ASSESSMENT TEMPLATE___________________________________________________ Subject Title Sustainable Tourism Development Subject Code HOS803 Lecturer / Tutor Dr Chengeto Chaderopa Semester February 2019...

Extended literature review....thsi assignment is send part of order no 39724...so all the necessary articles are in thsi order no.. and use other resources as well..Based on your Assessment 2 Annotated Bibliography and also utilising other research, you are required to prepare an extended literature review addressing how contemporary issues are affecting the nature of sustainable tourism development and subsequently how this impacts on different stakeholders and management approaches.



ASSESSMENT TEMPLATE___________________________________________________ Subject Title Sustainable Tourism Development Subject Code HOS803 Lecturer / Tutor Dr Chengeto Chaderopa Semester February 2019 Semester Assessment Title Individual Assignment - Report Learning Outcome/s 2, 3 & 5 Assessment type (group or individual) Individual Weighting 50% Word count 3000 words excluding references and appendices Due date Week 14 Class submission Lecture ☐ Tutorial ☐ Submission type Paper copy ☐ Turnitin ☒ Format / Layout of Assessment . Due date Week 14 Class submission Lecture ☐ Tutorial ☐ Submission type Paper copy ☐ Turnitin x Format / Layout of Assessment Report: ICMS Cover Page Table of Contents Synopsis / Executive Summary Introduction Findings Conclusion Recommendations Reference List Appendices x x x x x x x x Essay: ICMS Cover Page Abstract Introduction Body Conclusion Recommendations Reference List Appendices ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Oral Presentation: Paper submission PowerPoint submission Peer review (group presentation) Reference List ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Other: (outline specific details here – use check boxes) Assessment instructions Based on your Assessment 2 Annotated Bibliography and also utilising other research, you are required to prepare an extended literature review addressing how contemporary issues are affecting the nature of sustainable tourism development and subsequently how this impacts on different stakeholders and management approaches. Readings for the assessment (instructions where they can be found e.g. MyAthens database, Moodle etc.) Grading Criteria / Rubric Peer Review Evaluation (group work – optional) Page 2 of 2 Annotated Bibliography Grading Rubric HOS803-Assessment 3- Extended Literature Review Grading Rubric HD D CR P F Abstract The abstract expertly demonstrates an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources. The abstract demonstrates an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources. The abstract fairly demonstrates an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources. The abstract vagues demonstrates an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources. The abstract weakly demonstrates an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources. 10% Introduction The topic is introduced, and groundwork is laid as to the direction of the review. Major ideas about sustainable tourism are expertly discussed leaving the reader with a very clear understanding of the progress made in this field of sustainable tourism development. Readers are aware of the overall problem, challenge, or topic of the review. The introduction leaves the reader with a clear understanding of the progress made in this field of sustainable tourism development Neither implicit nor explicit reference is made to the topic or purpose of the review. The introduction leaves the reader with a fair/average understanding of the progress made in this field of sustainable tourism development Vague exposition of topic of review. The objectives of the literature review are not clearly explained. The concept of sustainable tourism development is not articulated well. Very weak description of the focus of the review. The Introduction does not provide a clear exposition of the concept of sustainable tourism development. 15% Coverage of Content Sections: 1.Introduction 2. Methods 3.Findings 4.Results The review expertly reviews the major sections of the articles The review reviews the major sections of the articles The review fairly reviews the major sections of the articles The review does not provide a comprehensive review of the major sections of the articles. The review does not provide a comprehensive and coherent analytical review of the major sections of the articles. 30 % Reflection Outstanding of critical appraisal showing how the articles develop an understanding of how contemporary issues are affecting the nature of sustainable tourism development and subsequently how this impacts on different stakeholders and management approaches. Evidence of critical appraisal of how the cited sources develop understanding of how contemporary issues are affecting the nature of sustainable tourism development and subsequently how this impacts on different stakeholders and management approaches. Some evidence of appraisal of how the cited sources develop understanding of how contemporary issues are affecting the nature of sustainable tourism development and subsequently how this impacts on different stakeholders and management approaches. Very little evidence of how the cited sources develop understanding of how contemporary issues are affecting the nature of sustainable tourism development and subsequently how this impacts on different stakeholders and management approaches. No evidence of evaluation of papers. Little or no evidence of having read the cited Papers. 15% Structure and development of arguments about sustainable tourism development The paper is expertly organized and demonstrates strong evidence of synthesis across all sources; contains numerous clear, insightful connections between research articles’ findings. The paper is well organized and demonstrates strong evidence of synthesis across all sources; contains numerous clear, insightful connections between research articles’ findings. There is a clear organization to the paper, but may not always be logical or flowing Evidence of organization of the argument, but only adequately structured. Little attempts to show connections between the sources analyzed Poorly structured argument, no development. Little or no evidence of organization, no logical development 10% Credibility of Sources All the sources academically credible All the sources are directly related to the issue being reviewed. Most sources are from credible, scholarly materials Explain why the sources were chosen; Some sources are from credible, scholarly materials. Fairly explains why the sources were chosen; demonstrates some understanding of research process Few sources are from credible, scholarly materials Mostly lacking in explaining why the sources were chosen; Sources lack credibility. Does not explain why the sources were chosen; 10% Citations/ Conventions & mechanics Virtually free from mechanical, grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors; All of the assignment requirements were met. The citations are structured correctly according to APA style Occasional minor errors do not distract the reader; the majority of assignment requirements were met. Most of the citations are structured correctly according to APA style and sources of information are acknowledged. Some significant errors are present, but the overall meaning is clear; about half of the assignment requirements were met. The citations are adequately structured in accordance with APA style. There are a few omissions in acknowledgement of sources Errors are distracting, but the meaning is still clear; only some of the assignment requirements were met. Some of the citations are not structured correctly according to APA style. Errors distract the reader, to the extent the meaning is unclear; the assignment requirements were not met. Most of the citations are structured incorrectly and don’t in accordance with APA style. 10% Total Marks- 100------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Structure of the extended literature review Abstract This paper reviews literature in the area relating to ……. and ...The rationale for this analysis is to examine/ evaluate/investiage/…. And to assess for exampe the copitive and negative impcts of …. In order to achoive these objectives, research papers were searched for manually through journals and electronically via research engines such as . …. The articles of interset ranged from old seminal publications and the more recent publications on the the theme or subject of ….. All the artciles were examined using a standardized critiquing method. The analyses show that differrent authors consider sustainable tourism development as a difficult concept to achieve but neverthelesss achievable and therefore worh implementing. Introduction: conceptual thrust Introduce the concept/ main theme/subject of discussion and educate the reader about important themes related to the topic without necessarily focusing on one theme. What is sustainable tourism, origins of sustainable tourism, why the need for sustainable tourism, dimension of sustainable tourism development, implementing sustainable tourism development, sustainable tourism planning approaches, etc. Research strategy The research strategy: searching for papers both manually and electronically. How did you conduct the manual or electronic search of papers: looki ng through journals that have something to do with sustainable torism, reposnsible tourism, alteranative tourism Identify by name the notable journals or books that you searched: e.g. Journal of sustaiable tourism, Cases in Sustainable Tourism The electronic search took place on databases,: give examples of those databases eg, which Science Direct, Open athens, google scholar, ( state that these data bases store full papars on the subject your are reviewing). Literature review 1. Hall (1993) examined the …… {introduce the author of the article, (title of the article can be included or left out) and in your own words explain what the purpose of the article is} 2.Examine the Abstract: How informative is it. Does the abstract describe clearly the purpose of the study, how the study was carried out and results obtained from the study? 3. Introduction: 3. Examine the introduction: Does it provide adequate background information along with acknowledgement of others work in the field of sustaianble tourism. Does the introduction provide clear justifications for the research. Does it exaplin clealry the aims for the research. 4. Methodology Section. Are the methods used in