Criteria
|
Unsatisfactory
24.27.9
|
Somewhat Acceptable
28-31.9
|
Acceptable
32-35.9
|
Highly Acceptable
36-40
|
|
Abstract
|
Missing abstract.
|
Needs more organization and clarity with specific criteria.
|
Contains a purpose related to the topic with specified criteria for interview
|
Contains a clear purpose of writing relating to the selected topic with specified criteria for interview.
|
____
|
Body
|
The paper has no clear points.
|
The paper has limited support of evidence from assignment. Limited use of terms, theories, and questions leaving the paper with adequate information.
|
The paper has most of the main points to support evidence from assignment. Uses terms, theories, and questions that elicits good information.
|
The paper includes all of the main points with supporting evidence from assignment. Uses terms, theories, strong and strong questions and connects the interviewees information.
|
____
|
Conclusion
|
There is no clear conclusion.
|
Conclusion is weak and does not include learned information.
|
The student includes most of the information set in the assignment.
|
Paper includes specific information set in assignment.
|
____
|
Reference Page: Minimum of 3 references and in APA format.
|
Student does not have a reference page.
|
The paper contains only one reference and/or it is not referenced in APA format.
|
The paper contains only two references and they are not referenced in APA format.
|
Student has a minimum of 3 different references and all references are in APA format throughout the paper.
|
____
|
Research
|
No current research support.
|
Some current research support but vague in importance to this paper's objective and lacks depth and clarity.
|
Good current research support with adequate impact to this paper's objective with some depth and clarity.
|
Excellent current research support that is fully compliant with this paper's objectives with depth and clarity.
|
|
Works cited and referenced
|
One or both absent or lacking proper documentation.
|
Both present but lacking in quality/quantity and proper documentation.
|
Both present and written in proper documentation. quality/quantity is questionable.
|
Both present written properly and has excellent depth of research information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total---->
|