Content HD+ 10 points HD 8 points D 7 points C 6 points P 5 points N 2.5 points N-LOW 0 points Cover Page With Automatic Table Of Contents, Cover Letter, Executive Summary and Background of the...

group assighmentits about opening a australian company bunnings opening in Indiaso I just needStakeholders and Stakeholder Analysis this part onlyyou just need to complete the template for me its only 300 - 400 even less1st file is assignment rubrics 2nd file is uncompleted assignment so I just need my part to be done
u can have an idea also by looking that file its got template in it just have to complete with some ideas

3rd file is just tempelate


Content HD+ 10 points HD 8 points D 7 points C 6 points P 5 points N 2.5 points N-LOW 0 points Cover Page With Automatic Table Of Contents, Cover Letter, Executive Summary and Background of the Business Case Outstanding cover page and automatic table of Contents. Outstanding Cover Letter and Executive Summary of the business case. Outstanding Introduction and background of the business case. Excellent cover page and automatic table of Contents. Excellent cover letter and executive Summary of the business case. Excellent introduction and background of the business case. Very good cover page and automatic table of Contents. Very good cover letter and executive Summary of the business case. Very good introduction and background of the business case. Good cover page and automatic table of Contents. Good cover letter and executive summary of the business case. Good introduction and background of the business case. Satisfactory cover page and automatic table of Contents. Satisfactory cover letter and executive summary of the business case. Satisfactory introduction and background of the business case. Poor cover page and automatic table of Contents. Poor cover letter and executive summary of the business case. Poor introduction and background of the business case. No cover page and automatic table of contents. No cover letter and executive summary of the business case is submitted. Superficial/or no introduction and background of the business case. Distinct CSR element, Evidence of International Business Initiative with an Asian Focus, Business Case Definition and Business Case SWOT, PESTEL & Stakeholder Analysis Outstanding attempt to show the element of CSR with the evidence of international business initiative and Asian focus. Outstanding identification and description of the internal, micro and macro environmental factors that could influence the project outcome. Outstanding Stakeholder Analysis. Excellent attempt to show the element of CSR with the evidence of international business initiative and Asian focus. Excellent identification and description of the internal, micro and macro environmental factors that could influence the project outcome. Excellent Stakeholder Analysis. Very good attempt to show the element of CSR with the evidence of international business initiative and Asian focus. Very good identification and description of the internal, micro and macro environmental factors that could influence the project outcome. Very good Stakeholder Analysis. Good attempt to show the element of CSR with the evidence of international business initiative and Asian focus. Good identification and description of the internal, micro and macro environmental factors that could influence the project outcome. Good Stakeholder Analysis. Satisfactory attempt to show the element of CSR with the evidence of international business initiative and Asian focus. Satisfactory identification and description of the internal, micro and macro environmental factors that could influence the project outcome. Poor attempt to show the element of CSR with the evidence of international business initiative and Asian focus. Poor identification and description of the internal, micro and macro environmental factors that could influence the project outcome. No attempt to show the element of CSR with the evidence of international business initiative and Asian focus. Identification and description of the internal, micro and macro environmental factors that could influence the project outcome was not provided. Feasibility Analysis- Industry, Market, Competitors, Suppliers, Customers, Logistics and Operations Outstanding feasibility analysis. Excellent feasibility analysis. Very good feasibility analysis. Good feasibility analysis. Satisfactory quality feasibility analysis. Poor feasibility analysis. Feasibility analysis not provide Comprehensive Program Logic Model, Listing all SMART Objectives, Relevant activities, Outputs and Outcomes, Gantt Chart Outstanding Program Logic Model with SMART Objectives, Relevant Activities, Outputs and Outcomes. Outstanding Gantt Chart Excellent Program Logic Model with SMART Objectives, Relevant Activities, Outputs and Outcomes. Excellent Gantt Chart Very Good Program Logic Model with SMART Objectives, Relevant Activities, Outputs and Outcomes. Very good Gantt Chart. Good Program Logic Model with SMART objectives, Relevant Activities, Outputs and Outcomes. Good Gantt Chart. Satisfactory Program Logic Model with SMART Objectives, Relevant Activities, Outputs and Outcomes. Satisfactory Gantt Chart. Poor Program Logic Model with SMART Objectives, Relevant Activities, Outputs and Outcomes. Poor Gantt Chart. Program Logic Model not provided. Gantt Chart not provided. Comprehensive/Relevant Human & Physical Resources, Budget Credible and Based on Human and Physical Resources, Including Immediate/Once Off, Month by Month and 3 Years Summary with Evidence of Research Outstanding Human and Physical Resources Provided. Outstanding budget. All figures are appropriately referenced and explained Excellent Quality of the Human and Physical Resources. Excellent quality of the budget. All budget figures are based on the provided human and physical resources. Very Good Quality of the Human and Physical Resources. Good Quality of the Human and Physical Resources. Very detailed budget. Most budget figures are based on the provided human and physical resources. Good Quality of the Human and Physical Resources. Good quality of the budget. Some budget figures are not based on the provided human and physical resources. Satisfactory Quality of the Human and Physical Resources. Satisfactory quality of the budget. Most figures are not based on the provided human and physical resources. Poor Quality of the Human and Physical Resources. Poor Quality of the Budget. Budget is Not Based on the Provided Human and Physical Resources. Human and Physical Resources not provided Budget not Provided. No evidence of research and explanation. All figures are appropriately referenced and explained Most figures are appropriately referenced and explained Some figures are not appropriately referenced and/ or explained. Evidence of Research is somewhat satisfactory. Evidence of research is very poor. Appendix: Business Case Project Team, Project Management Methodology and Other Relevant Appendices Outstanding business case project team. Outstanding business case project team and project management methodology. Excellent business case project team. Excellent Business Case project team and Project Management Methodology. Very good business case project team. Very good business case project team and project management methodology. Good business case project team. Good business case project team and project management methodology. Satisfactory business case project team. Satisfactory business case project team and project management methodology. Poor quality of Business Case Team. Poor quality of business case project team and project management methodology. Business Case Project Team not Provided. Business case project team and project management methodology not provided. Writing, Style & Submission HD+ 10 points HD 8 points D 7 points C 6 points P 5 points N 2.5 points N-LOW 0 points Professional Standard of Writing, Spelling, Grammar, Punctuation and Template Requirements: 2cm Margin, 12 Point Arial for Body, Spacing, Consistent Heading Style Outstanding standard of writing, spelling, grammar and punctuation and template requirements Outstanding clarity and structure. Excellent standard of writing, spelling, grammar and punctuation and template requirements Excellent clarity and structure. Very Good standard of writing, spelling, grammar and punctuation and template requirements Very Good clarity and structure. Good standard of writing, spelling, grammar and punctuation and template requirements Good clarity and structure. Satisfactory standard of writing, spelling, grammar and punctuation and template requirements Satisfactory clarity and structure. Poor standard of writing, spelling, grammar and punctuation and template requirements Poor clarity and structure. Very poor standard of writing, spelling, grammar and punctuation and template requirements No Clarity and no structure. Timely Submission - All Submission Requirements are Satisfied as Stated in the Unit Guide Outstanding and timely submission. Excellent and timely submission. Very Good and timely submission. Good and timely submission. Satisfactory and timely submission. Only some submission requirements are followed as stated in the unit guide and or late submission. Submission requirements were not followed as stated in the unit guide and late submission. Referencing HD+ 10 points HD 8 points D 7 points C 6 points P 5 points N 2.5 points N-LOW 0 points In text References and End References According to Harvard Style. Outstanding use of Harvard Style Referencing. Excellent use of Harvard Style Referencing. Very Good use of Harvard Style Referencing. Good use of Harvard Style Referencing. You have some minor inconsistencies with the Harvard Style use. Satisfactory use of Harvard Style Referencing. You have followed the Harvard Style Referencing but have some inconsistencies. Minimal attempt to use Harvard Style Referencing. Harvard style referencing has not been followed consistently. Major deficiency in use of Harvard Style Referencing. No attempt to use Harvard Style Referencing. Quality and the