powerpoint presentation
Disabling Societies: The Sociologies of Ageing and Disability Continuous Assessment 1.2: POWERPOINT PRESENTATION Critical Analysis: Media Portrayals of Ageing: 1500 words (equivalent) · Clearly presents and describes one media portrayal of ageing and provides evidence of similar portrayals · Critically analyses sociological implications of ways that older people are constructed and represented in the media · Examine the relationship between society and its institutions, disability and ageing · Evaluate how diverse categories of identity including gender and sexuality, `race' and ethnicity, socio-economic status and age intersect in the representation, imagining and experience of disability and ageing · Provide clear evidence of extensive reading and research demonstrated in the PowerPoint presentation. Arguments are supported by sociological literature · Employs appropriate referencing conventions to cite the literature used in the reference list (and in the presentation where applicable) Disabling Societies: The Sociologies of Ageing and Disability Course learning outcomes: CO2. Examine the relationship between society and its institutions, disability and ageing CO4. Evaluate how diverse categories of identity including gender and sexuality, `race' and ethnicity, socio-economic status and age intersect in the representation, imagining and experience of disability and ageing Continuous Assessment 1.2: Critical Analysis: Media Portrayals of Ageing: 1500 words (equivalent): 35% Criteria Outstanding performance Exceeds core requirements Meets core requirements Fails to meet core requirements Clearly presents and describes one media portrayal of ageing and provides evidence of similar portrayals 20% Clearly and insightfully presents and describes one media portrayal of ageing and provides compelling evidence of similar portrayals. Clearly presents and describes one media portrayal of ageing and provides evidence of similar portrayals. Attempts to present and describe one media portrayal of ageing and provides some evidence of similar portrayals. Does not clearly present and describe one media portrayal of ageing. Does not provide evidence of similar portrayals. Critically analyses sociological implications of ways that older people are constructed and represented in the media 40% Critically, logically and insightfully analyses sociological implications of ways that older people are constructed and represented in the media. Critically analyses sociological implications of ways that older people are constructed and represented in the media. To an extent, critically analyses sociological implications of ways that older people are constructed and represented in the media. Does not critically analyse sociological implications of ways that older people are constructed and represented in the media. Provides clear evidence of extensive reading and research demonstrated in the PowerPoint presentation. Arguments are supported by sociological literature 15% Provides clear and consistent evidence of extensive reading and research demonstrated in the PowerPoint presentation. Arguments are cohesive and insightfully supported by sociological literature. Provides clear evidence of extensive reading and research demonstrated in the PowerPoint presentation. Arguments are cohesive and are mostly supported by sociological literature. Provides some evidence of extensive reading and research demonstrated in the PowerPoint presentation. Attempts to formulate cohesive arguments supported by sociological literature but may lack consistency. Does not provide clear evidence of extensive reading and research demonstrated in the PowerPoint presentation. Arguments are not supported by sociological literature. Presentation is engaging, well- paced, clear, comprehensive and keeps within the allocated time limit 15% Presentation is highly engaging, well-paced, clear, comprehensive and keeps within the allocated time limit. Presentation is professional quality. Presentation is engaging, well- paced, clear, comprehensive and keeps within the allocated time limit. Presentation is mostly of a professional quality. Presentation is mostly engaging, well-paced, clear, and comprehensive, but may lack consistency with these elements at times. Attempts to keep within the allocated time limit Presentation is not engaging, well- paced, clear, or comprehensive. Does not keep within the allocated time limit. Employs appropriate referencing conventions to cite the literature used in the reference list (and in Consistently employs appropriate referencing conventions to cite the literature used in the reference list Employs appropriate referencing conventions to cite the literature used in the reference list (and in the presentation where Mostly employs appropriate referencing conventions to cite the literature used in the reference list Does not employ appropriate referencing conventions to cite the literature used in the reference list (and in the presentation where the presentation where applicable) 10% (and in the presentation where applicable). No errors. applicable). Some minor errors or inconsistencies. (and in the presentation where applicable). Some errors. applicable). Significant and systematic errors in referencing. Comments