EXAMPLE 21.2 Righting behavior of aphids Pea aphids (Acyrthosiphon pisum) are small, wingless, sap-sucking insects that live on plants. They evade predators (such as ladybugs) by dropping off. A study...


21.6  Heat resistance in rice, continued. Excercise 21.2 investigated a genetic model oh heat resistance in rice plants. Software gives a P-value of 0.397. Interpret this result. Can you conclude that the distribution of heat-resistant phenotypes in F2 follows a dominant-recessive model (75%~ 25%)?


EXAMPLE 21.2<br>Righting behavior of aphids<br>Pea aphids (Acyrthosiphon pisum) are small, wingless, sap-sucking insects that live<br>on plants. They evade predators (such as ladybugs) by dropping off. A study exam-<br>ined the mechanism of aphid drops. Researchers hung live aphids upside down<br>from delicate tweezers and then released them. The videotaped drops showed that<br>19 of the 20 aphids landed on their legs.? Is this evidence that live aphids land<br>right side up (on their legs) more often than chance alone would predict?<br>

Extracted text: EXAMPLE 21.2 Righting behavior of aphids Pea aphids (Acyrthosiphon pisum) are small, wingless, sap-sucking insects that live on plants. They evade predators (such as ladybugs) by dropping off. A study exam- ined the mechanism of aphid drops. Researchers hung live aphids upside down from delicate tweezers and then released them. The videotaped drops showed that 19 of the 20 aphids landed on their legs.? Is this evidence that live aphids land right side up (on their legs) more often than chance alone would predict?
side. Therefore, the relevant null hypothesis is<br>Te this scenario, aphids can land either on their legs or on their back. If chance<br>vas at work, we would expect aphids to be equally likely to land on either<br>1<br>and Pback =<br>1<br>Ho: Plegs =<br>The alternative hypothesis is simply that Ho is not true.<br>The goodness-of-fit test can assess a variety of null hypotheses that reflect<br>how we expect one categorical variable to be distributed in the target popula-<br>tion. Because the variable is categorical, the parameters in Ho are population<br>proportions for the k possible outcomes (levels) making up the variable. The only<br>constraint on the null hypothesis for a goodness-of-fit test is that these k propor-<br>tions sum to 1, so that Ho accounts for all possible outcomes. In Example 21.1<br>the variable seed color had three possible outcomes (black, brown, pale) and the<br>three population proportions in Ho were 12/16, 3/16, and 1/16, which sum to 1.<br>In Example 21.2 the variable landing side had only two possible outcomes (legs,<br>back) and the two population proportions in Ho were 1/2 and 1/2.<br>

Extracted text: side. Therefore, the relevant null hypothesis is Te this scenario, aphids can land either on their legs or on their back. If chance vas at work, we would expect aphids to be equally likely to land on either 1 and Pback = 1 Ho: Plegs = The alternative hypothesis is simply that Ho is not true. The goodness-of-fit test can assess a variety of null hypotheses that reflect how we expect one categorical variable to be distributed in the target popula- tion. Because the variable is categorical, the parameters in Ho are population proportions for the k possible outcomes (levels) making up the variable. The only constraint on the null hypothesis for a goodness-of-fit test is that these k propor- tions sum to 1, so that Ho accounts for all possible outcomes. In Example 21.1 the variable seed color had three possible outcomes (black, brown, pale) and the three population proportions in Ho were 12/16, 3/16, and 1/16, which sum to 1. In Example 21.2 the variable landing side had only two possible outcomes (legs, back) and the two population proportions in Ho were 1/2 and 1/2.
Jun 02, 2022
SOLUTION.PDF

Get Answer To This Question

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here