Essay Question
According to the Public Relations Institute of Australia (2016), public relations professionals are required to have knowledge of communication theories, communication practice and, ethical practice and social responsibility. In addition, persuasive writing is a core skill expected of those employed in public relations. As such, it is important to understand Persuasion Theory and the ethical implications surrounding the use of persuasion in the design of public relations campaigns and programs.
Critically analyse the use of persuasion in public relations outlining ethical implications.
Please note, your essay must,
a) demonstrate your understanding of the use of persuasion in public relations,
b)outline the ethical implications,
c) discuss current guidelines (such as codes of conduct) that ensure public relations professionals act ethically and socially responsible*,
d) determine if current codes provide enough guidance,
e) suggest recommendations or modifications to the codes you examine and,
f) include a minimum of4 academicjournal articles
* you can also use real examplesto illustrate your point.
|
Please note:This is an individual assignment.
Reference: Public Relations Institute of Australia 2016,Professional Framework, retrieved 12 February 2019,http://www.pria.com.au/public/38/files/Education/Prof%20Framework/professional%20framework.pdf
This task addresses the following Unit Learning Outcomes:
ULO1:This task will provide you with the opportunity to read more widely about the theories utilised in public relations practice.
ULO5: Critically evaluate the use of persuasive communication, its value in public relations, and the ethical implications.
Resources to assist:
Topic guides, class notes and additional materials provided via the ALR731 CloudDeakin site provide guidance towards relevant readings.
FAQsrelated to this assessmentmay also assist.
Read broadly to demonstrate independent learning and to illustrate/support your discussion.
You are required to appropriately source and reference material used in the writing of your essay according to academic standards.
Referencing style = Harvard:http://www.deakin.edu.au/students/studying/study-support/referencing/harvard
Formatting:
- Essay format
- size 12 font
- 1.5 spacing
- ‘Normal’ margins settings (2.54cm)
- Page numbers, student name and ID in footer
- Submit as a Word Document or PDF
- Grammar, Spell and Word count check
- Harvard-style referencing
Please note: The Reference List isnotincluded in the word count. In-text referencesareincluded in the word count.
Marking Criteria:
The following criteria and weightings will be applied to work thatrelates to the assignment question:
Criteria
|
Weighting (%)
|
Theoretical understanding
|
Knowledge and understanding of the topic should be clearly articulated.
Demonstrated a satisfactory understanding/comprehension of the task.
A clear discussion is presented and supported with relevant information and literature.
Acritical evaluation of persuasive communication, its value in PR, and the ethical implications has been clearly articulated.
|
40
|
Background research
|
Demonstrated a satisfactory inclusion ofacademicresources to support a clear discussion regardingthe task.
- Includes a minimum of 4 academic references.
Demonstratedsatisfactory use of a range ofsupportingmaterial to illustrate and support the discussion which may include:
- codes of conduct
- industry reports
- organisationalweb sites
- real campaigns or cases
|
35
|
Referencing, Clarity, Grammar and Structure
|
Thewritten submission is logical, consistent and follows the format described in the assignment instructions.
- Complete and accurate referencing.
- Demonstrates the use of word processing software that meets formatting prescribed in the assignment instructions.
- Accurate spelling, grammar and punctuation.
- Writing demonstrates knowledge and understanding with a clear structure enhanced by sound written expression.
- Remained within the word count (+/- 10%).
|
25
|