Amanuel Assefa XXXXXXXXXX RESEARCH ESSAY PLAN Amanuel Assefa XXXXXXXXXX Table of Contents Proposed Title3 Thesis Statement3 Introduction3 Topic Sentences3 Conclusion4 Bibliography5 Proposed...

1 answer below »
hey this task is based on order38990you've already done the plan but now its just the actual essay.


Amanuel Assefa 44932367 RESEARCH ESSAY PLAN Amanuel Assefa 44932367 Table of Contents Proposed Title3 Thesis Statement3 Introduction3 Topic Sentences3 Conclusion4 Bibliography5 Proposed Title · The proposed title of this essay is “Recidivism— How it leads to the re-imprisonment of the Convicted” · This topic has been chosen because the convicted criminals often have a tendency to commit crimes repeatedly even after they have served their punishment session. Thesis Statement The proposed research essay will argue on the greatest extent, to which recidivism can lead to the increment of the criminal intentions of the convicted criminals, as a result of which, they might have to serve their sentences of imprisonment repeatedly even after being released. Introduction · Since recidivism is a common behavioural aspect amongst the prisoners or criminals, therefore, it is very important to understand this concept in depth. · It will also critically analyse the rate of increase in the number of times released criminals are being punished with re-imprisonment, as an account of recidivism. · Hence, this topic has been chosen for writing a plan to a research essay. · The essay plan will serve as the backbone to the final draft for the research essay in future, which will be written based on this plan only. Topic Sentences · ‘Recidivism is the tendency of the criminals to commit crimes again and again’ According to Chouldechova (2017), recidivism is a psychological thought process of the convicted criminals that makes them believe in the righteousness of their criminal deeds and hence, continually forces them to tread those paths of time. · ‘Even after they are being punished for their crimes through imprisonment and fines, yet they are committing those crimes, once they are released from the prison.’ As stated by Zeng, Ustun and Rudin (2017), once the convicted criminals are being released from the prisons, they should consider the hardships they had to go through solely due to their criminal activities. However, as argued by Dressel and Farid (2018), they might a sense of recidivism and choose not to go by their conscience. · ‘Recidivism is increasing the rate of re-imprisonment of criminals in many countries.’ Thus, the number of cases of re-imprisonment is increasing day by day. As mentioned by Skeem and Lowenkamp (2016), the security of the people in the society is questionable if released convicted criminals are allowed to stay among them. · ‘It is very important to analyse the actual reasons behind the same, in order to resolve the issue’ However, as criticised by Loza (2018), before judging the criminals for their acts of recidivism, it is also very important that their intentions behind the same are evaluated. This brings to analysing the reasons for recidivism, which show that lack of acceptance, prejudice and ill-treatment by the society, in which they go back after being released from the jails, lead to recidivism largely. More other reasons will also be analysed in this essay. · ‘Jail Authorities, governmental and non-governmental bodies are trying to analyse the core of this issue, and for the same, they should put in place strict measures to reduce recidivism.’ For reducing recidivism and checking that, the criminals do not develop this intention, forms of control measures such as employment opportunities and psychological counselling are being provided by the jail authorities, governmental and non-governmental bodies (Schnepel, 2017). Conclusion · As inferred from the essay, convicted criminals always have the tendency to commit the crimes they used to do before being convicted. · This tendency of returning, back to the previous criminal form is termed as recidivism. · Due to recidivism, many times, the released criminals from prison, who have already had completed their tenure of imprisonment, have to be punished with longer or more severe punishment. · Government and non-governmental organisations, along with the jail authorities are striving towards taking care of the aim that the frequencies and instances of recidivism occurring in the society can be decreased in their lives. Bibliography Chouldechova, A., (2017). Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instruments. Big data, 5(2): 153-163 Dressel, J., and Farid, H. (2018). The accuracy, fairness, and limits of predicting recidivism. Science advances, 4(1): eaao5580 Loza, W. (2018). Self-Appraisal Questionnaire (SAQ): A tool for assessing violent and non-violent recidivism. Handbook of Recidivism Risk/Needs Assessment Tools, 165 Schnepel, K. T. (2017). Good jobs and recidivism. The Economic Journal, 128(608): 447-469 Skeem, J.L. and Lowenkamp, C.T., (2016). Risk, race, and recidivism: Predictive bias and disparate impact. Criminology, 54(4): 680-712 Zeng, J., Ustun, B., and Rudin, C. (2017). Interpretable classification models for recidivism prediction. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 180(3): 689-722 5 Untitled SAGE UK Style Guide 17 6.1 SAGE Harvard 1. General 1. Initials should be used without spaces or full points. 2. Up to three authors may be listed. If more are provided, then list the first three authors and represent the rest by et al. Fewer authors followed by et al. is also acceptable. 2. Text citations 1. All references in the text and notes must be specified by the authors’ last names and date of publication together with page numbers if given. 2. Do not use ibid., op. cit., infra., supra. Instead, show the subsequent citation of the same source in the same way as the first. 3. Where et al. is used in textual citations, this should always be upright, not italic. Note the following for the style of text citations: 1. If the author’s name is in the text, follow with year in parentheses: ... Author Last Name (year) has argued ... 2. If author’s name is not in the text, insert last name, comma and year: ... several works (Author Last Name, year) have described ... 3. Where appropriate, the page number follows the year, separated by a colon: ... it has been noted (Author Last Name, year: page nos) that ... 4. Where there are two authors, give both names, joined by ‘and’; if three or more authors, use et al.: ... it has been stated (Author Last Name and Author Last Name, year) ... ... some investigators (Author Last Name et al., year) ... 5. If there is more than one reference to the same author and year, insert a, b, etc. in both the text and the list: ... it was described (Author Last Name, yeara, yearb) ... 6. Enclose within a single pair of parentheses a series of references, separated by semicolons: ... and it has been noted (Author Last Name and Author Last Name, year; Author Last Name and Author Last Name, year; Author Last Name, year) ... Please order alphabetically by author names. 7. If two or more references by the same author are cited together, separate the dates with a comma: ... the author has stated this in several studies (Author Last Name, year, year, year, year) ... Please start with the oldest publication. 8. Enclose within the parentheses any brief phrase associated with the reference: ... several investigators have claimed this (but see Author Last Name, year: page nos–page nos) 9. For an institutional authorship, supply the minimum citation from the beginning of the complete reference: ... a recent statement (Name of Institution, year: page nos) ... ... occupational data (Name of Bureau or Institution, year: page nos) reveal ... 10. For authorless articles or studies, use the name of the magazine, journal, newspaper or sponsoring organization, and not the title of the article: ... it was stated (Name of Journal, year) that ... 11. Citations from personal communications are not included in the reference list: ... has been hypothesized (Name of Person Cited, year, personal communication). SAGE UK Style Guide 18 3. Reference list 1. Check that the list is in alphabetical order (treat Mc as Mac). 2. Names should be in upper and lower case. 3. Where several references have the same author(s), do not use ditto marks or em dashes; the name must be repeated each time. 4. Last Names containing de, van, von, De, Van, Von, de la, etc. should be listed under D and V respectively. List them as: De Roux DP and not Roux DP, de. When cited in the main text without the first name, use capitals for De, Van, Von, De la, etc. (Van Dijk, year) 5. Names containing Jr or II should be listed as follows: • Author Last Name Initial Jr (year) • Author Last Name Initial II (year) 6. References where the first-named author is the same should be listed as follows: • Single-author references in date order; • Two-author references in alphabetical order according to the second author’s name; • Et al. references in alphabetical order; in the event of more than one entry having the same date, they should be placed in alphabetical order of second (or third) author, and a, b, etc. must be inserted. Brown J (2003) Brown TR and Yates P (2003) Brown W (2002) Brown W (2003a) Brown W (2003b) Brown W and Jones M (2003) Brown W and Peters P (2003) Brown W, Hughes J and Kent T (2003a) Brown W, Kent T and Lewis S (2003b) 7. Check that all periodical data are included – volume, issue and page numbers, publisher, place of publication, etc. 8. Journal titles should not be abbreviated in SAGE Harvard journal references 9. Where et al. is used in reference lists, it should always be upright, not italic. 4. Reference styles
Answered Same DayMay 13, 2021

Answer To: Amanuel Assefa XXXXXXXXXX RESEARCH ESSAY PLAN Amanuel Assefa XXXXXXXXXX Table of Contents Proposed...

Soumi answered on May 21 2021
158 Votes
WHAT LEADS TO COMMITTING MURDERS AND HOW MURDERS AFFECT THE WELLBEING OF THE SOCIETY?
Table of Contents
Introduction    3
Cause of murder    3
Crime causation theory related murder    3
Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID) Theory    4
Theory of Violentization    5
Social Disorganisation Theory    5
Dissociative identity disorder theory is best suited to understand cause of murder    6
Comparison of dissociative identity disorder theory with theory of violentization and social disor
ganisation theory    6
Conclusion    7
References    8
Introduction
The rate of crimes is vigorously increasing in all parts of the world. From corporate espionage to petty robberies, criminals are able to find out the innovative ideas to commit the crimes, yet save themselves from judiciary system. Crimes have become a serious problem of the society. One of the heinous crimes is murder. The rate of murder both intentional and unintentional is increasing every year. Criminologist have tested many theories to identify the causative factor, which drive individuals to commit murders.
It has been found that dissociative theory is the best theory model to understand the cause of murder. The following essay argued that dissociative identity theory is best suited theory to explain murder when compared with theory of violentization and social disorganisation theory. The following assignment provides them brief insight of the factors associated with types of murder. It discusses the crime causation theory to identify the best theory for murder. It compares all the theories and give the conclusion based on the analysis.
Cause of murder
Murder is categorised broadly into four categories. These categories overlap with each other. There is murder, capital murder, manslaughter and criminally negligent homicide, which is also known as accidental murder. As mentioned by Clarke (2016), cause of murder is specifically adhered to the agenda of the perpetrator. Murder has always been done with intention to harm another person. The motives behind the murder varies from jealousy to ego and fear of identification in case of robbery or kidnapping. The murderer can be one-time convict or regular offender like serial killer.
One-time convict are the people who have personal motives in committing murder like self-defence, jealousy and ego. In case of regular offender, the most horrifying murderer is serial killer. As suggested by Malizia (2017), serial killers are one of the most dangerous types of killers who enjoy killing people without any personal motives. Their psychology drives them to commit murders. Other than serial killers, people engaged in business of drugs lords or with criminal gangs often commit more than one murder.
Crime causation theory related murder
Psychology or driving force, which is responsible for instigating people to commit murders are best understood using crime causation theories. These theories help in analysing the behaviour and nature of the person associated with murders. There are many theories related to murder like biological determinism, strain theory or rational choice theory. Following essay will study the dissociative identity disorder theory, theory of Violentization and social disorganisation theory to deduct the causation of murder.
Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID) Theory
Dissociative identity disorder theory was earlier known as multiple personality disorder. As suggested by Ozturk and Sar (2016), this theory states that the mental disorder is responsible for the disruption of memory, awareness, perception and identity of the individual. People with the dissociative identity disorder developed one or many separate personalities that functions without the awareness of individual’s normal or usual personality. This is a mental disorder, which affects the individual’s consciousness that normally work properly. When memory, awareness and perception is disrupted, dissociative symptoms can occur in individual’s personality. The incidences of true dissociative identity disorder are rare. Whenever they occur at any age.
As mentioned by Dorahy et al. (2017), a long history of the trauma is for the development of dissociative identity disorder. Most of the cases of dissociative identity disorder involved history of abuse, which results into sexual, physical and emotional trauma. Natural disasters, accidents and wars can also be responsible for the trauma that imprint the personality of individual. Sudden loss of the loved ones like parents or siblings, and long-term isolation due to illness can also be the factor. It has been seen that dissociation of memories is kind of coping mechanism used by individual to take a refuge from their stressful or traumatic situations or...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here