Ellis says that the “case for the multiverse is inconclusive” because on principle science does not have, and can never have, any way of observing anything outside our universe. Suppose Ellis is...

Ellis says that the “case for the multiverse is inconclusive” because on principle science does not have, and can never have, any way of observing anything outside our universe. Suppose Ellis is right. Do you think that since the multiverse theory can never be proved or disproved by science, it is “unscientific”? Suppose Ellis is right and those who propose the multiverse theory can never prove it. Does that mean the theory is not a valid objection to the claim that the improbability of the universe requires an intelligent creator? Why?