|
|
|
KNOWLEDGE & UNDERSTANDING
|
INTELLECTUAL & COGNITIVE SKILLS
|
Graduate Skills: transferable, employability, practical and academic skills
|
|
|
|
Factual and conceptual knowledge and understanding; use of class materials; independent reading
|
Critical thinking; conceptualisation; creativity; synthesis, analysis and evaluation; application; problem solving and research/investigation
|
Written, oral and presentation skills; interpersonal, group and teamwork skills; leadership skills; numeracy; digital skills; practical, professional and academic skills (including referencing/presentation
|
MARKING BAND
|
MODULE LEARNING OUTCOMES
|
CLASSIFICATION
|
WEIGHTED AT 45%
|
WEIGHTED AT 30%
|
WEIGHTED AT 25%
|
86 - 100%
|
Achieved at this level
|
FIRST (1ST)
|
Includes all required factual content, accurately summarised.
|
Well developed, relevant, reasoned introduction and conclusions.
|
Within word count or presentation time.
|
|
|
|
Includes relevant factual content only.
|
Clearly and logically structured material.
|
Accurate spelling, grammar, punctuation, paragraphing.
|
|
|
|
Accurate identification of relevant concepts, theories and/or principles, appropriate to this level.
|
Information or data selected from a good range of primary and secondary sources, and categorised, analysed or evaluated using relevant methods or techniques.
|
Fluent, interesting writing style, appropriate to the assignment OR engaging, confident, audible and well-paced presentation.
|
|
|
|
Excellent understanding of factual and conceptual material, relative to this level.
|
Well developed, coherent arguments, referencing primary and secondary literature.
|
Appropriate visual presentation, including font, spacing, margins, headings, graphics, images and appendices.
|
|
|
|
Calculations are accurate, clearly set out, with explanations.
|
Well-developed integration of theory and practice, for this level, using defined conceptual frameworks.
|
Correct use of academic conventions, references and bibliography.
|
|
|
|
Independent, wide-ranging reading and research, from both primary and secondary sources, appropriate to this level.
|
Very good application of numerical and statistical methods to defined problems.
|
Outstanding, consistent delivery of group work obligations, for this level.
|
|
|
|
|
Substantiated, relevant recommendations. Very good awareness of ethical issues, where relevant.
|
Insightful reflection on own strengths and weaknesses in relation to defined professional and practical skills.
|
70 - 85%
|
Achieved at this level
|
FIRST (1ST)
|
Includes all required factual content, accurately summarised.
|
Well developed, relevant introduction and conclusions.
|
Within word count or presentation time.
|
|
|
|
Includes relevant factual content only.
|
Clearly structured material.
|
Accurate spelling, grammar, punctuation, paragraphing.
|
|
|
|
Accurate identification of relevant concepts, theories and/or principles, appropriate to this level.
|
Information or data selected from relevant primary and secondary sources, and categorised, analysed or evaluated using relevant methods or techniques.
|
Fluent writing style, appropriate to the assignment OR engaging, audible and well-paced presentation.
|
|
|
|
Very good understanding of factual and conceptual material, relative to this level.
|
Coherent arguments, referencing primary and secondary literature.
|
Appropriate visual presentation, including font, spacing, margins, headings, graphics, images and appendices.
|
|
|
|
Calculations are accurate, clearly set out, with explanations.
|
Very good integration of theory and practice, for this level, using defined conceptual frameworks.
|
Correct use of academic conventions, references and bibliography.
|
|
|
|
Independent, wide-ranging reading and research, from both primary and secondary sources, appropriate to this level.
|
Good application of numerical and statistical methods to defined problems.
|
Very good, consistent delivery of group work obligations, for this level.
|
|
|
|
|
Relevant recommendations. Good awareness of ethical issues, where relevant.
|
Good reflection on own strengths and weaknesses in relation to defined professional and practical skills.
|
60 - 69%
|
Achieved at this level
|
UPPER SECOND (2:1)
|
Includes most required factual content, mostly accurately summarised.
|
Relevant introduction and conclusions.
|
Within word count or presentation time.
|
|
|
|
Includes relevant factual content only.
|
Clearly structured material.
|
Mostly accurate spelling, grammar, punctuation, paragraphing.
|
|
|
|
Mainly accurate identification of relevant concepts, theories and/or principles, appropriate to this level.
|
Information or data selected from some relevant primary and secondary sources, and categorised, analysed or evaluated using relevant methods or techniques but with some gaps or misunderstandings.
|
Mainly fluent writing style, appropriate to the assignment OR mainly engaging, audible and well paced presentation.
|
|
|
|
Sound understanding of factual and conceptual material, relative to this level.
|
Mostly coherent arguments, referencing primary and secondary literature.
|
Mostly appropriate visual presentation, including font, spacing, margins, headings, graphics, images and appendices.
|
|
|
|
Calculations are mainly accurate, mostly clearly set out, with mostly good explanations.
|
Good integration of theory and practice, for this level.
|
Mostly correct use of academic conventions, references and bibliography.
|
|
|
|
Independent reading and research from sufficient and mostly authoritative primary and secondary sources, appropriate to this level.
|
Mainly good application of numerical and statistical methods to defined problems, with some gaps, errors or misunderstandings.
|
Consistent delivery of group work obligations, for this level.
|
|
|
|
|
Some relevant recommendations. Satisfactory awareness of ethical issues, where relevant.
|
Clear reflection on own strengths and weaknesses in relation to defined professional and practical skills.
|
50 - 59%
|
Achieved at this level
|
LOWER SECOND (2:2)
|
Includes essential required factual content, but with some gaps or misunderstandings.
|
Adequate introduction and conclusions.
|
Within 10% of word count or presentation time.
|
|
|
|
Includes some irrelevant factual content.
|
Mostly clearly structured material.
|
Some mistakes in spelling, grammar, punctuation, paragraphing.
|
|
|
|
Some identification of relevant concepts, theories and/or principles, appropriate to this level.
|
Information or data selected from mainly secondary sources, and categorised, analysed or evaluated using mostly relevant methods or techniques but with gaps or misunderstandings.
|
Writing style is appropriate but not always fluent OR a presentation that is not always engaging, audible or well-paced.
|
|
|
|
Adequate understanding of factual and conceptual material, relative to this level.
|
Limited arguments, referencing mostly secondary literature.
|
Inconsistent visual presentation, including font, spacing, margins, headings, graphics, images and appendices.
|
|
|
|
Calculations may have inaccuracies, or issues relating to set out and explanation.
|
An adequate attempt to relate theory to practice, for this level, using defined conceptual frameworks.
|
Inconsistent use of academic conventions, references and bibliography.
|
|
|
|
Some independent reading and research from mainly secondary sources, appropriate to this level.
|
Adequate application of numerical and statistical methods to defined problems, with gaps, errors or misunderstandings.
|
Inconsistent delivery of group work obligations, for this level.
|
|
|
|
|
Basic recommendations. Satisfactory awareness of ethical issues, where relevant.
|
Some evaluation of own strengths and weaknesses in relation to defined professional and practical skills.
|
40 - 49%
|
Marginal achievement at this level
|
THIRD (3RD)
|
Includes limited required factual content, with many gaps or inaccuracies.
|
Basic introduction and conclusions.
|
Within 10% of word count or presentation time.
|
|
|
|
Includes considerable irrelevant factual content.
|
Unevenly structured material.
|
Frequent mistakes in spelling, grammar, punctuation, paragraphing.
|
|
|
|
Limited identification of relevant concepts, theories and/or principles, appropriate to this level.
|
Information or data selected from secondary sources, and poorly categorised, analysed or evaluated using inappropriate methods or techniques.
|
Awkward or inappropriate writing style OR a presentation that is not engaging, audible or well-paced.
|
|
|
|
Limited understanding of factual and conceptual material, relative to this level.
|
Sense of emerging argument, mainly descriptive or personal opinion, with little reference to literature.
|
Clear but inappropriate visual presentation, including font, spacing, margins, headings, graphics, images and appendices.
|
|
|
|
Calculations are often inaccurate, with many issues relating to set out and explanation.
|
Limited attempt to relate theory to practice, using defined conceptual frameworks.
|
Inconsistent or incomplete use of academic conventions, references and bibliography.
|
|
|
|
Limited independent reading and research from secondary sources, appropriate to this level.
|
Weak application of numerical and statistical methods to defined problems, with many gaps or errors.
|
Unreliable delivery of group work obligations, for this level.
|
|
|
|
|
Recommendations lack clarity or may be incomplete. Little awareness of ethical issues, where relevant.
|
Limited reflection on own strengths and weaknesses in relation to defined professional and practical skills.
|
30 - 39%
|
Marginal failure at this level
|
FAIL. POSSIBLE COMPENSATION.
|
Includes insufficient required factual content, with significant gaps or inaccuracies.
|
Incoherent or irrelevant introduction and conclusions.
|
More than 10% outside word count or presentation time.
|
|
|
|
Includes substantial irrelevant factual content.
|
Incoherently structured material.
|
Serious mistakes in spelling, grammar, punctuation, paragraphing.
|
|
|
|
Very limited or inaccurate identification of relevant concepts, theories and/or principles, appropriate to this level.
|
Little selection of information or data, and little attempt at collation, categorisation, analysis or evaluation.
|
Poor writing style OR a presentation that is not engaging, audible or well-paced.
|
|
|
|
Very limited understanding of factual and conceptual material, relative to this level.
|
Little or no argument, entirely descriptive or personal opinion, with no reference to literature.
|
Poor visual presentation, including font, spacing, margins, headings, graphics, images and appendices.
|
|
|
|
Calculations are mostly inaccurate, or incorrectly set out or explained.
|
Theory only sporadically related to practice, using defined conceptual frameworks.
|
Inaccurate or incomplete use of academic conventions, references and bibliography.
|
|
|
|
Minimal independent reading and research, appropriate to this level.
|
Very weak application of numerical and statistical methods to defined problems, with significant errors.
|
Poor delivery of group work obligations, for this level.
|
|
|
|
|
Irrelevant recommendations. Little or no awareness of ethical issues, where relevant.
|
Very limited reflection on own strengths and weaknesses in relation to defined professional and practical skills.
|
16 - 29%
|
Not achieved at this level
|
FAIL. NO COMPENSATION.
|
Includes almost no required factual content, and with very significant inaccuracies.
|
Incoherent or missing introduction and conclusions.
|
More than 10% outside word count or presentation time.
|
|
|
|
Includes mainly irrelevant factual content.
|
Very incoherently structured material.
|
Serious and extensive mistakes in spelling, grammar, punctuation, paragraphing.
|
|
|
|
No identification of relevant concepts, theories and/or principles.
|
No evidence of the selection, categorisation, analysis or evaluation of information or data.
|
Incoherent writing style OR an inaudible, poorly paced and unengaging presentation.
|
|
|
|
No understanding of factual and conceptual material, relative to this level.
|
No argument, entirely descriptive or personal opinion, with no reference to literature.
|
Very poor visual presentation, including font, spacing, margins, headings, graphics, images and appendices.
|
|
|
|
Calculations are inaccurate, with no explanations.
|
Theory not related to practice.
|
Very inaccurate or no use of academic conventions, references and bibliography.
|
|
|
|
No independent reading and research, appropriate to this level.
|
Minimal application of numerical and statistical methods and techniques to defined problems, with significant errors.
|
Very poor delivery of group work obligations, where relevant.
|
|
|
|
|
No recommendations. No awareness of ethical issues, where relevant.
|
Minimal or no evaluation of own strengths and weaknesses in relation to defined professional and practical skills.
|
0 - 15%
|
Not achieved at this level
|
FAIL. NO COMPENSATION.
|
Does not include required factual content.
|
No introduction and conclusions.
|
More than 10% outside word count or presentation time.
|
|
|
|
Includes entirely irrelevant factual content.
|
Very incoherently structured material.
|
Serious and extensive mistakes in spelling, grammar, punctuation, paragraphing.
|
|
|
|
No identification of relevant concepts, theories and/or principles.
|
No evidence of the selection, categorisation, analysis or evaluation of information or data.
|
Incoherent writing style OR an inaudible, poorly paced and unengaging presentation.
|
|
|
|
No understanding of factual and conceptual material.
|
No argument, entirely personal opinion, with no reference to literature.
|
Exceptionally poor visual presentation, including font, spacing, margins, headings, graphics, images and appendices.
|
|
|
|
Calculations are missing, with no explanations.
|
Theory not related to practice.
|
No use of academic conventions, references and bibliography.
|
|
|
|
No independent reading and research, appropriate to this level.
|
No application of numerical and statistical methods to defined problems.
|
No delivery of group work obligations, for this level.
|
|
|
|
|
No recommendations. No awareness of ethical issues, where relevant.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|