· Demonstration of knowledge of the issues and evidence of wide reading to support your analysis · Demonstration of your ability to apply the knowledge to identify keys issues leading to your...

1 answer below »
· Demonstration of knowledge of the issues and evidence of wide reading to support your analysis
· Demonstration of your ability to apply the knowledge to identify keys issues leading to your recommendations
· Evidence of sound reasoning and the exercise of professional judgement to support your recommendations
· Development and statement of concise recommendations for presentation to the AICD
· Overall structure and professional presentation of the report to the AICD
· High quality written communication of concepts and terms in ordinary English as not all readers of the report can be assumed to be specialists competent in corporate governance

Case Study


‘As a separate legal person, a corporation has two basic objectives: To survive and to thrive. Shareholder value is not the objective of the corporation; it is an outcome of the corporation’s activities. While shareholders entrust the


Document Preview:

Length: 2,000 words total (+/- 10%). Reference list and cover sheet details are not included in this word-limit total. Weighting: 25% of total unit marks Assessment Criteria: ? Demonstration of knowledge of the issues and evidence of wide reading to support your analysis ? Demonstration of your ability to apply the knowledge to identify keys issues leading to your recommendations ? Evidence of sound reasoning and the exercise of professional judgement to support your recommendations ? Development and statement of concise recommendations for presentation to the AICD ? Overall structure and professional presentation of the report to the AICD ? High quality written communication of concepts and terms in ordinary English as not all readers of the report can be assumed to be specialists competent in corporate governance Case Study ‘As a separate legal person, a corporation has two basic objectives: To survive and to thrive. Shareholder value is not the objective of the corporation; it is an outcome of the corporation’s activities. While shareholders entrust their stakes in a corporation to the board of directors, shareholders are just one audience among others that the board may consider when making decisions on behalf of the corporation. These audiences, typically called stakeholders, may also include other financial stakeholders, such as bondholders, and nonfinancial stakeholders, such as employees, customers, suppliers, and NGOs representing various concerns of civil society. In the face of limited resources, no matter how large the corporation, directors must make choices regarding the significance of the corporation’s many audiences.’ Source: Robert G Eccles and Tim Youmans (2015) ‘Why Boards Must Look Beyond Shareholders’, MIT Sloan Management Review  HYPERLINK "http://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/why-boards-must-look-beyond-shareholders/" http://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/why-boards-must-look-beyond-shareholders/ Required Assume you have been...



Answered Same DayDec 26, 2021

Answer To: · Demonstration of knowledge of the issues and evidence of wide reading to support your analysis ·...

David answered on Dec 26 2021
121 Votes
Contents
1. Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................. 2
2. Analysis............................................................................................................................................. 3
3. Case of American Pharma Company ....................................................................
................................ 6
4. Conclusion: ........................................................................................................................................... 7
Reference list: ............................................................................................................................................... 8
1. Executive Summary
Shareholder theory Vs stakeholder theory has been the area of research and discussion among the
corporates and researchers. There are numerous theories available on the subject. There are 2
school of thoughts that clearly advocates their theory and always try to prove that one of the
theory is better than another. However, there is no statistics available that can prove adoption of
which theory can yield better results. The important to remember here is that both these are
normative theories and advocated the different routes for achieving the same end i.e. financial
success for the firm. Both these theories focuses on creating value, value maximization to the
extent it is possible by honoring all possible laws and without fraud and misconduct. Thus, it
does not necessarily has to be zero sum game between the theories and executives can
accommodate the best of both the theories for the single common goal which is long term value
maximization. The recommendation to AICD is that both these theories can be used together
creatively so as to take the board decision which are responsive to diverse stakeholder
community and managers should focus more on long term value maximization and take decision
which are financially conducive for the organization by respecting the boundaries of law.
The purpose of this paper is to critically analyze both the theories and understand them in depth
and evaluate how the executives can use both these theories for the greater good so that they will
be more responsive to diverse audiences. The approach of this paper is quite neutral as it
discusses both these theories along with the examples and includes the viewpoints from disciples
of both these theories. Example of world leaders like Disney and GE will also be used to signify
the theory they are following.
2. Analysis
This is the age of competition and collaboration. In such challenging times, firms are also
rediscovering and redefining the purpose of their firm by moving to more collectivism approach
as compared to individualism. There are 2 well known competing theories called shareholder
theory and stakeholder theory and most of the organizations premises their objectives on 1 of
these theories. However, it would be absolutely wrong to say that any 1 of these theory is better
than the other. Both has their own pros and cons but it is very important for the management to
understand these theories in depth so that they can think creatively, take a middle path and take
decisions which includes the best of both the theories .
As per the shareholder theory, the sole purpose of the company’ directors and management is to
maximize the shareholders return as they are the actual investors in the business and they will be
ones who lose their wealth if the business is not doing well. However, as per the stakeholder
theory, managers have a responsibility towards greater audience called stakeholders which
includes customer, society, suppliers, and employees. Shareholders are just subset of
stakeholders.
As the corporate social responsibility is increasingly become more important for the
organizations, they are increasingly revising their objective to serve the greater purpose than just
to serve the purpose of the shareholders. As per the disciples of stakeholders theory, focus on
shareholder theory is the reason behind the...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here