ASSESSMENT BRIEF I DIGITAL VISUALISATION 1 File: DVI102_Assessment 2 Author: Jason Gemenis Date: 12/02/2020 Status: Final Assessment Brief DIGITAL VISUALISATION Assessment 2 Infographics Presentation...

Hello, can you please give me a quotation on this assignment?


ASSESSMENT BRIEF I DIGITAL VISUALISATION 1 File: DVI102_Assessment 2 Author: Jason Gemenis Date: 12/02/2020 Status: Final Assessment Brief DIGITAL VISUALISATION Assessment 2 Infographics Presentation Due: Week 7 Weighting: 25% Type: Visual Presentation Learning Outcomes: c. represent data in an informational graphics presentation; f. present compelling visual presentations as part of the pitching process. Description: Research a current social or ethical issue. Produce two digital assets to communicate this research. The first should be a presentation that is between 15 to 20 slides, lasting 8 minutes created in Google Slides or Canva.com. The second should be an infographic created in Canva.com. Ideally, you will research around 10 to 15 statistical facts relating to your chosen topic and use Harvard referencing. Details: Data visualisation of at least 10-15 points of data in a 15-20-page presentation. Upload final presentation to Moodle as a PDF file for marking. ASSESSMENT BRIEF I DIGITAL VISUALISATION 1 File: DVI102_Assessment 2 Author: Jason Gemenis Date: 12/02/2020 Status: Final Marking Criteria & Rubrics: Criterion 1: Depth, originality and evidence of research and analysis – 30% Fail: • Little or no evidence of research and/or support material. References missing • Review of origin, purpose, function and reputation of the product not attempted or incomplete Pass: • Demonstrates very limited research with very limited or no support material submitted. References missing or largely incorrect • Review of origin, purpose, function and reputation of the product incomplete and/or lacking logical organisation Credit: • Some evidence of research. Occasional use of relevant research data and theory to support findings. References mostly correct and in academic style • Review of origin, purpose, function and reputation of the product presented in a logical manner Distinction: • Evidence of extensive research. Some use of relevant research data and theory to support critical evaluation. All sources referenced correctly • Review of origin, purpose, function and reputation of the product design presented in a logical, concise and succinct manner with small exception High Distinction • Extensive use of relevant research data and theory to support critical evaluation. All sources referenced correctly • Review of origin, purpose, function and reputation of the product presented in a presented in a logical, concise and succinct manner Criterion 2: Effectiveness and originality of content in visual presentation - 40% Fail: • Incomplete execution and visual documentation • Very poor and non-self-explanatory presentation • Ineffective or incomprehensible visual communications Pass: • Adequate but basic execution and visual documentation • Basic slides with simple information, but lacking detail • Poor narrative Credit: • Competent execution and visual documentation • Well designed and clear slides, but lacking detail and strong narrative Distinction: • Compressive and detailed execution and visual documentation • Very well designed and clear slides with a strong narrative and detail High Distinction • Outstanding execution and visual documentation • Professional standard presentation with compelling narrative and high level of detail • Convincing and self-explanatory presentation Criterion 3: Quality of Presentation – 30% Fail: • Incomplete, poorly expressed and inadequate presentation Pass: • Adequate but basic presentation Credit: • Well-prepared and effectively presented presentation Distinction: • Highly engaging and very well-presented presentation High Distinction • Highly engaging and professional level presentation DIGITAL VISUALISATION Assessment 2