Microsoft Word - First assignment - Final 1.docx Background You’ve been lucky enough to secure a graduate position working for Dennis Denuto in the Coolaroo office of Dennis Denuto & Associates. You...

1 answer below »

Contract law- Memorandum of advice to a supervising lawyer. Reference must be AGLC. must follow attached instruction and mark distribution




Microsoft Word - First assignment - Final 1.docx Background You’ve been lucky enough to secure a graduate position working for Dennis Denuto in the Coolaroo office of Dennis Denuto & Associates. You come into work one morning and Dennis isn’t anywhere to be seen. When you log on to your computer you find the following email: Hi there, I’m going to be away for a couple of weeks – going to Bonnie Doon on a bit of a junket with a long-standing client of the firm – Darryl Kerrigan. I’d appreciate it if you can keep things running in my absence. I’m sure you’re up to the job – as long as you don’t use the photocopier, everything should be fine. The main thing I need you to look after while I’m away is a matter for my client Stuart Bloom, he owns Stuart’s Comic Books in Elizabeth Street, Coolaroo. They sell all kinds of pop culture stuff – comics, board games and dolls. They’re quite stressed about some threats to sue that they’re receiving from a guy called Sheldon Cooper and we need to advise them whether there was a contract or not. I just want you to look at the common law issues for now, we’ll worry about any implications under the Australian Consumer Law later. I’ll be back at midnight on 25 August 2019 and will come by the office. Please make sure that there’s a memo for me on my desk1 when I walk in the door setting out whether any agreements have been formed and why you have reached the conclusions you’ve reached. Dennis The File Your next step is to read the file, and the information there tells the following story:  On 18 February Sheldon Cooper visits Stuart’s comic book store in Coolaroo, a suburb in the northern area of Melbourne, Victoria. There he finds a mint condition, still in the box, “Dr Spock” action figure priced at $750. (There is a picture on the file).  Sheldon is a huge fan of the Star Trek show was really keen to buy the toy. Sheldon speaks to Stuart at length about the toy and after some negotiation, Stuart says that he is willing to sell the action figure to Sheldon for $600.  Sheldon tells Stuart “I absolutely love it. I’ve just built a cabinet to display all my action figures and this one would make my set complete, so I am definitely interested in buying it. I think I could afford it if I paid in two instalments”.  Stuart does not reply as he is interrupted by the telephone ringing. Sheldon leaves the store after taking one of Stuart’s business cards.  At 10am on 21 February, after thinking about the action figure some more, Sheldon tries to ring Stuart to offer him $550 for the action figure, payment immediately. He cannot get through so he sends an SMS message to same mobile number he found on Stuart’s business card.  Stuart reads the SMS about 10 minutes later and immediately replies Sheldon to let him know that he will accept $575, provided he pays in full by 23 February. Sheldon says he will have to think about it.  A copy of the SMS exchange is on the file. 1 By desk, Dennis means submitted via Canvas through Turnitin ?  On the afternoon of 23 February, Sheldon again tries to telephone Stuart and cannot get through. This time he sends him an email in which says he will buy the Spock doll for $550, and that he will pick up it up the following day.  A copy of the email is on the file.  Stuart is flat out all afternoon and does not read his emails until the following morning at 10am. Unfortunately for Sheldon, Stuart has just sold the doll to Howard for $600. Attachment 1 – Action Figure Attachement 2 – SMS exchange Required Write a memo to Dennis answering his question (is there a contract at common law) and explaining the reasons for your answer. Your memo must:  Answer the question that Dennis has asked;  Identify the key issues;  Articulate the relevant common law rules  Apply the law to the issues and facts;  incorporate a clear, logical and actionable conclusion; and  be written in language appropriate for your audience (another lawyer), using key terminology consistenty and appropirately, incorporate references in AGLC4 format, including a complete reference list which shows your boss all of the materials you considered, even if you don’t directly refer to them in your memorandum. For the avoidance of any confusion:  You are not required to calculate or examine any remedies that may be available to Mr Cooper in the event that a contract exists.  The word limit is 2000 words excluding references  This task contributes to 20% of your overall grade  You must submit via Canvas/Turnitin prior to midnight on 25 August 2019 unless you have received an extension of time in writing. This task will be marked out of 100 and assessed by reference to the following criteria: Task 1 will be assessed by reference to the following rubric Criteria Pts Identify the issues The extent to which you have properly identified the legal issues and explained why the issues are issues or need investigation. This includes identifying and articulating any assumptions necessary to solve the problem or any further questions you consider need addressing. 20.0 pts Rules The extent to which you clearly articulate what the relevant rules are in language appropriate for your audience. 15.0 pts Apply the Law The extent to which you apply the law that you've identified to the issues / facts. 30.0 pts Reach a conclusion The extent to which your conclusions are logical, actionable and clear. 15.0 pts Presentation & referencing Relates to the structure of your memorandum, your use of technical terminology, your grammar, spelling and punctuation and your use of AGLC3. 20.0 pts A more detailed rubric is available in Canvas.
Answered Same DayAug 18, 2021LAW2524

Answer To: Microsoft Word - First assignment - Final 1.docx Background You’ve been lucky enough to secure a...

Debbani answered on Aug 22 2021
149 Votes
MEMORNDUM OF ADVICE
    MEMORNDUM OF ADVICE    CONTRACTUAL ASPECTS
    
    
    MEMORNDUM OF ADVICE    CONTRACTUAL ASPECTS
    
    
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mr. Dennis Denuto, Instructing Lawyer
Dennis Denuto & Associates (Coolaroo office)
FROM: Mr LMN PQR
DATE: 22nd August 2019
FILE : Sheldon Cooper and Stuart
SUB:- Existence of Contract under Common Law
Table of Contents
1. BACKGROUND    3
2. FACTS    3
3. ASSUMPTIONS    3
4. ISSUES    3
5. CONCLUSIONS    4
6. LEGISLATIONS    4
7. DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS    4
8. Sources Consulted- Bibliography    9
1. BACK
GROUND
I am advised by the Instructing Lawyer Dennis Denuto in the Coolaroo office of Dennis Denuto & Associates, to find that under the Common Law system, whether there exists a contract followed by the enforceable agreement between Sheldon Cooper and Stuart.
2. FACTS
Sheldon Cooper (SC) finds, an action figure in a comic book store of Stuart (S) for a tagged price of $ 750 on 18th February. After discussion on the figure, S offered the figure for a price of $ 600, to which SC expressed that he can pay that amount in two instalments. On 21st February, SC offered to pay $ 550 to S, to which S renewed the amount to be $ 575, to be paid within 23rd of February, where SC wanted some more time to decide. On 23rd of February, SC mailed S and expressed his willingness to buy the item at a certain price, which was overlooked by S and hence it was sold to Howard (H) for $ 600.
3. ASSUMPTIONS
Under common law regimen, normally the adverts on the shop windows or in brochures or maybe in media is considered as an invitation to treat and not an offer, So, an advertisement can take the form of an offer if the intention is clear and specific so as to bound the accepting party that is the offeree with the terms laid by the offeror. As the present facts do not depict any aspect of unilateral contract, since the acceptance is not required to be made by actual performance and not by acting according to the promise, so it is assumed that a bilateral contract was intended.
4. ISSUES
Whether there exists a contract followed by the enforceable agreement between Sheldon Cooper and Stuart
5. CONCLUSIONS
To answer whether under the Common Law system, there exists a contract followed by the enforceable agreement between Sheldon Cooper and Stuart, it can be concluded that there was no existence of contract between SC and S. Since in the first instance, SC made a counter offer which in itself extinguished the original offer made by S. Secondly, SC did not pay any token money or a minimum consideration so that the promise to keep the action figure till a certain period of time becomes an unenforceable gratuitous promise. Thirdly, based on the unenforceable gratuitous promise, if S sells the action figure to H or any other person, SC cannot enforce any binding contract as against S, since from the first instance there was no existence of any contract so as to make it binding as against S and thus cannot obligate S to perform his contractual obligation. Although the final email sent by SC was overlooked by S, even if it was overlooked then also no binding contract exists since Sc lost the potential option contract by not providing minimum consideration and secondly, he again stated a new price which again became a counter offer. Thus, it can be concluded that there was no formation of a contract between SC and S only due to the fact that there was no unconditional acceptance of the offer made by SC for the offer S provided.
6. LEGISLATIONS
No Legislations is used, since I am only instructed to follow the Common Law aspects.
7. DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
Under the Law of Contract, a contract comes into existence on fulfilment of certain criterions. Firstly, there must be an offer followed by the unconditional acceptance, with a valid intention between the parties to create the legal relationship as was depicted in case of Forrest v ASIC [2012][footnoteRef:1], Ermogenous v Greek Orthodox Community of SA Inc [2002][footnoteRef:2], Ashton v Pratt [2015][footnoteRef:3], to make them legally enforceable as was mentioned in Banque Brussels Lambert SA v Australian National Industries Ltd (1989)[footnoteRef:4], Price v Southern Cross Television (TNT9) Pty Ltd [2015][footnoteRef:5], Malago Pty Ltd v AW Ellis Engineering Pty Ltd [2012] [footnoteRef:6], with an exception in case of Australian Woollen Mills Pty Ltd v Commonwealth of Australia (1954)[footnoteRef:7], and finally the presence of the capacity to enter in to a binding contract. In the instant facts of the case, the action figure was on display with a price stated on it. So, displaying certain item for the intended sale is not offer under the Contract Law but a mere invitation to treat. It is evident that all proposals do not have the force or the certainty to be an offer. Hence, to be qualified as an offer, there must be the presence of an indication or an willingness by the offeror that when the offer becomes directed or offered to the intended party then the on acceptance of that party there is a possibility that the enforceable contract will come into existence at the very instant when the offer is accepted. But, there is the basic difference between offer and the invitation to treat, since the later is a mere negotiation which can take the...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here