ELEMENT 1 Part 3 Your task is to produce iteration 2. You will need to produce a revised project plan that demonstrates the feedback from your evaluation of iteration 1. You need to demonstrate how you have managed risk and how you have overcome technical and team problems. Part 3 Deliverables: Documentation of sprint review, a revised project plan, update data model, BDD specifications for prototype 2, prototype 2 The review should be a summary of the retrospective session that you had at SEGA and a usability testing. The revised project plan should show how you have adjusted your plan after the sprint 1. BDD specification should demonstrate testing by examples. The supporting report and another user stories etc you have it all in this order that's why I have asked for extra work in the same order as the team as before work on this order and everything is linked. I have also uploaded the whole assignment BUT the team only needs to do ELEMENT 1 PART 3 also for your information in the assignment guide, the case it's based on is number 2 social media. Another task is ELMENT 2 OF THE ASSISGMENT THE ALL ELEMENT. The report should have 2 sections one section should include : An introduction to agile discussing the objectives of the development and the merits using SCRUM A report of your role: what happened to the user story you were responsible for and the effectiveness of your interaction with the customer A justification of the development project plan and the choice of technology and a reflective review of its effectiveness A review of the effectiveness of the development approach and techniques used A review of your role as a developer and the effectiveness of the integration of your code with the rest of the group. A review of the effectiveness of the team roles and how you dealt with difficulties experienced. Analysis of the results of the user evaluation and a list of recommended specific further approaches to redesign. In particular how the feedback from sprint 1 was built into sprint 2. Summary of the findings. Summary of the overall plan with a review of what was achieved A list of references. Appendices giving evidence of your contribution to the development (the features you were responsible for) The other section should have Reflective Summary of your experience INCLUDING A REFLECTIVE DIARY as a member of a community of practice and what this means for effective groups in the ICT industries. This should answer the questions – · What was my contribution to the group activity? · How was the interaction with the customers? · How could the group have performed better?
Already registered? Login
Not Account? Sign up
Enter your email address to reset your password
Back to Login? Click here