dq 1The DNA of Disruptive Leaders and OrganizationsIntuitive Surgical, which Dyer, Gregersen, and Christensen (2011) recognize as a highly innovative company, finds itself in a difficult competitive situation. While it produces many of the best robotic surgical devices and controls much of the market, its patents will soon expire, and new competitors are challenging its leadership. How should leaders at Intuitive Surgical apply the five discovery skills of disruptive innovators and the DNA of disruptive organizations (people, processes, and philosophies) to retain their leadership and/or establish leadership in new market segments? While Intuitive Surgical has demonstrated a high innovation premium in the past, can it leverage the DNA of innovation leaders and organizations to remain competitive? For this discussion, select two of the five skills to address.Response GuidelinesPost a substantive reply to at least two other learners. For this response, reply to posts that analyzed different skills from the ones you addressed. Your replies should demonstrate clear links between the discussion topic, readings, and the content in the posts.ReferenceDyer, J., Gregersen, H., & Christensen, C. M. (2011). The innovator’s DNA: Mastering the five skills of disruptive innovators. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Publishing.dq 2Conducting an Initial AnalysisThe final assignment asks you to conduct an analysis of either Procter & Gamble or Intuitive Surgical. After reviewing both cases and the expectations for the final assignment, make a preliminary determination as to which company you plan to use for your final project. You are not required to stay with this selection for the final assignment.For this discussion, conduct an initial analysis of your chosen company by answering the following:What is your initial impression of which leadership practice or practices would be appropriate and why?How well does the company you have chosen exemplify application of the five discovery skills of innovation leaders?How well did the leaders guide the company toward the right people, processes, and philosophies; and which is most important in this situation?Response GuidelinesPost a substantive reply to at least two other learners. As you review your colleagues’ posts, focus on others who chose the same company you chose. Examine points of agreement and differences in your analyses, but pay particular attention to the differences. In your reply posts, explore what you learned from these different perspectives and how they enhanced your understanding of the situation. If you disagree with another learner, engage in respectful and professional dialogue.