Here is an obviously false theorem, together with a (nonobviously) bogus proof. Identify precisely the flaw in the argument and explain where the proof fails.
False Theorem: 1 = 0.
Proof. Consider the four shapes in Figure 4.34(a), and the two arrangements thereof in Figure 4.34(b). (See below.
The area of the triangle in the first configuration is 13 5/2 = 65/2, as it forms a right triangle with height 5 and base 13. But the second configuration also forms a right triangle with height 5 and base 13 as well, and therefore it too has area 65/2. But the second configuration has one unfilled square in the triangle, and thus we have
Already registered? Login
Not Account? Sign up
Enter your email address to reset your password
Back to Login? Click here