http://www.oecd.org/going-digital/ai/principles/Microsoft Word - FIT5205 2020 Assignment 4 Ethical Framework Review v2.docx FACULTY OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 2020 1 FIT5205 DATA IN SOCIETY ASSIGNMENT 4: CRITICAL REVIEW OF AN EMERGING ETHICAL AI FRAMEWORK Your task You will be assigned an emerging Ethical AI framework to investigate and critically review. You will be required to: Describe and explain its content, context and stakeholders Identify and discuss its ethical stance (demonstrating your ability to apply the Beard & Longstaff ethical design framework) Canvas and discuss its governance o How would individuals and organisations demonstrate that they are acting in accordance with the framework? o How would individuals and organisations be held to account with the framework? o What regulatory structures and bodies are required? A summary of its strengths and limitations Value 30% of your total marks for the unit. Word Limit 2,000 ‐ 2,500 words (excluding references) Due Date Week 14: Friday 26 June 2020, 11.55pm Submission Via Moodle Assignment Submission. Turnitin will be used for similarity checking of all submissions. Assessment Criteria Ability to undertake the necessary research and analysis, write with clarity and cohesion, cite and reference as required. Ability to describe and explain the framework's content, context and stakeholders. Ability to identify and discuss its ethical stance. Ability to canvas and discuss its governance. Ability to come to a consistent conclusion regarding its strengths and limitations. 2020 2 REVIEW REQUIREMENTS Your review will be written in the form of a report and should include: An Executive Summary A Table of Contents An introduction indicating the aim, focus, and structure of the report An explanation of the content, context and stakeholders associated with the Ethical AI Framework A discussion of the Framework’s ethical stance. A discussion of the Framework’s governance A conclusion summarising its strengths and limitations In‐text citations and a reference list to the evidence base of your report using the APA style of citing and referencing. Report formatting requirements – 10‐12 point font, margins not less than 2 centimetres from all sides, single‐spaced. The Q Manual from the Monash Business School has some great advice about report writing. See https://www.monash.edu/business/current‐students/study‐ resources/qmanual.pdf REFERENCES These resources may be of use in developing your report Beard, M., & Longstaff, S. (2018). Ethical by Design: Principles for Good Technology. The Ethics Centre. https://ethics.org.au/ethical‐by‐design/ [Pdf available on the Moodle site for the unit] Farthing, S., Howell, J., Lecchi, K., Paleologos, Z., Saintilan, P., & Santow, E. (2019). Human Rights and Technology Discussion Paper. Australian Human Rights Commission. https://tech.humanrights.gov.au/sites/default/files/2019‐ 12/TechRights2019_DiscussionPaper.pdf Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019). The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(9), 389–399. https://www.nature.com/articles/s42256‐019‐ 0088‐2 Perrault, R., Shoham, Y., Brynjolfsson, E., Clark, J., Etchemendy, J., Grosz, B., Lyons, T., Manyika, J., Mishra, S., & Niebles, J. C. (2019). Chapter 8: Societal Considerations. In Artificial Intelligence Index Report 2019 (pp. 146–155). AI Index Steering Committee, Human‐Centered AI Institute, Stanford University. https://hai.stanford.edu/sites/g/files/sbiybj10986/f/ai_index_2019_report.pdf 2020 3 Theodorou, A., & Dignum, V. (2020). Towards ethical and socio‐legal governance in AI. Nature Machine Intelligence, 2(1), 10–12. https://www‐nature‐ com.ezproxy.lib.monash.edu.au/articles/s42256‐019‐0136‐y ASSESSMENT A marking rubric will be available on the Moodle site for the unit. CITING AND REFERENCING You must appropriately acknowledge ALL the sources that you use in develop your assignment submission, so that it is clear what are your ideas and what are the ideas of others. Use the APA Style (http://guides.lib.monash.edu/content.php?pid=346637&sid=2835402) to provide enough information about your references so that a future reader may locate and read the original source. Please also note the following from the ‘Student Academic Integrity: Managing Plagiarism and Collusion Procedures’ of Monash, available at http://www.policy.monash.edu/policy‐ bank/academic/education/conduct/student‐academic‐integrity‐managing‐plagiarism‐ collusion‐procedures.html. Plagiarism occurs when students fail to acknowledge that the ideas of others are being used. Specifically it occurs when: other people’s work and/or ideas are paraphrased and presented without a reference; other people’s work is copied either in whole or in part; other people’s designs, codes or images are presented as the student’s own work; phrases and passages are used verbatim without quotation marks and/or without a reference to the author or a web page; lecture notes are reproduced without due acknowledgement.