For this assignment, complete the Problem presented on page XXXXXXXXXXalso below) in the text. See page 380 for a general description of Marcus Welby Hospital . To seek shelter from the competitive...

1 answer below »

For this assignment, complete the Problem presented on page 432-433 (also below) in the text. See page 380 for a general description of Marcus Welby Hospital .

To seek shelter from the competitive storm, Marcus Welby Hospital (MWH) is considering forming a joint venture with an existing for-profit HMO. MWH would be given 30 percent ownership of the privately held HMO, and each of its five board of trustees members would be given 1 percent ownership, in exchange for MWH contributing $10 million in capital funds, which is 35 percent of the HMO's appraised net worth. Since the HMO already owns its own nursing home, MWH will raise the capital by selling its nursing home. MWH will receive 30 percent of whatever profit distributions the HMO board chooses to make from time to time and the trustees will receive their 1 percent shares. MWH also hopes to increase its patient base for hospital admissions and to secure a better bargaining position for reimbursements from the HMO, but the HMO is making no promises about where its subscribers will be sent for hospital care, nor how it will pay MWH for hospital services to its subscribers.


Assume that MWH has articles of incorporation similar to Queen of Angels' only covering nursing home as well as hospital services, and that it has received only general, unrestricted gifts from donors. Also, assume there is no other management or personal connection between MWH and the HMO.




  • What issues would you want to alert the hospital board to concerning whether this is a permissible venture, and how the HMO can use its capital funds?


  • Would these parties be advised to have the HMO pledge some portion of its revenues to pay for charity care services at MWH( below ispage 380 title; THE HISTORY OF MARCUS WELBY HOSPITAL AND HOW IT GREW)


  • This hypothetical serves as the basis for several of the problems in the readings that follow. It illustrates the profound transformations that have occurred in the health care sector over the last half-century.


    Marcus Welby Hospital (MWH) Is a private, nonprofit 400-bed facility employing more than 2,000 workers, with more than $100million in annual revenues. It is located on the outskirts of a metropolitan area of one million people that contains three other major tertiary care hospitals of 300 beds or more and four smaller, community hospitals of 100 to 150 beds. Currently, 38 percent of MWH’s gross revenues are from Medicare, 12 percent are from Medicaid, 40 percent from private insurance or out-of-pockets payments. The remaining 10 percent is bad debt or charity care partially subsidized by a major protestant denomination with which it has long been affiliated.


    March Welby Hospital was born in the 1950s as a small community hospital. It began as an effort by persons from the local church and medical communities joining forces with local business leaders to provide convenient hospital care in the growing suburbs. When the federal Hill Burton program created a reservoir of construction loan in the 1950s, the group of town booster choose to apply for a construction loan to build a 100- bed facility. Its affiliation with the religious domination has never been formalized through ownership. Nevertheless, the charitable role of the hospital is taken seriously by the board of directors, which always includes one or two members of the denomination.


    In the latter 1960s, increased revenues through Medicare program enabled the hospital to obtain further construction loans, and the hospital expanded to add 100 more beds and more supplicated inpatient services. Another wave of change swept through the health care industry in the 1980s, in response to a fundamental alteration in the way Medicare pays hospitals. Some hospitals consolidated, whereas Marcus Welby sought to diversify operations and increase its patient base by providing a wider range of services and much larger.




  • assingment 2.






  • Choosing



    Complete the Problem on page 459 in the text. Submit your solution to your instructor. See page 380 for a general description of Marcus Welby Hospital .


    Marcus Welby Hospital has decided to form an HMO in which it wants to give physicians a major stake, in order to foster allegiance and encourage cost-effective treatment. You are consulted as a legal and management expert to advise the hospital on the consequences of forming the HMO as a nonprofit versus a for-profit entity.
    What are the relevant considerations with respect to tax exemption, the ability to raise capital, the role of physicians, and operational constraints





  • assingment 3






  • Economic Credentialing



    Complete the Problem beginning on page 484 of your text titled “Problem: Economic Credentialing” in a two page paper.. Submit the completed assignment to your instructor. See page 380 for a general description of Marcus Welby Hospital .


    You are the lawyer for Marcus Welby Community Hospital . The administrator approaches you about how to amend the bylaws so that the hospital can get rid of doctors who are costing the hospital too much money under Medicare and HMO insurance. The administrator is concerned about which removal actions can be defended in court and which bylaw amendments are politically feasible with physicians. Advise the administrator on each of these options:



    • Amend the Hospital Bylaws to give the hospital board authority to remove doctors from the medical staff for any reason, regardless of the medical staff's own recommendations, as long as the medical staff is first consulted.

    • Amend the Medical Staff Bylaws to declare that an additional criterion for medical staff membership is to practice an efficient style of medicine that avoids wasting medical resources or providing unnecessary care.

    • Forget about amending any bylaws. Instead, go after physicians who are economic losers based on their general medical competence and their unwillingness to be cooperative.

    • Keep but supplant the entire medical staff structure by limiting who can practice in each department through one-year renewable contracts with the 200 best doctors out of the present 300.



    Note that the assignment asks you to comment on each of the options, not just one. You may comment on one option being better than another for some reason, but be sure to comment on all the options





  • assingment 4





  • Negotiating Contract



    Complete the assignment beginning page 507 titled “Exercise: Negotiating a Managed Care Contract” in a two to four page paper. Submit the assignment to your instructor. For a general description of Marcus Welby Hospital see page 380 of the text. The assignment below makes some adaptations to the text to clarify expectations for your paper.


    One of Marcus Welby Hospital 's (MWH) competitors established a successful IPA-model HMO two years ago. Fearing loss of patients, MWH is forming the Marcus Welby Managed Care Network (the Network). The objective is to sign up a number of physicians, mainly in primary care but also in common specialties, and then to market this network to these two sources: (1) large employers who provide health insurance to their workers on a self-insured basis; and (2) large regional or national insurance companies (such as Blue Cross) who then offer the network to their customers.


    The Network is approaching each physician group individually and asking them to sign up nonexclusively, leaving them free to sign up with other networks or HMOs. The contract excerpts on pages 507 and following contain some common sticking points in these negotiations. Read each pairing of contract options and determine what is at stake. Then, assume the position of lawyer/negotiator for either (a) the Network or (b) a physician group who wants to sign up but is concerned about the details.



    • Write in your paper what you would say in a meeting with a representative from the other side and

    • Describe how you would hammer out a deal, either adopting one version or the other, or making any changes you want.

    • You must therefore be able to write clearly about what the concerns of the other side would be

    • assingment 5 Fraud and Abuse


    • Complete the Problem on page 599 of the text as a two to four page paper. For a general description of Marcus Welby Hospital see page 380 of the text.


      You are outside counsel to the Marcus Welby Healthcare Corporation, which among its other operations owns a durable medical equipment (DME) subsidiary, which sells equipment for home use such as crutches, wheelchairs, and oxygen concentrators. You learn that the subsidiary has had certain business practices about which you have some question under the Medicare and Medicaid Anti-Fraud and Abuse provisions:



      • Salesmen regularly offer home health agency employees a “premium” whenever their clients order DME from the subsidiary.

      • The subsidiary offers “rebates” to patients who use its equipment.

      • The subsidiary pays hospital and home health agency personnel for assisting its patients in learning how to use its products.


      Some arterial blood gas test results may have been “massaged a bit” by the DME in order to facilitate Medicare payment for oxygen concentrators

    • assingment 6



    • Reverse Referral Fees



      Directions


      Complete the Problem at the top of page 599 “Reverse Referral Fees” as a two page paper. For a general description of Marcus Welby Hospital see page 380 of the text. You are outside counsel to the Marcus Welby Healthcare Corporation (MWHC), which is concerned that expenses in some of its ancillary departments are causing it to lose money under Medicare and HMO insurance. It would like to start charging its hospital-based physicians for some of the costs of running their departments. Its current relationship with these physicians is one in which they have exclusive contracts to work in these departments, but no money changes hands between them. The hospital handles all billing, staffing, and overhead, but it bills separately for facility charges versus professional fees, and the physicians keep all the professional fees the hospital collects on their behalf. This is the standard practice in the industry. MWHC has the following suggestions for changing this arrangement:



      • • Have the radiology group pay for services, supplies, personnel, utilities, maintenance, and billing services furnished by the hospital. In a non-hospital, office-based setting, this package would normally cost about $100,000 to $150,000 per year. The hospital will charge the radiology group only $25,000 at first, but increase the charges to $100,000 over four years. Payments are due only if the hospital's gross revenue derived from radiology services exceeds $1,000,000 in the previous year.

      • • The hospital's clinical laboratory, under the direction of the pathology group, would pay the hospital a 20 percent fee for “specimen collection and handling services” when a physician on the MWHC medical staff orders a test from the clinical lab.

      • .




    ATTENTION; all listed assingment require you to use page 380 of the text of which I have typed above.

Answered Same DayDec 29, 2021

Answer To: For this assignment, complete the Problem presented on page XXXXXXXXXXalso below) in the text. See...

Robert answered on Dec 29 2021
124 Votes
1

Introduction
The aim of this assignment is to present an analysis on the hospital named as Marcus Welby.
From this perspective, this is an analysis of the case with issues identified and presented for a
discrete overview of the hospital. This analysis proceeds with describing the issues identified
along with the problems causing the issues and how this issue can be deal with. The assignment
consists of background of the hospital in order to deliver some discrete information on the same
(Mezirow 1991).
Assignment 1
1. Now, from the background of MWH as well as HMO who are dealing together in a joint
venture, need to identify themselves as
those two organizations where the aspects of these
organizations do not combine together in a bond but there are profits shared along with
deliverance of various aspects which need to be published in accordance to the objectives
of the hospital. This does not mean that there do not exist any favorable profits enjoyed
by one and not by other but this includes the knowledge which needs to be attained and
the promises which are needed to be made (Hart and Johnson 2007).
In the many years of the past, it has been evidently seen that joint ventures related to hospitals
and the arrangements lying behind it has increasingly become popular. The competition in
smaller community towns grows significantly and this has to be dealt with because in a small
community there are various hospitals which develop and in these hospitals there lies significant
incidents of failures of hospitals in order to tackle to the demands of the competition by the
nonexempt large hospitals which develop in multi institutional ways in the framework of hospital
derivatives. This signifies that in order to deal with the exemption from taxes a force is important
2

to be dealt with innovation along with dramatic steps undertaken towards maintenance as well as
expansion of the bases of their patients (. When HMO enters into the realms of joint venture with
a group of physicians, the physician and hospital ties a bond together with each other playing
towards an ethical natural strengthening aspect incorporating the referral network which is
important to derive the success of HMO and this has to be reinforced. The allowance which joint
venture will provide to HMO will be in terms of natural expansion as well as breadth of the
services which are derived often receiving the same at a cost which is lower than the ones which
are incurred generally in the realms of independent ventures being undertaken in order to depict
a venture which is safe as well as independent with added expertise of conjecturers which have
complete specialization. This arrangement would give the hospitals that provision which makes
the capital financial new venture to arise from a source that has complete source of finances
together with capital. The focus from this point of view, is that, there is a focus on primary
consideration of tax facing the exemption towards hospitals while planning the joint ventures
with an entity which is taxable having no relation with depicted aspects in order to deliver a
portfolio significance that has the basis along with internal revenue service being repeated
consistently towards the arrangements which are new to the scrutiny which is special. He
suspicion of the IRS which does not allow the hospitals to be completely applicable to the
portfolio of hospitals unless they have a containment of technicalities which have benefits that
are not deserved from the physician as well as the hospitals point of view. This depicts that there
is a standard scrutiny which is strict and HMO has to deal with this consistent attitude in order to
obtain a blessing in the field on joint venture with MWH (Hart 2004).
In addition to the issue of taxation faced by MWH, there are other issues which have to be
determined by the following laws and legal issues determined. MWH will get abandoned from
3

the strategy which is losing of practices getting acquired. There are many proposals developing
into joint ventures that need to consider the threshold of discussions that lay between the
potentials from the perspectives of both the parties involved. The parties involved are MWH as
well as HMO (Andreassen and Olsen 2006).
References
McKenzie, W. (1999). Multiple Intelligences Survey. Retrieved 01/11/2002 from
http://surfaquarium.com/MIinvent.htm
McLellan, H. (Ed.). (1996). Situated learning perspectives. Englewood Cliffs: NJ: Educational
Technology Publications.
Merriam, S.B. and Caffarella, R. S. (1991). Learning in Adulthood: A Comprehensive Guide. San
Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Merrill, M. David. Component Display Theory. Retrieved September 19, 2003 from
http://tecfa.unige.ch/themes/sa2/act-app-dos2-fic-component.htm
2. Yes, the parties should be advised to provide some portion of the revenues to HMO to
pay for the care services of charity at MWH as the venture which is joint should be equal
in accordance to the articles of incorporation and the coverage of this consists in the
nursing home along with the services of hospital receiving general gifts which are not
restricted in nature.
Assignment 2
4

This question addresses the considerations in the case with respect to exemption of tax, role of
physicians, raise in capital and the constraints of operations.
The contribution of physicians have 50 per cent of the capital receiving aspect participating in
the realm of decision making which is ultimate. Towards obtaining the tax exemption from
declaring the aspects which operate in a manner which is consistent with the purpose of
exemption of the assurance is to exempt the determined aspects delivering the in which the
hospital of MWH would be consistent towards obtaining the end which is front in order to
consider the aspects of charity which determine the provision of technicality (Bloom 2006).
When the decision making aspects become important an resolution of dispute procedure has to
be adopted by the board members of MWH in which efficiency along with inexpensive attributes
are a part of. The agreement of joint venture is provided to mediate in the way which is private
under the experience of guided aspects in the joint venture which is personal with arbitration
leading towards the issues getting solved in the most acceptable ways. A head on question has to
be faced by physicians of both the groups of ventures in the joint considerations. There need to
be engagement in the activities completing all the aspects of joint venture. The consideration...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here