Final Individual Project Reflection and Evaluation
Format:MS Word document only.
(My role in Project: Besides assisting in Planning, my role also involve in content creation, designing and assist in Training, conducting meetings, resource gathering)
Instructions
This assignment consists of (i) a written report
1. Written Report (Instruction)
This report will be greater than 1000 words asthere is much you need to include by way of addressing each of the Course and Unit Learning Outcomes (see above) and the marking rubric.
The format can be anything you feel is appropriate, but given the audience, you should seek to be professional and factual.
Your project update should contain following core elements:
1. Introduction
2. Project Overview
3. Aprogress reportsummarising whether the project is behind schedule, on schedule, or ahead of schedule with respect to tasks and milestones. You may also include a summary of issues that have arisen and how these have been resolved together with a risk profile and quality summary linked to the project’s progress so far.
4. Astatus reportsummarising where the project, tasks and milestones are in relation to the status date. These should emphasise where you should be at the status date and, if you are not there, you should explain why not.
5. Aforecast completionreports focusing on the completion of the project against the plan, and your vision of project and personal success. The completion report should summarise the expected completion date and any revisions that may be necessary to achieve this. The completion report may also include forecasting produced from your scheduling software.
6. Conclusion
7. References
You should ideally aim to include the following aspects:
- A brief update of how the project originated (why, the benefits, who benefits, consequences of not running this project, etc.)
- Convey accurate, complete, and timely information to the stakeholders
- Reflect the true facts of the project’s progression *
- Track all the scope changes and revisions
- A summary of the project's performance (i.e. Cost Baseline and EVM calculations for that point in time, along with any other relevant information (e.g. Burn Down chart, Goal Tree, etc.)
- Facilitate problem-solving and decision-making
- Confirm that the project is on track in all respects
Hints and Tips
- APA 7threferencing standards will apply to all parts of this assessment.
General advice
The reflection should include the following areas with a detailed explanation in support of each heading. The explanation should include a critique of the process vis-a-vis theory.
- Role and individual execution of the project
- Role in creating and executing the communication plan
- Assessment of stakeholder needs
- Structure your reflection using a proven framework, e.g.
DIEP model
(D- describe what happened, I – interpret the events, E- evaluate the effectiveness and P – plan for the future). Use this framework in your writing report.
This requires students
ALWAYS to include the page number in both the in-text and end-of-text referencing.
Failure to do this may result in an academic integrity enquiry being made on your latest assignment submission(s).
Task 4: Individual Reflection (30%)
|
Criteria
|
Ratings
|
Ability to reflect on individual performance in a team, to deliver a successful project. ULO 1 PGCLO 3.2 Reflection on teamwork
|
6 to >4.74 pts
High Distinction
The individual report showed an outstanding level of excellence in reflecting on individual performance in a team, to deliver a successful project.
|
Demonstrate personal autonomy and accountability in the execution of an authentic project; ULO 2 PGCLO 4.1
|
6 to >4.74 pts
High Distinction
Using expert judgement, applies autonomous skills that contribute to a project team by proposing a very creative and original concept. Provides a very comprehensive explanation of the stages used in developing the project, supported by appropriate research and skills.
|
Apply knowledge and skills with initiative and/or creativity to accomplish project outcomes ULO 3 PGCLO 4.2
|
6 to >4.74 pts
High Distinction
Shows an exceptional understanding of the problem faced by the client and supports it with strong evidence; Provides detailed information on project requirements and offers a detailed and accurate post project analysis.. Accurately applies, synthesises and critically evaluates (where necessary) a range of appropriate research and skills.
|
Examine and assess the intended and unintended impacts on stakeholders ULO 4 PGCLO5.1
|
6 to >4.74 pts
High Distinction
The project identifies all stakeholders, their concerns and provides a deep analysis of the work impacts, providing workable and innovative solutions to address such issues
|
Consider ethical or social perspectives ULO 4 PGCLO5.2
|
3 to >2.37 pts
High Distinction
The reflection provides a deep and nuanced analysis of the ethical and social considerations.
|
Integrated communication Overall written communication. The use of functional language to suit the given context, to connect content and to convey discipline-specific meaning. ULO 2 PGCLO3.1 Written
|
3 to >2.37 pts
High Distinction
The written communication integrates functional language in a sophisticated and nuanced manner with the given context to create extensive and complex connections with content and convey discipline-specific meaning.
|