Engine SizeHwy Fuel Efficiency 2.6029.45 1.5027.10 1.6030.63 3.3036.52 2.6045.95 3.2042.41 3.0035.35 2.0036.52 2.2034.17 1.6031.81 1.8032.99 1.7035.35 2.4032.99 2.6031.81 3.4024.74...

Engine SizeHwy Fuel Efficiency
2.6029.45
1.5027.10
1.6030.63
3.3036.52
2.6045.95
3.2042.41
3.0035.35
2.0036.52
2.2034.17
1.6031.81
1.8032.99
1.7035.35
2.4032.99
2.6031.81
3.4024.74
1.9024.74
2.2027.10
3.1025.92
1.7029.45
2.8031.81
2.2043.59
2.7047.13
2.1041.24
3.1035.35
3.4030.63
2.4029.45
3.4037.70
2.3025.92
3.2029.45
3.1024.74
2.0040.06
3.0044.77
3.4035.35
2.1032.99
2.5038.88
3.0034.17
3.1032.99
2.5031.81
2.9027.10
1.5027.10
1.5037.70
1.4034.17
2.6028.28
3.3027.10
2.3040.06
3.2042.41
2.2034.17
2.8031.81
1.7041.24
3.3038.88
3.3035.35
3.4037.70
3.3028.28
1.9028.28
3.2041.24
1.8027.10
3.3036.52
2.4036.52
3.3034.17
2.4032.99
1.9034.17
1.4040.06
3.1025.92
2.2036.52
1.8028.28
3.3041.24
2.4045.95
2.5031.81
2.3037.70
2.4038.88

Extracted text: What is the shape of the highway fuel efficiency distribution? Why? (NOTE 1: Skewed right must select>, skewed left must select<, etc.)="" note="" 2:="" the="" shape="" of="" the="" distribution="" is="" based="" on="" the="" formatted="" 4-decimal="" numbers="" showing="" in="" your="" output.)="" question="" 6="" because="" question="" 7="" rule="" predicts="" that="" lpercent="" of="" the="" engine="" size="" data="" should="" lie="" between="" 1.2774="" and="" 3.7797="" liters,="" which="" aret/.="" standard="" deviation(s)="" away="" from="" the="" mean="" question="" 8="" what="" varied="" the="" most="" in="" this="" study,="" engine="" size="" or="" highway="" fuel="" efficiency?="" prove="" using="" the="" best="" measure="" of="" variability!="" varied="" the="" most.="" proof:="" engine="" size="" hwy="" fuel="">