CRICOS Provider No. 00103D Page 1 of 5 ITECH1100 Understanding the Digital Revolution Assignment 1 - Paperback Basement Overview For this individual assignment, you will use skills acquired through...

1 answer below ยป
what is the cost?


CRICOS Provider No. 00103D Page 1 of 5 ITECH1100 Understanding the Digital Revolution Assignment 1 - Paperback Basement Overview For this individual assignment, you will use skills acquired through practical laboratory exercises to automate a business process, and to visualize the impact of the automation. You should use Microsoft Excel (or equivalent open-source software) for this assessment task. Important: This assignment specification is generated just for you. Do not distribute this specification. Timelines and Expectations Percentage value of task: 20% Due: Sunday, Week 7 (See Course Description for date) Learning Outcomes Assessed The following course learning outcomes are assessed by completing this assessment: A1. Prepare a basic solution to a business problem; A2. Select appropriate IT solutions for business functions; A3. Apply business information software for data visualization and analysis purposes. S1. Write basic programming logic; S3. Interpret and construct representations of business data flow and processes; K8. Outline the basic principles of programming. Assessment Details Paperback Basement is a small second-hand book shop, run by a team of three staff members: Andrea, Belle, and Celia. For this assignment, you will complete the following set of tasks using Excel, and build an ePortfolio page to describe your work. Task 0 - Setting up Create an ePortfolio page for your assignment. You will submit this page to Moodle as per the lab tasks. You may call it whatever you like, for example ITECH1100 Assignment 1 - 30353749. Hours of operation Most of the time, each team member works separate shifts: Andrea works 9:00 AM to 12:30 PM, Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday; Belle works 9:00 AM to 12:30 PM, Thursday, Friday and Saturday; and Celia works 12:30 PM to 5:30 PM, Monday to Friday. The shop runs from 9:00 AM to 5:30 PM each day, except Saturday when it closes at 12:30. It is closed entirely on Sundays. CRICOS Provider No. 00103D Page 2 of 5 Costs Andrea and Belle are the semi-retired co-owners of the bookshop, and do not take a salary. Celia, however, is a part-time employee, with total employment costs of $22 per hour. Celia is also entitled to four weeks of paid annual leave, during which a casual replacement is required at a cost of $33 per hour. Fixed costs such as rent and insurance are $2900 per year, and utilities costs are $140 per month. Task 1 - Costs of operating the business Using Excel, create a spreadsheet called operating_costs.xlsx that calculates the projected annual outgoing costs of running Paperback Basement. Your spreadsheet should be configured such that the working hours, hourly rates, and fixed and utility costs can be varied easily. Document your findings in your ePortfolio page (approximately 100 words). Obtaining Books Throughout the day, customers come to Paperback Basement to buy books, and occasionally to sell them. When people bring in books to sell to Paperback Basement, the staff member on duty will review the books and make an offer for each one individually. Currently, the process for determining how much the book shop will pay for a book is entirely subjective. Staff members offer an amount per book based on the quality of the book, and how popular they think it is, and how they are feeling at the time. The sale amount is always simply double the amount paid and is set at the same time - if Paperback Basement pays $3.00 for a book, they will put it on sale with a marked price of $6.00. (Paperback Basement does not deal in rare or antique books) For several months, staff have been keeping track of the date and time, quality, publication year and amount paid for each book in a spreadsheet. This spreadsheet is available for download on Moodle. Task 2 - Sales team offers Using Excel, process the history of purchases spreadsheet and use appropriate charts to visualize: How the prices paid differed for each staff member; and How the prices paid have changed over time Describe your findings in your ePortfolio (approximately 250 words), and attach the Excel file to your page. Process automation Andrea and Belle want to improve the consistency of how they pay for and price books. They'd like to standardize on three standard price offers, and have designed the following process to determine how to allocate them, including the option of rejecting the book altogether. CRICOS Provider No. 00103D Page 3 of 5 The staff have already agreed on how to determine whether a book is terrible, poor, or good. Bo ok p ur ch as e Cu st om er Book offered Done Evaluate offer Bo ok s ho p Assess quality Reject Terrible Assess publication date Offer low price Poor Good Older than 15 years Offer medium price Check is hardcover 15 years or newer Paperback Offer high price Hardcover Task 3 - Automation Using Excel, create a spreadsheet page that automates the above process, allowing a member of the team to enter whether the book is hardcover, its publication year, and its condition, and receive a price to offer. Ensure that you include enough text and formatting to make your spreadsheet usable by a member of the Paperback Basement team, or by a University lecturer. Your spreadsheet should be configured such that the Low, Medium and High prices can be varied easily. Describe how you automated the process (approx 150 words), and attach your Excel file to your ePortfolio. Task 4 - Price setting Using Excel and the historical data you have available, determine sets of prices which meet the objectives of the following scenarios: Scenario one: Total offer prices are approximately the same as for the historical data Scenario two: Assuming all books purchased are sold, allow all staff to draw the same wage as Celia. Describe the strategy you used to find appropriate prices for each scenario (approximately 150 words). CRICOS Provider No. 00103D Page 4 of 5 Ensure that the Low price is less than the Medium price, and both are less than the High price. Bonus challenge task (optional!) Disclaimer: This task is 100% optional, and you can receive full marks without attempting or completing it. It is intended to be a challenge if you are interested in such things, and the marks available do not reflect the significant research and effort required to implement it correctly. Tutors will not provide significant assistance for this challenge task. Optional task 5 Reimplement Task 1 and Task 3 using either Python or HTML+JavaScript. Write a brief overview of how to run your solution, and attach a zip file containing your code to your ePortfolio page. There are no partial marks awarded for this bonus task - you must complete all features to attain the bonus marks. It is possible to attain full marks for this assignment without completing this challenge task. Further details Assignment support This assignment is supported by the first 6 lectures and labs. Work on the assignment should be spread over several weeks after the relevant lab has been mastered. Submission All files should be submitted to Moodle by the due date and time. Check with your tutor as to whether a hard copy is required in addition to the electronic submission. Marking Criteria/Rubric Refer to the attached marking guide. Feedback Feedback will be supplied through Moodle. Authoritative marks will be published through fdlMarks Plagiarism Plagiarism is the presentation of the expressed thought or work of another person as though it is one's own without properly acknowledging that person. You must not allow other students to copy your work and must take care to safeguard against this happening. More information about the plagiarism policy and procedure for the university can be found at http://federation.edu.au/students/learning-and-study/online-help-with/plagiarism. http://federation.edu.au/students/learning-and-study/online-help-with/plagiarism CRICOS Provider No. 00103D Page 5 of 5 Marking Guide: Assignment 1 Feature Criteria Maximum Obtained Operating costs Appropriate projection calculation 2 Configurable hours, rates, fixed annual and monthly costs 2 Description of findings 1 Uses hand-calculated values (-1) Sales team offers Visualization of prices offered per staff member 2 Visualization of change in prices over time 2 Description of findings 1 Automation Spreadsheet accurately models the BPMN process 4 Description of automation 1 Unclear instructions (-1) Price setting Appropriate Low, Medium and High prices for scenario 1 2 Appropriate Low, Medium and High prices for scenario 2 2 Description of strategy 1 Bonus optional challenge task Faithful reimplementation of tasks 1 and 3 using Python or HTML+JavaScript (+2) Total: 20
Answered Same DayAug 30, 2020ITECH1100

Answer To: CRICOS Provider No. 00103D Page 1 of 5 ITECH1100 Understanding the Digital Revolution Assignment 1 -...

Gaurav answered on Aug 30 2020
141 Votes
Sheet1
    Date    Condition    Published    Type    Offer ($)    Andrea    Belle    Celia    Weeknum
    2017-06-17 10:09    Terrible    2011    Paperback    0.2    N    Y    N    24
    2017-06-17 10:37    Terrible    2014    Paperback    0.2    N    Y    N    24
    2017-06-19 10:19    Good    2002    Paperback    3.5    Y    N    N    25
    2017-06-19 10:32    Poor    2009    Paperback    1    Y    N    N    25
    2017-06-19 12:25    Poor    2005    Hardcover    2    Y    N    N    25
    2017-06-19 13:11    Good    1992    Paperback    4.5    N    N    Y    25
    2017-06-19 14:12    Terrible    2007    Paperback    0.2    N    N    Y    25
    2017-06-19 15:24    Poor    2015    Paperback    1.5    N    N    Y    25
    2017-06-19 15:41    Poor    2001    Paperback    1.5    N    N    Y    25
    2017-06-20 09:22    Terrible    2012    Paperback    0.8    Y    N    N    25
    2017-06-20 10:24    Good    1993    Paperback    4.5    Y    N    N    25
    2017-06-20 10:32    Poor    2008    Paperback    1.4    Y    N    N    25
    2017-06-20 11:12    Terrible    2001    Paperback    0.8    Y    N    N    25
    2017-06-20 15:18    Terrible    2011    Paperback    0.2    N    N    Y    25
    2017-0
6-21 09:59    Good    2009    Hardcover    6    Y    N    N    25
    2017-06-21 10:24    Poor    2009    Paperback    1    Y    N    N    25
    2017-06-21 10:38    Poor    2005    Paperback    1.5    Y    N    N    25
    2017-06-21 11:26    Poor    2015    Hardcover    1.6    Y    N    N    25
    2017-06-21 11:59    Poor    2001    Hardcover    1.8    Y    N    N    25
    2017-06-21 12:24    Good    2009    Hardcover    5.8    Y    N    N    25
    2017-06-21 13:10    Terrible    1993    Paperback    0.2    N    N    Y    25
    2017-06-21 13:31    Poor    1987    Paperback    1.5    N    N    Y    25
    2017-06-21 14:41    Poor    2015    Paperback    1.5    N    N    Y    25
    2017-06-21 15:12    Terrible    1982    Paperback    0.2    N    N    Y    25
    2017-06-21 16:23    Good    2014    Paperback    5.5    N    N    Y    25
    2017-06-22 12:03    Poor    1993    Paperback    0.8    N    Y    N    25
    2017-06-22 12:05    Poor    2002    Paperback    0.4    N    Y    N    25
    2017-06-22 14:26    Poor    2001    Paperback    1.5    N    N    Y    25
    2017-06-22 14:50    Poor    2005    Paperback    1.5    N    N    Y    25
    2017-06-23 09:07    Good    1989    Paperback    4.5    N    Y    N    25
    2017-06-23 13:29    Terrible    2016    Paperback    0.2    N    N    Y    25
    2017-06-23 13:36    Poor    1993    Hardcover    2    N    N    Y    25
    2017-06-23 13:37    Poor    2014    Hardcover    2    N    N    Y    25
    2017-06-23 15:14    Terrible    1969    Paperback    0.2    N    N    Y    25
    2017-06-23 15:34    Poor    1987    Hardcover    2    N    N    Y    25
    2017-06-23 16:03    Poor    1975    Paperback    1.5    N    N    Y    25
    2017-06-23 16:43    Terrible    1977    Paperback    0.2    N    N    Y    25
    2017-06-23 16:49    Terrible    2002    Paperback    0.5    N    N    Y    25
    2017-06-23 17:21    Terrible    1977    Paperback    0.2    N    N    Y    25
    2017-06-24 10:38    Terrible    1999    Paperback    0.2    N    Y    N    25
    2017-06-26 10:11    Terrible    2011    Paperback    0    Y    N    N    26
    2017-06-26 10:17    Terrible    1993    Paperback    0.5    Y    N    N    26
    2017-06-26 10:50    Terrible    1993    Paperback    0.2    Y    N    N    26
    2017-06-26 12:05    Poor    2005    Paperback    1    Y    N    N    26
    2017-06-26 12:47    Poor    2011    Paperback    1.5    N    N    Y    26
    2017-06-26 13:21    Terrible    2015    Paperback    0.2    N    N    Y    26
    2017-06-26 13:53    Terrible    1987    Paperback    0.2    N    N    Y    26
    2017-06-27 10:14    Terrible    2014    Paperback    0.4    Y    N    N    26
    2017-06-27 11:28    Terrible    2003    Paperback    0.8    Y    N    N    26
    2017-06-27 11:41    Poor    1993    Hardcover    1.6    Y    N    N    26
    2017-06-27 12:55    Poor    2005    Paperback    1.5    N    N    Y    26
    2017-06-27 13:47    Poor    1989    Paperback    1.5    N    N    Y    26
    2017-06-27 15:52    Poor    1987    Paperback    1.5    N    N    Y    26
    2017-06-28 10:31    Good    1993    Paperback    2.2    Y    N    N    26
    2017-06-28 10:47    Poor    2001    Hardcover    2.6    Y    N    N    26
    2017-06-28 12:04    Poor    2003    Paperback    1.5    Y    N    N    26
    2017-06-28 12:22    Good    1981    Paperback    5    Y    N    N    26
    2017-06-28 12:41    Poor    1997    Paperback    1.5    N    N    Y    26
    2017-06-28 13:02    Terrible    1996    Paperback    0.2    N    N    Y    26
    2017-06-28 14:23    Poor    1997    Paperback    1    N    N    Y    26
    2017-06-28 15:48    Good    1981    Paperback    4.5    N    N    Y    26
    2017-06-28 16:47    Poor    2003    Paperback    1.5    N    N    Y    26
    2017-06-28 17:15    Terrible    1992    Paperback    0.2    N    N    Y    26
    2017-06-29 09:22    Good    2009    Hardcover    10.5    N    Y    N    26
    2017-06-29 10:27    Poor    2009    Paperback    0.8    N    Y    N    26
    2017-06-29 16:03    Good    2005    Hardcover    7.5    N    N    Y    26
    2017-06-29 16:27    Terrible    1968    Paperback    0.2    N    N    Y    26
    2017-06-29 16:37    Poor    1992    Paperback    1.5    N    N    Y    26
    2017-06-30 09:34    Terrible    2007    Paperback    0.2    N    Y    N    26
    2017-06-30 11:11    Terrible    1997    Paperback    0.2    N    Y    N    26
    2017-06-30 14:49    Poor    2009    Hardcover    2.5    N    N    Y    26
    2017-06-30 15:42    Poor    1999    Hardcover    2.5    N    N    Y    26
    2017-06-30 17:17    Poor    2008    Hardcover    2    N    N    Y    26
    2017-07-01 09:20    Poor    1977    Paperback    1.4    N    Y    N    26
    2017-07-01 10:49    Good    2013    Hardcover    6.5    N    Y    N    26
    2017-07-01 11:27    Terrible    1975    Paperback    0.2    N    Y    N    26
    2017-07-01 12:12    Poor    2001    Paperback    0.8    N    Y    N    26
    2017-07-03 09:11    Terrible    1996    Paperback    0    Y    N    N    27
    2017-07-03 09:12    Poor    1993    Hardcover    1.8    Y    N    N    27
    2017-07-03 09:29    Poor    2007    Hardcover    2.4    Y    N    N    27
    2017-07-03 09:48    Terrible    2015    Paperback    0.4    Y    N    N    27
    2017-07-03 10:45    Good    2005    Paperback    2.5    Y    N    N    27
    2017-07-03 12:40    Poor    2010    Paperback    1.5    N    N    Y    27
    2017-07-03 13:30    Good    2001    Hardcover    6    N    N    Y    27
    2017-07-03 15:04    Terrible    2011    Paperback    0.2    N    N    Y    27
    2017-07-03 15:17    Terrible    1977    Paperback    0.2    N    N    Y    27
    2017-07-03 15:21    Good    2002    Hardcover    6    N    N    Y    27
    2017-07-03 15:49    Terrible    1993    Paperback    0.2    N    N    Y    27
    2017-07-03 16:07    Poor    2014    Paperback    1.5    N    N    Y    27
    2017-07-03 17:21    Poor    2005    Paperback    1.5    N    N    Y    27
    2017-07-04 09:10    Terrible    2011    Paperback    0.5    Y    N    N    27
    2017-07-04 09:44    Good    2008    Paperback    4    Y    N    N    27
    2017-07-04 10:04    Poor    2013    Paperback    1    Y    N    N    27
    2017-07-04 11:50    Good    2011    Paperback    3.5    Y    N    N    27
    2017-07-04 12:34    Good    1992    Hardcover    6    N    N    Y    27
    2017-07-04 16:08    Terrible    2015    Paperback    0.2    N    N    Y    27
    2017-07-05 09:19    Poor    1996    Paperback    1    Y    N    N    27
    2017-07-05 10:34    Terrible    1997    Paperback    0.6    Y    N    N    27
    2017-07-05 11:04    Poor    2002    Paperback    1    Y    N    N    27
    2017-07-05 12:20    Good    1969    Paperback    2.6    Y    N    N    27
    2017-07-05 12:33    Terrible    1999    Paperback    0.2    N    N    Y    27
    2017-07-05 13:16    Good    2005    Paperback    5    N    N    Y    27
    2017-07-05 13:39    Poor    1993    Paperback    1.5    N    N    Y    27
    2017-07-05 14:35    Poor    2013    Paperback    1.5    N    N    Y    27
    2017-07-05 16:02    Good    1989    Paperback    5    N    N    Y    27
    2017-07-05 16:25    Terrible    2016    Paperback    0.2    N    N    Y    27
    2017-07-05 16:49    Good    1961    Paperback    5    N    N    Y    27
    2017-07-06 10:00    Good    1961    Paperback    3.5    N    Y    N    27
    2017-07-06 10:31    Good    1993    Paperback    2    N    Y    N    27
    2017-07-06 13:44    Good    2014    Hardcover    6    N    N    Y    27
    2017-07-06 13:58    Terrible    1993    Paperback    0.2    N    N    Y    27
    2017-07-06 14:18    Good    1999    Hardcover    6.5    N    N    Y    27
    2017-07-06 14:24    Good    1968    Hardcover    6    N    N    Y    27
    2017-07-06 14:45    Terrible    2002    Paperback    0.2    N    N    Y    27
    2017-07-06 16:45    Good    2015    Hardcover    7    N    N    Y    27
    2017-07-07 09:25    Terrible    2008    Paperback    0.2    N    Y    N    27
    2017-07-07 10:01    Good    1968    Hardcover    7    N    Y    N    27
    2017-07-07 13:56    Good    1987    Hardcover    6.5    N    N    Y    27
    2017-07-07 16:44    Poor    1982    Hardcover    2    N    N    Y    27
    2017-07-08 10:15    Good    2011    Hardcover    13    N    Y    N    27
    2017-07-08 11:22    Good    1992    Paperback    4.5    N    Y    N    27
    2017-07-10 12:20    Poor    2009    Hardcover    2.2    Y    N    N    28
    2017-07-10 12:37    Terrible    1953    Paperback    0.2    N    N    Y    28
    2017-07-10 12:53    Good    1989    Paperback    5    N    N    Y    28
    2017-07-10 15:03    Terrible    2009    Paperback    0.2    N    N    Y    28
    2017-07-10 15:10    Good    2010    Paperback    5    N    N    Y    28
    2017-07-10 16:29    Terrible    2011    Paperback    0.2    N    N    Y    28
    2017-07-10 17:27    Poor    2013    Paperback    1.5    N    N    Y    28
    2017-07-11 10:13    Good    1982    Paperback    3.4    Y    N    N    28
    2017-07-11 11:57    Poor    1987    Paperback    1    Y    N    N    28
    2017-07-11 13:01    Good    1997    Paperback    4.5    N    N    Y    28
    2017-07-11 13:49    Poor    2002    Paperback    1.5    N    N    Y    28
    2017-07-11 14:19    Poor    1993    Paperback    1.5    N    N    Y    28
    2017-07-11 17:13    Good    2008    Paperback    5.5    N    N    Y    28
    2017-07-12 10:27    Poor    1999    Hardcover    2    Y    N    N    28
    2017-07-12 13:39    Good    1997    Hardcover    6.5    N    N    Y    28
    2017-07-12 14:04    Good    1969    Paperback    5.5    N    N    Y    28
    2017-07-12 14:34    Terrible    1953    Paperback    0.2    N    N    Y    28
    2017-07-12 17:16    Poor    1993    Paperback    1.5    N    N    Y    28
    2017-07-13 09:07    Terrible    2007    Paperback    0.2    N    Y    N    28
    2017-07-13 10:15    Poor    1975    Paperback    0.8    N    Y    N    28
    2017-07-13 12:03    Good    2011    Hardcover    6    N    Y    N    28
    2017-07-13 13:30    Terrible    2011    Paperback    0.2    N    N    Y    28
    2017-07-13 13:52    Good    2014    Hardcover    7.5    N    N    Y    28
    2017-07-13 15:13    Poor    1977    Paperback    1.5    N    N    Y    28
    2017-07-13 15:17    Good    2007    Hardcover    8    N    N    Y    28
    2017-07-13 17:29    Poor    2014    Paperback    1.5    N    N    Y    28
    2017-07-14 09:11    Terrible    1977    Paperback    0.2    N    Y    N    28
    2017-07-14 09:42    Terrible    2005    Paperback    0.2    N    Y    N    28
    2017-07-14 09:42    Terrible    1975    Paperback    0.2    N    Y    N    28
    2017-07-14 10:26    Good    1982    Paperback    2.5    N    Y    N    28
    2017-07-14 11:42    Terrible    1961    Paperback    0.2    N    Y    N    28
    2017-07-14 11:49    Good    1968    Hardcover    7    N    Y    N    28
    2017-07-14 12:00    Poor    1997    Paperback    0.8    N    Y    N    28
    2017-07-14 13:02    Good    1987    Hardcover    7    N    N    Y    28
    2017-07-14 13:24    Poor    2003    Hardcover    2.5    N    N    Y    28
    2017-07-14...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions ยป

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here