Hi, I need an essay for my Mexican American class. It deals with Mexican segregation. I will attach the instructions and rubric.
Analytical Paper Guidelines Your final paper will analyze Mexican segregation a theme from last week's lecture. It should be 5-6 pages (minimum 5 FULL pages). Your final paper is due Saturday November 28, 2020 by 12:00 PM. NOTICE IT IS STATED TO BE @ NOON NOT MIDNIGHT What is an analytical paper? · When you are required to write an analytical essay, it means in your essay you should present some argument, and then to analyze it thoroughly. Elements · The basic elements of academic essay writing are two: a thesis and evidence, divided into three parts: an introduction, the systematic development of an argument with EVIDENCE, and a conclusion. All scholarly writing, from the most concise paper to the longest book, follows these basic guidelines. Paper Guidelines: · Citation: Chicago Manual of Style · https://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/tools_citationguide/citation-guide-2.html · https://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/tools_citationguide/citation-guide-1.html · Times New Roman, 12 point font, 1 inch margins, double-spaced · You must cite at least THREE sources. They can be readings from class or outside academic articles that you’ve found. · You should have at least TWO direct quotes from a reading. Additional evidence may be paraphrased and referenced. Grading Rubric: Points Criteria 22.5 - 25 points (A) · Well-developed thesis directly addressing the topic. · Persuasive analysis of the topic, addressing all parts of the topic; analysis demonstrates thorough understanding of all sides of a question (as appropriate). · Outstanding grasp of general historical issues raised by topic. · Numerous specific examples demonstrate detailed knowledge of relevant history. · Extremely well organized, with a clear introduction, argument, and conclusion. · Well written in appropriate standard English; few grammatical errors or colloquialisms 20 – 22.4 points (B) · Clear thesis addressing the topic. · Good analysis of the topic, addressing most parts of the topic; analysis demonstrates understanding of all sides of a question (as appropriate), though may be unevenly developed. · Good grasp of general historical issues raised by topic. · Several specific examples demonstrate good knowledge of relevant history. · Well organized, with an introduction, argument, and conclusion. · Clearly written in appropriate standard English; some grammatical errors or colloquialisms. 17.5 – 19.9 points (C) · Thesis indicates some aspect of the topic; more a restatement of than a point about the topic. · Analysis of the topic, addressing most parts of the topic; analysis adequate but unevenly developed. · Some grasp of general historical issues raised by topic, though some significant issues may be omitted. · Some specific examples demonstrate knowledge of relevant history; some clearly relevant examples omitted. · Contains at least two of the following: introduction, argument, and conclusion; organization may be somewhat unclear. · Understandable, but contains several grammatical errors or colloquialisms. 0 – 17.4 (Anywhere from an F to a D) · No discernible thesis and/or serious misunderstanding of the topic. · Descriptive rather than analytical; marginally related to the topic; significant logical gaps. · Little grasp of general historical issues raised by topic. · Few and/or erroneous specific examples demonstrate little knowledge of relevant history. · Poorly organized: no clear introduction, argument, or conclusion. · Pattern of grammatical errors and/or inappropriate colloquialisms.