Darwin objects to Paley’s argument, particularly Paley’s claim that the human eye has the marks of being designed by an intelligent being. Does Darwin’s objection interpret Paley’s argument as an...

Darwin objects to Paley’s argument, particularly Paley’s claim that the human eye has the marks of being designed by an intelligent being. Does Darwin’s objection interpret Paley’s argument as an argument by analogy or as an inference to the best explanation? In other words, is Darwin objecting to Paley’s analogy, or is he objecting to Paley’s explanation. Explain.