Case Study 1 – Due 9/22 Scenario 1 David L. Miller: Portrait of a White-Collar Criminal There is an old saying: Crime doesn’t pay. However, for David Miller crime paid for two Mercedes-Benz sedans; a...

1 answer below »
each question should have 100 words.


Case Study 1 – Due 9/22 Scenario 1 David L. Miller: Portrait of a White-Collar Criminal There is an old saying: Crime doesn’t pay. However, for David Miller crime paid for two Mercedes-Benz sedans; a lavish suburban home; a condominium at Myrtle Beach; expensive suits; tailored and monogrammed shirts; diamond, sapphire, ruby, and emerald rings for his wife; and a new car for his father-in-law. Though Miller confessed to embezzling funds from six different employers over a 20-year period, he has never been prosecuted or incarcerated—in large part because his employers never turned him in. Miller was fired from his first employer for stealing $200. After an assortment of odd jobs, he worked as an accountant for a local baker. Miller was caught embezzling funds and paid back the $1,000 he stole. Again, law enforcement was not notified, and he was quietly dismissed. Several months after Miller started work at Wheeling Bronze, his third victim, the president discovered a $30,000 cash shortfall and several missing returned checks. An extensive search found the canceled checks, with forged signatures, in an outdoor sand pile. Miller confessed to the scheme and was given the choice of repaying the stolen funds or being prosecuted. When Miller’s parents mortgaged their home and repaid the stolen money, he escaped prosecution. Miller’s fourth victim was Robinson Pipe Cleaning. When Miller was caught embezzling funds, he again avoided prosecution by promising to repay the $20,000 he stole. Miller’s fifth victim was Crest Industries, where he worked as accountant. He was an ideal employee—dedicated and hard working, doing outstanding work. He was quickly promoted to office manager and soon purchased a new home, car, and wardrobe. Two years later, Crest auditors discovered that $31,000 was missing. Miller had written several checks to himself, recorded them as payments to suppliers, and intercepted and altered the monthly bank statements. With the stolen money, he financed his lifestyle and repaid Wheeling Bronze and Robinson Pipe Cleaning. Once again, Miller tearfully confessed, claiming he had never embezzled funds previously. Miller showed so much remorse that Crest hired a lawyer for him. He promised to repay the stolen money, gave Crest a lien on his house, and was quietly dismissed. Because Crest management did not want to harm Miller’s wife and three children, Crest never pressed charges. Miller’s sixth victim was Rustcraft Broadcasting Company. When Rustcraft was acquired by Associated Communications, Miller moved to Pittsburgh to become Associated’s new controller. Miller immediately began dipping into Associated’s accounts. Over a six-year period, Miller embezzled $1.36 million, $450,000 of that after he was promoted to CFO. Miller circumvented the need for two signatures on checks by asking executives leaving on vacation to sign several checks “just in case” the company needed to disburse funds while he was gone. Miller used the checks to siphon funds to his personal account. To cover the theft, Miller removed the canceled check from the bank reconciliation and destroyed it. The stolen amount was charged to a unit’s expense account to balance the company’s books. While working at Associated, Miller bought a new house, new cars, a vacation home, and an extravagant wardrobe. He was generous with tips and gifts. His $130,000 salary could not have supported this lifestyle, yet no one at Associated questioned the source of his conspicuous consumption. Miller’s lifestyle came crashing down while he was on vacation and the bank called to inquire about a check written to Miller. Miller confessed and, as part of his out-of-court settlement, Associated received most of Miller’s personal property. Miller cannot explain why he was never prosecuted. His insistence that he was going to pay his victims back usually satisfied his employers and got him off the hook. He believes these agreements actually contributed to his subsequent thefts; one rationalization for stealing from a new employer was to pay back the former one. Miller believes his theft problem is an illness, like alcoholism or compulsive gambling, that is driven by a subconscious need to be admired and liked by others. He thought that by spending money, others would like him. Ironically, he was universally well liked and admired at each job, for reasons that had nothing to do with money. In fact, one Associated coworker was so surprised by the thefts that he said it was like finding out that your brother was an ax murderer. Miller claims he is not a bad person; he never intended to hurt anyone, but once he got started, he could not stop. After leaving Associated, Miller was hired by a former colleague, underwent therapy, and now believes he has resolved his problem with compulsive embezzlement. (Explain your answers in detail. Your answer to each question should be at least 100 words.) 1. Explain the three elements of the Opportunity Triangle (commit, conceal, convert), and discuss how Miller accomplished each when embezzling funds from Associated Communications. What specific concealment techniques did Miller use? 2. What pressures motivated Miller to embezzle? How did Miller rationalize his actions? 3. Why do companies hesitate to prosecute white-collar criminals? What are the consequences of not prosecuting? How could law enforcement officials encourage more prosecution? 4. What could the victimized companies have done to prevent Miller’s embezzlement? Source: Based on Bryan Burrough, “David L. Miller Stole from His Employer and Isn’t in Prison,” The Wall Street Journal, September 19, 1986, 1. Scenario 2 Heirloom Photo Plans Heirloom Photos sells a $900 photography plan to rural customers using a commissioned sales force. Rather than pay the price up front, most customers pay $250 down and make 36 monthly payments of $25 each. The $900 plan includes the following: A coupon book good for one free sitting every six months for the next five years (10 sittings) at any Heirloom-approved photo studio. The customer receives one free 11-by-14-inch black-and-white print. Additional photos or color upgrades can be purchased at the photographer’s retail prices. To preserve the 11-by-14-inch photos, the family name is embossed in 24-carat gold on a leather-bound photo album. The embossed leather album, with a retail value of $300, costs Heirloom $75. Each sitting and free 11-by-14-inch print, with a retail value of $150, costs Heirloom only $50 because photographers are given exclusive rights to all Heirloom customers in a geographic region and have the opportunity to offer customers upgrades to color and/or more pictures. The commissioned sales staff is paid on the 10th of each month, based upon the prior month’s sales. The commission rates are as follows: Over 70% of all agents sell at least 101 plans per year; 40% sell over 200. There is a strong sales surge before year-end as customers purchase plans to give as holiday gifts. About 67% of all agents reach their highest incentive level in late November or December. Heirloom treats the sales staff and the photographers as independent contractors and does not withhold any income or payroll taxes on amounts paid to them. Salespeople send Heirloom’s accounting department the order form, the total payment or the down payment, and the signed note for $650 if the customer finances the transaction. Often, the payment is a hand-written money order. Because many customers live in rural areas, the return address is often a Post Office box, and some customers do not have phones. Heirloom does not perform any credit checks of customers. Heirloom makes the following entries at the time a new contract is recorded: Because the entire cost of the photographer is accrued, the company points to the last entry to show how conservative its accounting is. After waiting 10 days for the check or money order to clear, Heirloom embosses and ships the album, the photo coupon book, and a payment coupon book with 36 payments of $25. Customers mail a payment coupon and a check or money order to a three-person Receivables Department at headquarters. The Receivables employees open the envelopes, post the payments to the receivables records, and prepare the bank deposit. The photo coupon book has 10 coupons for photographer sessions, each good for a specific six-month period. If not used within the six-month period, the coupon expires. Each month, the credit manager sends letters and makes phone calls to collect on delinquent accounts. Between 35% and 40% of all customers eventually stop paying on their notes, usually either early in the contract (months 4 to 8) or at the two-year point (months 22 to 26). Notes are written off when they are 180 days delinquent. Heirloom’s CFO and credit manager use their judgment to adjust the Allowance for Bad Debts monthly. They are confident they can accurately predict the Allowance balance needed at any time, which historically has been about 5% of outstanding receivables. Agricultural product prices in the area where Heirloom sells its plans have been severely depressed for the second straight year. Heirloom has been growing quickly and finds that it is continually running short of cash, partly because of the large salaries paid to the two equal owners and their wives. (The wives each receive $100,000 to serve as the treasurer and the secretary; very little, if any, time is required in these duties.) In addition, Heirloom spent large amounts of cash to buy its headquarters, equipment and furnishings, and expensive automobiles for the two owners, their wives, and the four vice presidents. Heirloom needs to borrow from a local bank for corporate short-term operating purposes. It is willing to pledge unpaid contracts as collateral for a loan. A local bank president is willing to lend Heirloom up to 70% of the value of notes receivable that are not more than 60 days overdue. Heirloom must also provide, by the fifth day of each month, a note receivable aging list for the preceding month and a calculation showing the maximum amount Heirloom may borrow under the agreement. (Explain your answers in detail. Your answer to each question should be at least 100 words.) 1. Figure 5-3 shows the employees and external parties that deal with Heirloom. Explain how Heirloom could defraud the bank and how each internal and external party, except the bank, could defraud Heirloom. 2. What risk factor, unusual item, or abnormality would alert you to each fraud? 3. What control weaknesses make each fraud possible? 4. Recommend one or more controls to prevent or detect each means of committing fraud. Figure 5-3: Internal and External Relationships at Heirloom Photos Page 1 of 6
Answered Same DayAug 28, 2021

Answer To: Case Study 1 – Due 9/22 Scenario 1 David L. Miller: Portrait of a White-Collar Criminal There is an...

Priyanka answered on Sep 03 2021
142 Votes
CASE STUDY ANSWERS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SCENARIO 1    1
SCENARIO 2    3
REFERENCES    5
SCENARIO 1:
1. Explain the three elements of the Opportunity Triangle (commit, conceal, convert), and discuss how Miller accomplished each when
embezzling funds from Associated Communications. What specific concealment techniques did Miller use?
· The offender can commit the fraud either by robbing the cash or other means which has value or by giving false and improper information. Miller has robbed cash by disabling the signatures required in the checks. He trickily made the concerned representatives to sign the checks before they go on a long tour by making them believe that it may be required for some immediate purposes
· The offender can conceal the fraud to avoid being caught. To dos so, he must be able to manhandle and misrepresent financial information by increasing the assets an adjusting the liabilities accordingly. Miller directly went to the bank and collected the check and shattered it. To balance the amount robbed, Miller had just shown it as an increased expense in one of the accounts and forged the financial statements.
· The offender must be able to convert the robbed cash or asset into a useful property. It may indirectly affect the financial statements as the conversion is unstable. Miller had collected cash from the bank by changing the check, deposited the check on his personal account which is a clear case of forgery.
2. What pressures motivated Miller to embezzle? How did Miller rationalize his actions?
David Miller had undergone therapy to resolve his problem of embezzlement. He trusts that his problem was an illness just like gambling or alcoholism. He always had a thought that he wanted to be liked by others and thus did this robbery. He thought spending more money would make others like him more. Generally, Miller was a liked and admired person at his workplace and otherwise. Those who heard about were more shocked and embarrassed about this fraud. Miller has also told that he did not commit any bad actions and did not want to hurt sentiments of any.
1
The fraud money might have been used to pay back his previous employers and any rationalizations are not mentioned in the case study as well.
3. Why...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here