Criticize the journal articles entitled Ethical Dilemmas Experienced by Psychological Counsellors Working at Different Institutions and their Attitudes and Behaviours as a Response to These Dilemmas"...

Criticize the journal articles entitled Ethical Dilemmas Experienced by Psychological Counsellors Working at Different Institutions and their Attitudes and Behaviours as a Response to These Dilemmas" by Serpil KOLAY AKFERT

Questions:

1. Is the purpose of the article made clear in the introduction?


2. What type of research is this? Explain.


3. In your own words, what methods and procedures were used. Evaluate the methods and procedures. Are the study design and methods appropriate for the purposes of the study?


4. Evaluate the sampling method and sample used in this study?


5. Describe the reliability and validity of all the instruments used.


6. Have the procedures been presented in enough detail to enable a reader to duplicate them?


7. How was the data analyzed?


8. Is/are the major finding(s)? Are these findings important?


9. Do you find errors of fact and interpretation?


10. Does the article use evidence from reputable sources? Are there sufficient pieces of evidence to support the claim?


11. Should some sections of the manuscript be expanded, condensed or omitted? What are your suggestions to improve this research?


12. Is the research important? Why?