Economists claim that “in-kind” redistributive programs, whereby the recipient receives goods and services, such as food stamps or housing, are less efficient than providing the recipient with just...

Economists claim that “in-kind” redistributive programs, whereby the recipient receives goods and services, such as food stamps or housing, are less efficient than providing the recipient with just cash, which enables them to purchase those goods and services they need most. Why is it unlikely, therefore, that cash will be used instead of in-kind services?