dEADLINE 9/4/ 2012
TIME 10: 00 AM
This assignment is the continuation of the Unit 1 IP (Part 2) assignment and it has two parts for the Unit 2 IP assignment:
Part 1
For this assignment, use the same hypothesis and the Literature Review from your IP1 (Part 2) assignment and compose a 2-3 page theoretical framework (Step 4 of the Sekaran & Bougie process). Use the components of a theoretical framework described in the Sekaran & Bougie textbook as well as the examples contained in the textbook and in published research. Additionally, use sources available on the web, the library, and from the textbook to support your arguments. Remember to include these sources in the references section of your paper.
Part 2
Using figure 5-1 of Sekaran & Bougie as a guideline, write a 3-5 page Scientific Research Design (Step 6) appropriate for the hypothesis and the Literature Review from the IP1 and the theoretical framework you have prepared for Part 1 of this IP2. Include the type of investigation needed, the study setting, the unit of analysis, and your recommended time horizon for the study. Also offer your assessment on the extent of “researcher interference” (pp. 111-113) and any ethical considerations that may arise from the research design you are proposing.
Your assignment should consist of an abstract, a short introduction, and conclusion in addition to the body of the paper (Part 1 and Part 2). Using the Library, the Internet, and your course materials write a 5-6 page document using MS Word.
APA
add to assigment
Chapter 2 page Please read the following list of large companies: Boeing American Express China Petroleum & Chemical (Sinopec) Intel Home Depot China Construction Bank Microsoft Petrobras-Petro´leo Brasil AT&T Cre´dit Agricole Mizuho Financial Socie´te´ Ge´ne´rale Group Microsoft Petrobras-Petro´leo Brasil AT&T Cre´dit Agricole Mizuho Financial Socie´te´ Ge´ne´rale Group E.ON ENI AXA Group Verizon Communications HBOS IBM Procter & Gamble Barclays Banco Santander BNP Paribas Royal Bank of Scotland Wal-Mart Stores ExxonMobil Bank of America General Electric Without looking back at the list, please estimate whether there are: a. more companies on the list that are based in the United States, or b. more companies on the list that are based outside the United States. Ifyou guessed that there are more American ?rms on the list, you are in the majority. Most people (at least, most Americans polled) estimate that there are more American companies than foreign companies on the list. Most people also guess that the Ameri- can ?rms are larger than the foreign companies listed. However, this majority response is incorrect. In fact, there are thirteen American ?rms on the list and fourteen based outside ofthe United States. What’s more, the non- U.S. ?rms were ranked higher than the American ?rms on Fortune magazine’s 2006 list ofthe largest global corporations. Why do most people overestimate the frequency of American ?rms on the list? Because the American company names are more familiar, more recognizable, and more memorable to Americans than the foreign company names. This problem illustrates the availabilityheuristic, which we introduced in Chapter 1. For Americans, the names ofAmerican ?rms are more available in our memories than the names offoreign ?rms after reading the list. We err in assuming that the prevalence ofAmerican ?rms in our minds mirrors the real world. Awareness ofthe bias resulting from the availability heuristic should inspire us to question our...
Already registered? Login
Not Account? Sign up
Enter your email address to reset your password
Back to Login? Click here