HAT304_T3_2019_Assessment_03_v2 Assessment Information COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969 This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business...

requirement


HAT304_T3_2019_Assessment_03_v2 Assessment Information COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969 This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd ABN 86 098 181 947 is a registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B. Assessment 3 Information Subject Code: HAT304 Subject Name: Emerging Issues in Hospitality and Tourism Assessment Title: Individual Proposal Assessment Type: Length: Written Report 1500 (+/- 10% allowable range) Weighting: 40% Total Marks: Submission: 100 Online via Turnitin Due Date: Week 13 Your task You are then required to develop and propose a policy draft that you would recommend to the key stakeholders of the Hospitality and Tourism Industry. Assessment Description The purpose of this individual proposal is to develop students’ skills in examining contemporary tourism and hospitality issues from legal and regulatory perspectives. This will enable students to apply learned theories, concepts and tools in weeks 10 to 12 to a real-world case. Assessment Instructions Choose the most recent disaster that has had a significant impact on the Hospitality and Tourism Industry. In making this choice, you are to conduct preliminary research to determine the availability of information. If you find that the number of credible sources about your chosen disaster is limited, please consult your workshop facilitator to discuss an alternative. Please note that the date range of the literature must not exceed five years. Once you have gathered a wide range of sources, you are required to identify and examine the legal and regulatory factors that a tourism/hospitality governing body must consider in the future to minimise/avoid the negative impacts of such disaster. More specifically, you are required to report on the following aspects: • A concise overview of the disaster and its impact on the hospitality and tourism sector (300 words) • Critically examine and analyse legal and regulatory issues that may have contributed to the impact of this disaster (400 words). • Propose a policy draft for hospitality and tourism governing bodies by stating its objectives, and involved stakeholders (400 words). • Provide a validation statement in which you must justify your recommended policy draft and its significance (400 words). In creating your report, you will need to use at least 12 sources of information that are referenced in accordance with Kaplan Harvard Referencing Guide. These may include corporate websites, government publications, industry reports, census data, journal articles, and newspaper articles. Assessment Information COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969 This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd ABN 86 098 181 947 is a registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B. Assignment Submission This file must be submitted as a ‘Word’ document to avoid any technical issues that may occur from incorrect file format upload. Uploaded files with a virus will not be considered as a legitimate submission. Turnitin will notify you if there is an issue with the submitted file. In this case, you must contact your workshop facilitator via email and provide a brief description of the issue and a screenshot of the Turnitin error message. You are also encouraged to submit your work well in advance of the deadline to avoid any possible delay with the Turnitin similarity report or any other technical difficulties that may occur. Late assignment submission penalties Penalties will be imposed on late assignment submissions in accordance with Kaplan Business School “late assignment submission penalties” policy. Number of days Penalty 1* - 9 days 5% per day for each calendar day late deducted from the total marks available 10 - 14 days 50% deducted from the total marks available. After 14 days Assignments that are submitted more than 14 calendar days after the due date will not be accepted, and the student will receive a mark of zero for the assignment(s). Note Notwithstanding the above penalty rules, assignments will also be given a mark of zero if they are submitted after assignments have been returned to students *Assignments submitted at any stage within the first 24 hours after the deadline will be considered to be one day late and therefore subject to the associated penalty For more information, please read the full policy via https://www.kbs.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/KBS_Assessment-Policy_June-2019_Final.pdf https://www.kbs.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/KBS_Assessment-Policy_June-2019_Final.pdf Assessment Information COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969 This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd ABN 86 098 181 947 is a registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B. Important Study Information Academic Integrity Policy KBS values academic integrity. All students must understand the meaning and consequences of cheating, plagiarism and other academic offences under the Academic Integrity and Conduct Policy. What is academic integrity and misconduct? What are the penalties for academic misconduct? What are the late penalties? How can I appeal my grade? Click here for answers to these questions: http://www.kbs.edu.au/current-students/student-policies/. Word Limits for Written Assessments Submissions that exceed the word limit by more than 10% will cease to be marked from the point at which that limit is exceeded. Study Assistance Students may seek study assistance from their local Academic Learning Advisor or refer to the resources on the MyKBS Academic Success Centre page. Click here for this information. . http://www.kbs.edu.au/current-students/student-policies/ https://elearning.kbs.edu.au/course/view.php?id=1481 COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969 This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd ABN 86 098 181 947 is a registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B. HAT304 Assessment 3 Marking Rubric – Individual Proposal 40% Marking Criteria F (Fail) 0-49% P (Pass) 50-64% C (Credit) 65-74% D (Distinction) 75-84% HD (High Distinction) 85-100% An overview of the disaster __/10 marks You provide an overview of of the chosen disaster and its impacts that is not clear and/or vague. You provide a somewhat clear overview of the chosen disaster and its impacts. You provide a mostly clear overview of the chosen disaster and its impacts. You provide a clear overview of the chosen disaster and its impacts. You provide a concise overview of the chosen disaster and its impacts. Critical Analysis __/20 marks Your analysis does not satisfactorily identify and/or examines the legal and regulatory issues associated with the chosen disaster. Your analysis partially identifies and examines the legal and regulatory issues associated with the chosen disaster. Your analysis satisfactorily identifies and examines the legal and regulatory issues associated with the chosen disaster. Your analysis strongly identifies and examines the legal and regulatory issues associated with the chosen disaster. Your analysis critically identifies and thoroughly examines legal and regulatory issues associated with the chosen disaster. Proposed Policy Draft __/10 marks You provide a policy draft that is not clear and/or vague, with a minimal or non-existent statement of its objectives and/or involved stakeholders. You provide a somewhat clear policy draft by stating its objectives and/or involved stakeholders. You provide a mostly clear policy draft by stating its objectives and involved stakeholders. You propose a clear policy draft by stating its objectives and involved stakeholders. You propose a concise policy draft by stating its objectives and involved stakeholders. Use of sources/supportive evidence __/10 marks Your research lacks focus because of an unsuitable choice of sources. You have selected some appropriate sources. Better use of quality sources would help focus your research. Your research is focused, drawn from an appropriate range of sources. It is obvious that your research is focused, complemented by a quality selection and range of sources. It is clearly obvious that your research is extensive and focused, complemented by a quality selection and range of sources. Validation Statement __/20 marks Your statement has limited and/or unsuitable justification. Limited evaluation that somewhat justifies your