1 Unsatisfactory 0.00%
|
2 Less than Satisfactory 65.00%
|
3 Satisfactory 75.00%
|
4 Good 85.00%
|
5 Excellent 100.00%
|
---|
80.0 % Content
|
|
80.0 % Compare and Contrast Family Cultures
|
Assignment does not demonstrate an understanding of the differences between family cultures. Interview template is not present, and the interview summary does not address the required questions. |
Assignment demonstrates only a minimal understanding of differences and similarities between family cultures. Assignment includes only a minimal summary of interview, and an overall understanding of cultural differences is not demonstrated. |
Assignment demonstrates knowledge of different family cultures and structures. Interview questions are lacking in content, and fewer than 10 questions are present. Assignment shows an understanding of differences between cultures, but examples from interviews are not fully explained. |
Assignment describes most of the main concepts regarding family cultures. Examples are present, and a basic understanding is demonstrated. Interview questions are detailed, but an additional three questions are not developed as required. |
Assignment clearly describes all the main concepts surrounding family cultures. A full summary of the interview is given, with a minimum of 10 questions. Assignment clearly describes the differences and similarities between the cultures, as well as the roles the cultures share. Strong evidence of critical thinking is demonstrated. |
17.0 % Organization and Effectiveness
|
|
6.0 % Thesis Development and Purpose
|
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. |
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. |
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. |
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. |
Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. |
17.0 % Organization and Effectiveness
|
|
6.0 % Paragraph Development and Transitions
|
Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. Organization is disjointed. |
Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident. |
Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other. |
A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose. |
There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless. |
17.0 % Organization and Effectiveness
|
|
5.0 %
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
|
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. |
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. |
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. |
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. |
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
3.0 % Format
|
|
1.0 % Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
|
Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. |
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. |
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. |
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. |
All format elements are correct. |
2.0 % Research Citations (in-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment)
|
No reference page is included. No citations are used. |
Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. |
Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present |
Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. |
In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. |
100 % Total Weightage
|
|