Contrast and compare the fact situation in the opening scenario and the Alaskan case of Whiting v. State presented in this chapter. What are the similarities, and what are the points that could be used to argue that the law does not apply?
How does the general duty to inform the court preserve the integrity of the judicial process? See Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co., 322 U.S. 238 (1944).
Already registered? Login
Not Account? Sign up
Enter your email address to reset your password
Back to Login? Click here