HI mateyou need to make assignment on relation between self leadership and critical thinking skills. this article is attached in the files. please check.
School of Business and Law CQUniversity CRICOS Provider Code: 02219C Page 1 of 2 MGMT 20135: Critical Thinking and Managerial Decision Making Assessment 1: Practical and Written Assessment-Article Review This assessment item accounts for 30% of your final grade for this unit and must be completed by students individually Due: The assessment is due on Monday of Week 4, 5th August 2019 at 5.00 PM AEST. Task: The review must be 1500 words in length excluding references. Two points will be deducted for assessments that are over or under by 200 words. Cover page: The essay must include a cover page that contains your name, student number, resident campus, assessment title, lecturer and word count. Minimum number of peer-reviewed journal articles to pass: 10 Both on-campus students and distance students must write a review article and submit online via Moodle by the due date. Format: Text should be word-processed, Times New Roman, 12 size font and line spacing (1.5). Please save/upload your file in a Word format (.doc or .docx). Referencing: The list of references should form the last page or two, at the end of the assessment. Referencing should be in a consistent APA style. Task Description: The purpose of this task is for you to demonstrate your ability to critically analyse, synthesize and evaluate information and present that information in a written format. A list of articles will be available on the unit’s Moodle site for you to choose from. You will then write a critical article review based around your responses to the following questions. Critical Analysis • What is the background of the research? (Background) • What is the research objective? • What are the core research questions the article addresses? Why are they important to address? (Research questions) • How was the research conducted? (Methodology) • What where the major findings? (Findings) • What are the significance of the findings for future research or management practice? (Significance/implications) School of Business and Law CQUniversity CRICOS Provider Code: 02219C Page 2 of 2 Critical Evaluation • Critically state what you agree and do not agree about the article and explain why? (with specific examples from the article) • What are its strengths and weaknesses? • In your view, what is the overall value (e.g. contributions, advances, impacts, etc) of the article? Please do not simply list the questions and your response to them. The questions are to be used simply as a means for you to critically think about your chosen article. Your review needs to contain answers to these questions, but they need to be in essay format, that is, containing introduction section, body paragraphs and a conclusion section. MGMT 20135: Marking Rubrics for Assessment 1: Practical and Written Assessment-Article Review Section/Criteria 30% Fail (Less than 25%) Fail (26-49%) Pass (50‐59%) Credit (60‐69%) Distinction (70‐79%) High Distinction (80 ‐100%) Introduction: Clearly outlines the purpose, scope, structure of the essay. 3 No introduction. No topic, key points and/or purpose is introduced or the introduction is irrelevant to assessment item. Topic introduced, but the introduction is underdeveloped in terms of key points and/or purpose Topic, key points and purpose of the essay is introduced with satisfactory clarity. Topic, key points and purpose of the essay is introduced in a clear and interesting way. Topic, key points and purpose of the essay is introduced in an excellent and interesting way. Body—critical analysis The following list of questions are effectively addressed: o What is the background of the research? o What is the research objective? o What are the core research questions? Why are they important to address? o How was the research conducted? o What where the major findings? o What are the significance of the findings for future research or management practice? 10 Demonstrates little, if any, knowledge and understanding of the chosen article with extremely limited, if any, analysis. Might attempt all questions, but only one (1) of them is effectively addressed. Demonstrates limited knowledge and understanding of the chosen article by providing a limited level of analysis. Might attempt all questions, but only two (2) of them are effectively addressed. Demonstrate average level of understanding of the chosen article by providing an acceptable level of analysis. Three (3) of the attempted questions are effectively addressed. Demonstrates a good level of knowledge of the chosen article by providing some level of analysis. Four (4) of the attempted questions are effectively addressed. Demonstrates a balanced and high level of knowledge and understanding of the chosen article by providing a high level of analysis. Five (5) of the attempted questions are effectively addressed. Demonstrates a balanced and very high level of detailed knowledge and understanding of the chosen article by providing a very high level of analysis. All the six (6) questions are effectively addressed Body—critical evaluation The following list of questions are effectively addressed: o What you agree and do not agree about the article and explain why? o What are its strengths and weaknesses? o What is the overall value of the article? 10 Demonstrates little, if any, critical thinking with extremely limited, if any, analysis. None of the three questions is effectively addressed. Demonstrates limited critical thinking by providing a limited level of analysis. Might attempt all questions, only one (1) of them is effectively addressed. Demonstrate average level of critical thinking by providing an acceptable level of analysis. Two (2) of the three questions are effectively addressed. Demonstrates a good level of critical thinking by providing some level of analysis with evidence. At least Two (2) of the three questions are effectively addressed. Demonstrates a high level of critical thinking by providing a high level of analysis with evidence. All three (3) questions are effectively addressed. Demonstrates an exceptional level of critical thinking by providing a high level of analysis with strong and compelling evidence. All three (3) questions are effectively addressed. Conclusion: All aspects drawn together in a brief, concise summary. Consistent with findings, no new material introduced but highlights implications or a comment on the future of the issue. 3 No conclusions provided. Brief conclusion but no links established to the introduction and body of the essay. Brief conclusion with limited links established to the introduction and body of the essay. The conclusion provided some links to the introduction and body, but was not concise or unclear. The conclusion provided links to the introduction and body, but concise or unclear at times. Clear and concise summary of the essay with links to the introduction and body of the essay. MGMT 20135: Marking Rubrics for Assessment 1: Practical and Written Assessment-Article Review Presentation: High quality of expression, grammar, spelling, punctuation and proofreading. 2 Quality of writing is at a very poor standard so barely understandable. Many spelling mistakes. Little or no evidence of proof reading. Poor format, no cover page and not meeting the word count requirement. Some problems with sentence structure and presentation Frequent grammar, punctuation and spelling mistakes. Use of inappropriate language. There are a few formatting issues, not within word count, not containing cover page. Quality of writing is of an average standard. There are a few grammar, spelling and punctuation mistakes. There are minor format issues, such as layout is not in professional manner (i.e. 1.5 spacing, 12- size font, Times New Roman). But assessment cover page is included and within the word count. Quality of writing is of a good standard. Few grammar, spelling and punctuation mistakes. Minor format and layout issues, assessment cover page included, within the word count. Quality of writing is of a high standard. Few grammar, spelling and punctuation mistakes. Format and layout in professional manner (i.e. 1.5 spacing, 12- size font, Times New Roman). Assessment cover page included, within the word count. Quality of writing at a very high standard. Correct grammar, spelling and punctuation. Format and layout in professional manner (i.e. 1.5 spacing, 12-size font, Times New Roman). Assessment cover page included, within the word count. Referencing: Inclusion of an accurate reference list on a separate page listing only the sources that actually have been used. The reference list is arranged in alphabetical order according to the authors’ last names. 2