Hi, I needed an essay of 1500 words on topic of "Using both ’globalisation’ and ’neo-liberalism’ explain why transnational sex-trafficking occurs." with minimum of 5 scholarly references and also using the 3 annotated bibliography reference that I have done. I have also attached the essay guide with the essay marking criteria and the annotated bibliography.
12 2.4.3 Final Essay Weight: 40% Type of Collaboration: Individual Due: BEFORE 11:59PM on Sunday 24 October Submission: Submit using Turnitin on the unit’s vUWS site. Format: What format should I use when writing the essay? Your written response to the question will be submitted in the format of an academic essay. It would be appropriate to use headings to signal the way you will direct your analysis, explanation and discussion. At all times use a formal writing style and correct referencing. Full details on the referencing style for this unit can be found at: http://library.westernsydney.edu.au/main/sites/default/files/cite Harvard.pdf The essay MUST: - Respond to the essay question - Be word processed using 12 point font and double spaced - Adopt a fluent and scholarly writing style - Use a MINIMUM of five scholarly references (e.g. journal articles) - Support viewpoints with reasoned argument substantiated by relevant theoretical material and research evidence The following sections should be included in your essay: Introduction: Orients the reader to the topic, previewing the stages of the essay, and clarifying the writer’s position. Body paragraphs: The body of an essay consists of a logically sequenced series of paragraphs that develops the essay topic. Each paragraph should express one key idea that relates to your overall response to the essay question. Begin the paragraph by introducing the key idea and then explain and elaborate on the idea using relevant scholarly literature and research evidence. Try to use sentences that connect each paragraph to one another by linking ideas and lines of argument. Conclusion: Restates the major argument developed in the essay. Briefly summarise major points and implications. Length: 1,500 words Curriculum Mode: Essay Respond to ONE question from the options detailed below. The essay question MUST be the same essay question used in Assessment 3: Annotated Bibliography, unless you have negotiated a change of question with your tutor. 1. Choose ONE of the following issues, analyze the challenges and opportunities for improving the police or criminal justice response. Your analysis must use concepts from at least TWO theoretical perspectives covered in the unit. • Radicalisation • Drug Use • Youth Subcultures http://library.westernsydney.edu.au/main/sites/default/files/cite 13 2. Choose ONE of the following issues and analyze the problems this issue generates (i.e harm, cost, …). Critically comment on whether or not this problem is taken seriously by the criminal justice system. Your analysis must use concepts from at least TWO theoretical perspectives covered in the unit. • Crimes against the environment • Mass criminalisation and Indigenous people • Corporate or White-Collar Crime 3. Choose ONE of the transnational crimes listed below and using both ’globalisation’ and ’neo-liberalism’ explain why your chosen crime occurs • Sex Trafficking • State Corporate Crime • People Smuggling What if I encounter technical problems when trying to submit online? You should contact WSU IT Services on (02) 9852 5111, email:
[email protected] or via MyIT portal: http://myit.westernsydney.edu.au (including live chat) as soon as the difficulty arises and well before the due date and time. Then, while you wait for IT to resolve your issue please email a copy of your assessment (before the due date and time) to the Unit Coordinator as evidence of timely submission. As soon as the issue has been resolved submit your assignment through Turnitin for marking. Having a WSU IT ’Incident Ticket’ will serve as evidence of your attempt to submit. mailto:
[email protected] http://myit.westernsydney.edu.au/ 4 Learning Resources 4.1 Recommended Readings Prescribed Textbook Rodas, A, Simpson, M, Rawlinson, P, Kramer, R, Ryan, E, Taylor, E, Walters, R, Beckley, A, Cunneen, C, Gore, A, Porter, A, Poynting, S and Russell, E 2020. Crime, Deviance and Society: An Introduction to Sociological Criminology. Cambridge University Press, Port Melbourne. Additional Reading Curra, J 2017, The Relativity of Deviance, 4th Edn, Sage, Los Angeles Goode, E 2019, Deviant Behaviour, 12th Edn, Routledge, New York. Newburn, T, 2017, Criminology, 3rd Edn, Routledge, London. Walkate, S 2017, Criminology the Basics, 3rd Edn, Routledge, London. 23 Assessment 4: Final Essay (40%) Rubric Details and Criteria Assessment 4: Final Essay (40%) Criteria Fail Pass Credit Distinction High Distinction Introduction Provides a succinct introduction to the purpose and scope of the essay. Weight = 5 marks No clear statement of essay purpose and focus is presented (e.g. fails to answer the essay question and outline key arguments). Clear statement of essay purpose and focus but lacking one or two features (e.g. missing an explicit response to the essay but outlines arguments to be considered or describes the broad topic area without outlining a clear set of arguments). Clear statement of all aspects of essay purpose and focus (i.e. includes response to essay question, outlines arguments to support the response and list examples to be covered) but lacks a critical stance. Superior statement of all aspects of essay purpose and focus. This includes a clear connection between essay response and arguments and examples to be presented. A critical stance may be implied but not explicitly stated. Demonstrates an outstanding level; comprehensive statement of essay purpose and focus. Consistency across all aspects of the introduction. This includes the explicit statement of a critical stance. Conceptual Demonstrates an ability to draw on relevant theories and concepts from the unit, and apply them appropriately. Weight = 15 marks Demonstrates poor understanding of the concepts and/or theories that could be applied. Attempts to describe it are mostly unclear and/or incorrect. Demonstrates a limited understanding of the concepts and/or theory. Some minor errors or inaccuracies may be present or there has been limited application of theory/concepts. The essay is primarily descriptive; a restatement of the sources rather than analysis is presented. Demonstrates an accurate understanding of concepts/theory that could be used in the discussion. Provides a good restatement of the sources with some evaluation of key points and issues raised in the literature. But there is a dependence on one perspective in the application of concepts. Demonstrates not only accuracy in applying theory/concepts, but also provides a critical analysis by attempting to synthesis several perspectives. The synthesis may not appear throughout the entire essay but some evidence of synthesis is present. Demonstrates, an independent and critical synthesis of concepts for analysing the topic. Evidences a high degree of creativity and/or originality in the application of concepts. Research Demonstrates an ability to draw on scholarly research to support the claims being made in the essay. Weight = 15 marks Little research has been undertaken. Uses less than the minimum requirement of 5 scholarly sources. AND/OR Relies on non-scholarly internet sources (e.g. Wikipedia or blogs). Satisfactory research and reading has been undertaken (at minimum, 5 scholarly sources are used). There may be a heavy dependence on one or two sources without clear extraction of empirical evidence (e.g. statistical or interview data) from of the sources listed in the reference list. As per pass and makes an attempt to engage with the research by extracting evidence (e.g. statistical or interview data) from most of the sources listed in the reference list to support claims made in the essay. Exceeds the minimum requirements (i.e. uses more than 5 scholarly sources) and demonstrates critical usage of the sources. This is evident in the way that the essay is informed by a range of perspectives (e.g. sociological, and psychological). The essay is thoroughly researched and a clear attempt has been made to go beyond materials provided as part of the unit. Research materials have been carefully chosen, distinguishing between the relevance and quality of sources. Academic Literacy Written expression, structure and referencing. Weight = 5 marks Introduction, body and or conclusions are poor or missing. Central ideas are not clearly expressed. Grammatical errors and spelling mistakes make the essay difficult to comprehend. May plagiarise the ideas of others and fails to provide appropriate in- text citations, and/or reference list is missing. Evidence of essay structure present but sequence of ideas, is at times, not well considered or presented. General ideas are present, but several grammatical and spelling errors are masking the overall quality of the ideas being put forward. Some references cited incorrectly or absent in- text or in reference list. Demonstrates a reasonable ability in relation to essay structure, sequence of ideas is well considered. A few grammatical errors and spelling mistakes are present. But these do not mask the overall quality of the ideas being expressed. Most references cited correctly in-text and/or in reference list.