I attached one pdf file and one doc file. PDF file in 3 Task. Task 1 in 5 minutes presentation...with 5 slides...with I want to speaker notes for 5 minutes..no less...Task 2 is a case study...word...

1 answer below »
I attached one pdf file and one doc file. PDF file in 3 Task. Task 1 in 5 minutes presentation...with 5 slides...with I want to speaker notes for 5 minutes..no less...Task 2 is a case study...word limit is 800 words...I attached also one doc file...in doc file is a case study...so pls check...Task 3 is role play...All detail mentioned in the pdf file...Thank you


Criteria and Standards Sheet Module 2: Australian Workplace Culture & WHS EAW1 – Assessment information Module 2 EAW1 Assessment - Australian Workplace Culture and WHS V5.1 © QIBA Pty Ltd P a g e | 1 This assessment covers Module 2: Australian Workplace Culture & WHS, which includes course content for Working with Culture and Diversity as well as Work, Health and Safety, which are all part of the QIBA Professional Year Program curriculum TASK 1: Individual Presentation on Australian Workplace Culture & Diversity (5 minutes) a) Research Australian legislation which impacts on Diversity (e.g. racial discrimination, sexual harassment) b) Prepare no more than 5 Power Point slides for a presentation c) Deliver a short oral presentation to the class about your experience/understanding of Australian Workplace Culture & Diversity, based on your work experience and/or research. The PowerPoint slides are submitted in LMS as: Your Name _M2 EAW1 -Aus Workplace Culture & Diversity PP Your in-class presentation must include: • The background to at least two of the following forms of diversity: mental and physical ability; age; belief systems/values; culture; race; religion; gender and sexual orientation; language; politics • Your understanding of the laws dealing with abuse or discrimination • The impact of this diversity on the workplace (e.g. special considerations given to particular employees with a diversity) • Which strategies you used to respond to those diversity issues (e.g. a change of behavior or attitude) • How Australian practices of equal opportunity and social inclusion compare with those in your country of birth. This brief presentation will be assessed during PYP course session Module 2 Session 2 (You should prepare no more than 5 slides of a PowerPoint). Please note and address the assessment criteria listed below: Task 1: Individual Presentation (5 minutes) - ASSESSMENT CRITERIA Background The presenter clearly identifies the forms of diversity found in their workplace (or higher education institution), using at least 2 examples from personal experience Impact The presenter discusses how those differences have an impact on the workplace, whether positive or negative, and their foundation in Australian Industrial Relations laws Strategies The presenter adequately explains their response to the diversity issues mentioned and how they modified their behaviour in order to accommodate this diversity. He/she also draws comparisons with diversity in their country of birth Legislative requirements The presenter gives evidence of research analysis and understanding of Australian laws related to Workplace diversity, including EEO and Fair Work laws Module 2: Australian Workplace Culture & WHS EAW1 – Assessment information Module 2 EAW1 Assessment - Australian Workplace Culture and WHS V5.1 © QIBA Pty Ltd P a g e | 2 TASK 2: Case Study Analysis (800 words) Write a concise review of the WHS issues raised in our assessment Case Study: When WHS training, supervision and communication fail. Your review must include the following: • A brief overview of the organisational responsibilities for managing WHS under current legislation. • Your analysis of the Duty of Care of stakeholders and PCBUs (State Government Public Works Department, External Contracting Company, Supervisors and Employees) and how the State Government failed to manage the general WHS risks in contracted public works before the incident. • Your views on whether in this case Safe Work Method Statements (SWMS) or Toolbox Talks could have prevented the accident (or not) • Your assessment of which of the changes introduced by the Department of Public Works will have the most impact on WHS and which will be more or less adding to the bureaucracy and unproductive paperwork You must submit this case study analysis in LMS at the end of Session 3. Your Name _M2 EAW1 _WHS Case Study Analysis Please address the assessment criteria listed below: Task 2: Case Study Analysis (800 words) - ASSESSMENT CRITERIA Provide information to the work team about WHS policies and procedures The reviewer outlines the broad organisational responsibilities for managing WHS (including WHS training, identification of hazards, assessing and controlling risks, as well as the legal requirement to implement policies and monitor procedures. Stakeholders’ Duty of Care The reviewer clearly identifies the main elements of the Duty of Care under the WHS Act, as well as the responsibilities of a PCBU (Person Conducting a Business or Undertaking). This includes a discussion of how the failures could have been avoided and what procedures should be in place to avoid a re-occurrence of any such critical incidents Impact of SWMS and Toolbox talks on WHS The reviewer describes the function of SWMS (Safe Work Methods Statement) and Tool Box talks in maintaining WHS on the work site. The reviewer also considers their potential effect on the outcome of this Case Study, based on the evidence provided (e.g. could the deaths have been prevented with effective SWMS or Toolbox talks?) Likely effect of Changes made on WHS in future The reviewer identifies the range of changes implemented by the State Department of Public Works following the critical incident and evaluates the relative cost and ‘practicability’ of these changes. The reviewer also predicts which changes will have the greatest impact on Workplace Health & Safety and which have the potential to fail due to bureaucratic ‘overkill’ or excessive paperwork Module 2: Australian Workplace Culture & WHS EAW1 – Assessment information Module 2 EAW1 Assessment - Australian Workplace Culture and WHS V5.1 © QIBA Pty Ltd P a g e | 3 TASK 3: Role play of WHS scenarios for assessment in pairs You and a partner in class will be given role play cards which explain your roles and work situations. Each role play involves an incident or complaint related to work health and safety. After discussing the scenario with your partner, demonstrate your understanding of WHS reporting protocol and your duty of care in safety monitoring in general. Role play examples: (Person 1): You work as a Web-designer for a medium-sized IT business. Most of the work you do is at a desk, fitted out with specialised equipment. (a) Your desk is located directly under an air conditioner and (b) the computer screens may not be in the correct position for your body type. Recently you have been suffering from a lot of neck and shoulder pain, and it is getting worse. Report this problem to your supervisor. (Use your knowledge of WHS regulations) (Person 2): You are the Manager of the Graphics design department of a medium-sized IT business. One of your employees comes to you complaining of neck and shoulder pain. Respond to their complaint. (Use your knowledge of WHS legislation) This assessment will be conducted in class during Module 2 Session 3. Please address the assessment criteria listed below: Task 3: Role play of WHS scenarios for assessment in pairs - ASSESSMENT CRITERIA Opening: Approaches topic appropriately/ responds to complaint appropriately Shows awareness of participation arrangements for managing WHS Speakers: Reasons for reporting the incident: Clearly explains the problem/ responds to complaint clearly. Information: Speakers gather or provide the relevant information regarding the incident, referring to organisational procedures. Consultation: Participants work together to find a solution to the problem. Collaboration: Participants recognise individual differences and respond appropriately Process: Strategies: Participants clearly identify strategies which will be put in place to prevent this problem from recurring. Communication of outcomes: Participants decide how to communicate the outcome of their consultation to the rest of the workforce. Comment on: Benefits: Participants are able to identify benefits of effective processes for monitoring WHS in the workplace. Case Study 1: When WHS training, supervision and communication fail This Case Study report has been adapted for the QIBA PYP Program and is used for the assessment of Module 2: Australian Workplace Culture (Work, Health and Safety) Extract from Workplace OHS (based on NSW IRC File 1446 of 2008) A State Government Public
Answered 12 days AfterJun 01, 2022

Answer To: I attached one pdf file and one doc file. PDF file in 3 Task. Task 1 in 5 minutes...

Insha answered on Jun 03 2022
97 Votes
Running Head: TASK 3: ROLE PLAY                             1
TASK 3: ROLE PLAY                                     2
MODULE 2: AUSTRALIAN WORKPLA
CE CULTURE & WHS
TASK 3: ROLE PLAY OF WHS SCENARIOS FOR ASSESSMENT IN PAIRS
Scenario: Seating arrangement and issues due to it.
Person 1: Hello, P2, how are you doing today? Do you have a few minutes to spare? I'd want to speak with you about something.
Person 2: Good day, P1. How are you? I'm ok. Right now, I am idle. What topic would you want to discuss?
Person 1: I'd want to discuss a problem I'm having with my current sitting arrangement.
Person 2: What exactly is the problem?
Person 1: I'm having pain in my shoulders and neck.
Person 2: That's really awful to hear. Could you elaborate on...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here