your definition and supports why you believe this to be the best definition. 	4 Pts Satisfactory Satisfactory discussion of set and some additional literature on defining sustainability as it relates to the built environment. May be some errors or issues with discussion of literature. Limited critique of the different definitions or their strengths/ limitations. Presents your definition of sustainability but may not link to built environment or be supported with evidence/literature. 	2 Pts Unsatisfactory Fragmented discussion of set literature on defining sustainability as it relates to the built environment. No critique of literature. Does not present own definition or presented definition is not clear or supported by evidence. 	8 pts 	This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeCase study 		8 Pts Excellent A case study of a best practice sustainable building or program to support improving performance in buildings is presented. Excellent and detailed description of the case study provided including key information about innovative sustainability elements or mechanisms. 	6 Pts Good A case study of a best practice sustainable building or program to support improving performance in buildings is presented. Good level of detail provided in the description of the case study provided. 	4 Pts Satisfactory A case study of a best practice sustainable building or program to support improving performance in buildings is presented. Satisfactory level of detail provided in the description of the case study provided although some key information missing. 	0 Pts Unsatisfactory No case study presented or case study presented is fragmented and not discussed in enough detail. 	8 pts 	This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeLinking case study to definition of sustainability 		5 Pts Excellent Comprehensive and critical discussion about how the case study achieves (or not) outcomes in comparison to your definition of sustainability. Excellent support of discussion by evidence. 	3.75 Pts Good Detailed discussion about how the case study achieves (or not) outcomes in comparison to your definition of sustainability. Good use of supporting evidence/references. 	2.5 Pts Satisfactory Discussion about how the case study achieves (or not) outcomes in comparison to your definition of sustainability. May be some information missing. Limited use of supporting evidence/references. 	1.5 Pts Unsatisfactory Fragmented or lack of discussion about how case study achieves (or not) outcomes in comparison to your definition of sustainability. No use of supporting evidence/references. 	5 pts 	This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeUse of additional references and evidence 		4 Pts Excellent Presentation engages with high quality literature and evidence. At least 5 additional references used with at least 2 of these to be high quality journal articles. These references are in addition to the 2 set journal articles. References formatted as per RMIT Harvard reference style requirements. 	3 Pts Good Presentation engages with good quality literature and evidence. At least 3 additional references used with at least 1 of these to be high quality journal article. These references are in addition to the 2 set journal articles. References formatted as per RMIT Harvard reference style requirements. 	2 Pts Satisfactory Presentation engages with literature and evidence. At least 2 additional references used with at least 1 of these to be a journal article. These references are in addition to the 2 set journal articles. References formatted as per RMIT Harvard reference style requirements but may be some formatting or style issues. 	1 Pts Unsatisfactory Presentation has limited engagement with additional literature or evidence. Presentation does not include at least 2 additional references and/or does not include at least 1 of these to be a journal article. These references are in addition to the 2 set journal articles. References are not formatted as per RMIT Harvard reference style requirements. 	4 pts 	Total points: 30   Microsoft Word - Assessment task 1 BUIL1225	Sustainability	in	the	Built	 Environment	–	Assessment	Task	1:	Case	studies	 (group	assessment)	   Due date:     In class presentation: Wednesday 17th March (week 3)  Presentation slides: Wednesday 17th March 6.30pm (i.e. before  presentations)    Assessment:     30% of the final mark for BUIL1225  Course Learning Outcomes: CLO1, CLO2, CLO3, CLO4, CLO5 (detailed descriptions below)  Marking criteria:  Assessment rubric (attached).  Submission:  Electronic submission of presentation slides (in PowerPoint of pdf format)  through Canvas, presentation delivered during week 3 class.  Output format:  Oral presentation and submission of presentation slides  Oral presentation will be conducted in front of the class (online) and two (2)  assessors. Presentations are to go for no more than 7 minutes. This timing  will be strictly enforced.  Presentation slides (e.g. PowerPoint) must be used. You need to submit  these slides (in pdf format) to Canvas prior to the class.  For help with putting together and delivering a high quality presentation,  visit the Study and Learning Centre or explore their online resources here:  https://emedia.rmit.edu.au/learninglab/content/oral‐presentations     Submission details:  Submit your final presentation as one pdf file through the link on the  BUIL1225 Canvas website. Only 1 member of your group needs to submit the  presentation file. Ensure that you include the authorisation statement “I  declare that in submitting all work for this assessment I have read,  understood and agree to the content and expectations of the Assessment  Declaration.”. More details on this declaration can be found here:  https://www.rmit.edu.au/students/student‐essentials/assessment‐and‐ exams/assessment/assessment‐declaration   File format:    *.pdf (To generate an Adobe PDF file, either save your file as PDF or print to  a PDF printer, such as “Cute PDF”.) or ppt.  Submission format:   Name your file as: Group number_Ass1_case studies.pdf  (e.g. group 1_Ass1_case studies.pdf)  Paper size: A4    Referencing style:   RMIT’s Harvard Style http://www.rmit.edu.au/library/referencing  This task is to be submitted in accordance with the University submissions policy. The policies  associated with requests for extension and special consideration can be found at the link below.  Please ask the course coordinator/program manager if you are in doubt regarding the policy.  https://www.rmit.edu.au/students/student‐essentials/assessment‐and‐exams   Submissions must be made by the due date and time. Late submissions without a granted  extension of time or special consideration are marked as zero.    The policies associated with requests for extension of time can be found at this link:  https://www.rmit.edu.au/students/student‐essentials/assessment‐and‐ exams/assessment/extensions‐of‐time‐for‐submission‐of‐assessable‐work. You can lodge  the Application for extension of time (up to seven days) with the Course Coordinator.    The policies associated with requests for special consideration can be found at this link:  https://www.rmit.edu.au/students/student‐essentials/assessment‐and‐ exams/assessment/special‐consideration. These applications will be assessed by specialist  staff.  Context	 As we explore throughout this course, the built environment has a significant negative impact on our  natural environment. Over recent decades there has been an increasing focus on how the built  environment can reduce the impact it has on our natural environment, and the role that more  sustainable buildings can play in a transition to a low carbon future. While there has been some  progress towards addressing key sustainability challenges in the built environment, we still face key  challenges in delivering more sustainable buildings. Part of the challenge remains that the concept of  sustainability is seen as hard to define and implement in practice. It is important that when you are  working in the sustainability field, that you can understand different people’s (e.g. clients, policy  makers etc.) views about sustainability. Not everyone you deal with will share the same definition or  values of sustainability as you. However, it is critical that you can articulate your definitions of  sustainability and identify examples which represent this.  This assessment task builds upon your week 1 and 2 content and discussions and requires you in  groups of three (3) to critique common definitions of sustainability as it relates to the built  environment. You will then put forward your definition of sustainable development (it may be one  you found in the literature or one you created/altered) and your reasons why you support that  definition over other definitions of sustainable development. You will then use a case study of an  actual building or program (government or non‐government) to demonstrate real world application  and explore how it links to your definition. The building or program can be from anywhere in the  world. You will present to the class in our week 3 face‐to‐face session (online). Depending on your  selected case study this assessment task addresses the Course Learning Outcomes 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5:  1. Identify the characteristics of best‐practice in sustainable building initiatives  2. Apply sustainability criteria to assess the performance of a building  3. Identify and analyse effective strategies for achieving sustainable buildings and sustainable  design outcomes  4. Critically analyse Australian sustainability policy and project initiatives  5. Evaluate and communicate the effectiveness of current sustainability initiatives and assess  whether these initiatives are operating in an effective sustainability framework  This assessment addresses the following Program Learning Outcomes 2 and 3:  2. Critically analyse, synthesise and reflect on sustainable building theory and recent  developments, both local and international, to extend and challenge knowledge and practice  3. Professionally communicate and justify sustainable building design principles, strategies,  solutions and/or outcomes, engaging effectively with diverse stakeholders, including across  the government and industry sectors  Task	description	 1. You will be organised into groups of three (3) by the course coordinator. This will be  organised by the end of the week 1 class.  2. Explore definitions of sustainable development and select (or create/edit) the definition of  sustainable development which you believe best matches your views given the current  global situation. As a starting point, read the two (2) articles provided on sustainable  development (see Reading List for Assessment Task 1) and conduct an annotated  bibliography for each article. See attached document for how to conduct an annotated  bibliography. Note: Conducting an annotated bibliography is to help you start to think more  critically about the articles and frame your discussion for your presentation. You do not have  to submit the actual annotated bibliography.  3. You are expected to draw upon wider literature and resources which have not been  provided in class to further support your discussion on defining sustainable development  and your case study (see below). You need to demonstrate you have used at least two (2)  other journal articles in your presentation and use the right reference format.  4. Select a case study of a real building which you believe demonstrates best practice  sustainable development outcomes or a program which helps to deliver improved  sustainability in the built environment (e.g. the Victorian Government’s solar panel rebate  scheme). The building or program you select will be your case study. You need to describe  the case (e.g. what is it, what is interesting about it, what it aims to do, who can access it)  and discuss how well it aligns with the criteria of sustainable development that you  introduced earlier in your presentation. If you need some ideas of possible case studies you  could present you can look for examples here:  World Green Building Council: https://www.worldgbc.org/case‐study‐library   Green Building Council of Australia: https://new.gbca.org.au/showcase/   Renew: https://renew.org.au/   5. You are to present your discussion of your definition of sustainable development and the  case study to the class during our week 3 class. Each group will be allotted 7 minutes  (maximum) to present. There will also be 2 minutes of question time by the lecturer and  other class members. Each group member must talk during the presentation. A suggested  format for the presentation will be provided in the week 1 class.  6. You must submit a copy of your presentation via the link on Canvas prior to the week 3 class.  This is so that there is a record of your presentation. If you do not submit your presentation  you will not be able to receive a mark. As this is a group task, make sure that someone in the  group is responsible for submitting a copy of the presentation. You must also make sure all  group member names and student numbers are on the first slide of your presentation.  Reference all your sources using the Harvard referencing style as described on the RMIT website:  http://www.rmit.edu.au/library/referencing  If you are unsure as to how to prepare and deliver your presentation, the following link provides  some useful guidance: https://emedia.rmit.edu.au/learninglab/content/oral‐presentations  Assessment	 This assessment task will be assessed in accordance with Table 1. The task is worth a total of 30  marks. If resources allow, there will be two lecturers who will assess your presentation, with an  average of the two marks given as your total mark.       Excellent  Good  Satisfactory  Unsatisfactory  Delivery and  design  Mark available: 5  Points: 5  Delivery of presentation is  excellent and engaging.  Content is relevant,  interesting and the  presenters bring excellent  insight and interpretation.  Visual aids are excellent  and engaging, and timing  is adhered to. All group  members presented.  Points: 3.75  Delivery of presentation is  clear and relatively  engaging. Content is  relevant, and presenters  bring good insight and  interpretation. Visual aids  are clear, engaging and  timing is adhered to. All  group members  presented.  Points: 2.5  Delivery of presentation is  mostly clear. Content is  relevant. Visual aids are  mostly clear, engaging and  timing is adhered to. All  group members  presented.     Points:

Shubham · Accepted Answer

Characteristics of best‐practice in sustainable building initiatives
Prefabricating material in a controlled environment
The construction includes the structure for a controlled environment that has the possibility for improving the quality of the University of Melbourne Fishermans Bend campus. It can help in decreasing the wastage for the building sites. It is the strategy that will help in saving material and time that can lead to higher profitability. 
Construction waste management
The reduction of waste is required for becoming more achievable. The project includes small footprints for handling material in a single container for making difference. 
Management of site for an improved environment
This will be used for preventing big deals and it required the development of the system. It is the best approach for using treated water for the site. It is the best approach that can be used for the treatment of water.
Lean Manufacturing for reducing energy
This required rethinking the construction approach for finding the wasteful activities. It includes organization and elimination of the wastage of resources. It saves time and it can help in eliminating damage and wasted time.
Sustainability criteria to assess the performance of a building
The BREEAM method is used for accessing the performance of the building and it includes the requirement that focuses on the interior of the building and immediate surroundings. The method is developed along with approaches for the analysis of the performance of the building. It is an approach that includes parameters that includes a scale for large and small impacts. The utilization of the method can help in indicating the best choice for design and material and construction.

Some Rubric Some Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeDesign and delivery 5 Pts Excellent Delivery of presentation is excellent and engaging. Content is relevant,...

Answer To: Some Rubric Some Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeDesign...

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers