I just need help with questions 2,3 and 4. I have already solved question 1.
Econ 201: Assignment #1 Fall 2022 Josh Boitnott Instructions: • Show your work if you want partial marks. Wrong answers with no work shown will receive a mark of 0. • I encourage you to work with others; however, you must submit your own version of the assignment. Further to that, I request that you not publicly post solutions for others to copy. • The answers need to be submitted through Crowdmark and are due by Oct. 14th at 11:59 pm. You will need to submit/upload your solutions through Crowdmark with the link initial link to the submission sent via e-mail by Crowdmark. • Please make sure to submit your answers in the correct position; we should be able to read your answers without having to rotate them. Finally, when capturing the image of your work, please make sure to have sufficient lighting and clarity of the images. 1. (14 marks) Suppose the market for laser pointers consists of 2 types of people: profes- sors and cat lovers. The professors have an individual demand of qProf = 13− 1 5 P and the cat lovers have an individual demand of qCat = 20− 1 2 P . (a) (4 marks) If there are 30 consumers with a demand of qProf and 8 consumers with a demand of qCat, then what is the (inverse) market demand curve P (Q D) (for all 38 people)? Illustrate it in a graph. (b) (4 marks) Suppose the (inverse) market supply curve is P = 1 15 QS, what is the market equilibrium outcome? (Hint: Both groups buy laser pointers and your quantity should be somewhere between 250 and 400.) What is the consumer and producer surplus in this case? (Reminder: Your consumer surplus will be ugly to calculate since the demand curve is discontinuous). (c) (6 marks) The government has become concerned about long term environmental harm from improper disposal of the laser pointers. To alleviate some of the burden, the government decides to impose a $7.50 excise tax on each laser pointer sold. What is the new equilibrium? How much has the government raised in tax revenue? How big is the dead weight loss? What is the tax incidence for the consumers? 2. (18 marks) Suppose you are told that a consumer has the following utility function: U(qx, qy) = e (qy) × √ 2qx − 1. Their income is Y , the price of good x is Px, and the price of good y is Py. (a) (3 marks) Show that the Marginal Rate of Substitution is the same for U(qx, qy) as the positive monotonic transformation W = ln(U(qx, qy)). What type of utility function is W (qx, qy)? (b) (4 marks) Find q∗x, the demand for good x, and q ∗ y , the demand for good y. Hint : be sure to include information about where the function works. (c) (7 marks) Suppose you are given Px = $2 and Py = $18, provide a sketch of of the income-consumption curve for Y = {20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45}. Be sure to label the points for each income and clearly indicate what is happening (i.e. values of qx and qy corresponding to each Y ). (d) (4 marks) Find the cross price elasticity of demand for q∗x and q ∗ y. Does this tell you anything about the relationship between the two goods? 3. (17 marks) This question is designed to examine how we can utilize our basic theory without having an explicit indifference curve. Suppose Lia has an income of Y = $500 and only consumes two good: memory sticks (to store free economics papers she downloads from the library) and hardcover novels (which she refuses to check out from the library). Furthermore, let the price of memory sticks be PS = $25 and the price of hardcover novels be PN = $20. (a) (5 marks) Create a graph of Lia’s behaviour with the assumption that her utility is consistent with our normal assumptions (e.g. ∂U/∂qi > 0 and ∂ 2U/∂q2i < 0 for i = {s,n}) assuming lia’s preferences would result in her purchasing 10 novels. what is the budget line? what is her real income in terms of memory sticks? (b) (4 marks) before lia makes any purchases, the place she purchases books from offers the following deal: any additional books purchased after the first 10 will get a 25% discount. use a revealed preferences argument to explain how we know lia will be better off. would this be true for all utility functions? explain why or why not. (c) (5 marks) another seller of books makes the following offer: get a 25% discount on orders of the first 10 books. create a graph of the new budget constraint. explain how this would adjust lia’s bundle with a reference to income and substitution effects (you do not have to give a specific bundle). assume that both goods are normal. (d) (3 marks) could lia be indifferent between the discount option in part (b) and (c)? explain why or why not. 4. (15 marks) read the chapter “homer economicus or homer sapiens?” by jodi beggs1. the chapter focuses on the idea of behavioural economics in the tv show the simp- sons. this question asks you to consider how our simple model of behaviour (i.e. u(qx, qy) subject to y = pxqx + pyqy) compares with both the world of homer simp- son and the real world. to answer this question and receive full marks, your response should be approximately two paragraphs (and no more than three). the main question to answer is “how does our simple model fail to capture some important behavioural aspects demonstrated in the television show the simpsons?” the focus should address the following three ideas/concepts: i) how does the assump- tion the people live one period limit the model, ii) how does our assumption that utility is ordinal limit modeling issues of altruism, and iii) how does our model neglect elements such as keeping up with the joneses2? hint : even though your answer needs to be written in sentences, it might be helpful to think about utility as ui(a, qi, qj) = w (a, qi) + v (qj) where a is all other goods than q, qi is consumption choice of good q for person i, and qj is: consumption choice of good q in the future, consumption choice of good q by others, or average consumption choice of good q. 1this has been added to the homepage in canvas 2thorstein veblen discussed the issues of “keeping up with the joneses” as a way to describe people maintaining a level of visible consumption that was similar to or at least as much as their neighbours. this is where the title for the tv show keeping up with the kardashians comes from, though not sure which individuals are their neighbours. 0="" for="" i="{S,N})" assuming="" lia’s="" preferences="" would="" result="" in="" her="" purchasing="" 10="" novels.="" what="" is="" the="" budget="" line?="" what="" is="" her="" real="" income="" in="" terms="" of="" memory="" sticks?="" (b)="" (4="" marks)="" before="" lia="" makes="" any="" purchases,="" the="" place="" she="" purchases="" books="" from="" offers="" the="" following="" deal:="" any="" additional="" books="" purchased="" after="" the="" first="" 10="" will="" get="" a="" 25%="" discount.="" use="" a="" revealed="" preferences="" argument="" to="" explain="" how="" we="" know="" lia="" will="" be="" better="" off.="" would="" this="" be="" true="" for="" all="" utility="" functions?="" explain="" why="" or="" why="" not.="" (c)="" (5="" marks)="" another="" seller="" of="" books="" makes="" the="" following="" offer:="" get="" a="" 25%="" discount="" on="" orders="" of="" the="" first="" 10="" books.="" create="" a="" graph="" of="" the="" new="" budget="" constraint.="" explain="" how="" this="" would="" adjust="" lia’s="" bundle="" with="" a="" reference="" to="" income="" and="" substitution="" effects="" (you="" do="" not="" have="" to="" give="" a="" specific="" bundle).="" assume="" that="" both="" goods="" are="" normal.="" (d)="" (3="" marks)="" could="" lia="" be="" indifferent="" between="" the="" discount="" option="" in="" part="" (b)="" and="" (c)?="" explain="" why="" or="" why="" not.="" 4.="" (15="" marks)="" read="" the="" chapter="" “homer="" economicus="" or="" homer="" sapiens?”="" by="" jodi="" beggs1.="" the="" chapter="" focuses="" on="" the="" idea="" of="" behavioural="" economics="" in="" the="" tv="" show="" the="" simp-="" sons.="" this="" question="" asks="" you="" to="" consider="" how="" our="" simple="" model="" of="" behaviour="" (i.e.="" u(qx,="" qy)="" subject="" to="" y="Pxqx" +="" pyqy)="" compares="" with="" both="" the="" world="" of="" homer="" simp-="" son="" and="" the="" real="" world.="" to="" answer="" this="" question="" and="" receive="" full="" marks,="" your="" response="" should="" be="" approximately="" two="" paragraphs="" (and="" no="" more="" than="" three).="" the="" main="" question="" to="" answer="" is="" “how="" does="" our="" simple="" model="" fail="" to="" capture="" some="" important="" behavioural="" aspects="" demonstrated="" in="" the="" television="" show="" the="" simpsons?”="" the="" focus="" should="" address="" the="" following="" three="" ideas/concepts:="" i)="" how="" does="" the="" assump-="" tion="" the="" people="" live="" one="" period="" limit="" the="" model,="" ii)="" how="" does="" our="" assumption="" that="" utility="" is="" ordinal="" limit="" modeling="" issues="" of="" altruism,="" and="" iii)="" how="" does="" our="" model="" neglect="" elements="" such="" as="" keeping="" up="" with="" the="" joneses2?="" ="" hint="" :="" even="" though="" your="" answer="" needs="" to="" be="" written="" in="" sentences,="" it="" might="" be="" helpful="" to="" think="" about="" utility="" as="" ui(a,="" qi,="" qj)="W" (a,="" qi)="" +="" v="" (qj)="" where="" a="" is="" all="" other="" goods="" than="" q,="" qi="" is="" consumption="" choice="" of="" good="" q="" for="" person="" i,="" and="" qj="" is:="" consumption="" choice="" of="" good="" q="" in="" the="" future,="" consumption="" choice="" of="" good="" q="" by="" others,="" or="" average="" consumption="" choice="" of="" good="" q.="" 1this="" has="" been="" added="" to="" the="" homepage="" in="" canvas="" 2thorstein="" veblen="" discussed="" the="" issues="" of="" “keeping="" up="" with="" the="" joneses”="" as="" a="" way="" to="" describe="" people="" maintaining="" a="" level="" of="" visible="" consumption="" that="" was="" similar="" to="" or="" at="" least="" as="" much="" as="" their="" neighbours.="" this="" is="" where="" the="" title="" for="" the="" tv="" show="" keeping="" up="" with="" the="" kardashians="" comes="" from,="" though="" not="" sure="" which="" individuals="" are="" their=""> 0 for i = {s,n}) assuming lia’s preferences would result in her purchasing 10 novels. what is the budget line? what is her real income in terms of memory sticks? (b) (4 marks) before lia makes any purchases, the place she purchases books from offers the following deal: any additional books purchased after the first 10 will get a 25% discount. use a revealed preferences argument to explain how we know lia will be better off. would this be true for all utility functions? explain why or why not. (c) (5 marks) another seller of books makes the following offer: get a 25% discount on orders of the first 10 books. create a graph of the new budget constraint. explain how this would adjust lia’s bundle with a reference to income and substitution effects (you do not have to give a specific bundle). assume that both goods are normal. (d) (3 marks) could lia be indifferent between the discount option in part (b) and (c)? explain why or why not. 4. (15 marks) read the chapter “homer economicus or homer sapiens?” by jodi beggs1. the chapter focuses on the idea of behavioural economics in the tv show the simp- sons. this question asks you to consider how our simple model of behaviour (i.e. u(qx, qy) subject to y = pxqx + pyqy) compares with both the world of homer simp- son and the real world. to answer this question and receive full marks, your response should be approximately two paragraphs (and no more than three). the main question to answer is “how does our simple model fail to capture some important behavioural aspects demonstrated in the television show the simpsons?” the focus should address the following three ideas/concepts: i) how does the assump- tion the people live one period limit the model, ii) how does our assumption that utility is ordinal limit modeling issues of altruism, and iii) how does our model neglect elements such as keeping up with the joneses2? hint : even though your answer needs to be written in sentences, it might be helpful to think about utility as ui(a, qi, qj) = w (a, qi) + v (qj) where a is all other goods than q, qi is consumption choice of good q for person i, and qj is: consumption choice of good q in the future, consumption choice of good q by others, or average consumption choice of good q. 1this has been added to the homepage in canvas 2thorstein veblen discussed the issues of “keeping up with the joneses” as a way to describe people maintaining a level of visible consumption that was similar to or at least as much as their neighbours. this is where the title for the tv show keeping up with the kardashians comes from, though not sure which individuals are their neighbours.>