Find the regression equation, letting overhead width be the predictor (x) variable. Find the best predicted weight of a seal if the overhead width measured from a photograph is 2 cm. Can the...


Find the regression​ equation, letting overhead width be the predictor​ (x) variable. Find the best predicted weight of a seal if the overhead width measured from a photograph is


2

cm. Can the prediction be​ correct? What is wrong with predicting the weight in this​ case? Use a significance level of


0.05.

Find the regression equation, letting overhead width be the predictor (x) variable. Find the best predicted weight of a seal if the overhead width measured from a photograph is 2 cm. Can the prediction be correct? What is wrong with predicting the weight in this case? Use a significance level of 0.05.<br>Overhead Width (cm)<br>7.4<br>7.8<br>8.7<br>9.6<br>7.9<br>8.8<br>Weight (kg)<br>144<br>190<br>224<br>237<br>184<br>229<br>E Click the icon to view the critical values of the Pearson correlation coefficient r.<br>The regression equation is y =D+x.<br>(Round to one decimal place as needed.)<br>The best predicted weight for an overhead width of 2 cm is<br>kg.<br>(Round to one decimal place as needed.)<br>Can the prediction be correct? What is wrong with predicting the weight in this case?<br>O A. The prediction cannot be correct because a negative weight does not make sense and because there is not sufficient evidence of a linear correlation.<br>O B. The prediction cannot be correct because a negative weight does not make sense. The width in this case is beyond the scope of the available sample data.<br>O C. The prediction cannot be correct because there is not sufficient evidence of a linear correlation. The width in this case is beyond the scope of the available sample data.<br>O D. The prediction can be correct. There is nothing wrong with predicting the weight in this case.<br>

Extracted text: Find the regression equation, letting overhead width be the predictor (x) variable. Find the best predicted weight of a seal if the overhead width measured from a photograph is 2 cm. Can the prediction be correct? What is wrong with predicting the weight in this case? Use a significance level of 0.05. Overhead Width (cm) 7.4 7.8 8.7 9.6 7.9 8.8 Weight (kg) 144 190 224 237 184 229 E Click the icon to view the critical values of the Pearson correlation coefficient r. The regression equation is y =D+x. (Round to one decimal place as needed.) The best predicted weight for an overhead width of 2 cm is kg. (Round to one decimal place as needed.) Can the prediction be correct? What is wrong with predicting the weight in this case? O A. The prediction cannot be correct because a negative weight does not make sense and because there is not sufficient evidence of a linear correlation. O B. The prediction cannot be correct because a negative weight does not make sense. The width in this case is beyond the scope of the available sample data. O C. The prediction cannot be correct because there is not sufficient evidence of a linear correlation. The width in this case is beyond the scope of the available sample data. O D. The prediction can be correct. There is nothing wrong with predicting the weight in this case.
Jun 08, 2022
SOLUTION.PDF

Get Answer To This Question

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here