Consumer Protection: Case Study The Saigon is a famous Vietnamese takeaway shop located in the Shopping Centre in the Eastern Suburbs. Pork Belly Banh Mi is their best seller. Generally, they are only...

1 answer below »


Consumer Protection: Case Study



The Saigon is a famous Vietnamese takeaway shop located in the Shopping Centre in the Eastern Suburbs. Pork Belly Banh Mi is their best seller. Generally, they are only busy in the morning and at lunchtime. Their opening hours are 8.00 am to 5.00 pm. After 2.00 pm the shop is very quiet since everyone is back at work. Debbie, the owner is planning to offer happy hour specials starting at 2.00 pm. She proposes to sell the Pork Banh Mi cheaper than the normal price of $9.50. Huyen, the Manager agrees with her idea to increase the sales. It also helps to minize wastage as they can’t keep the Banh Mi bread until the next day since it gets stale quickly.


The 'happy hour' initiative is a success and they sell all the bread every day. However, the price of the pork belly used in the banh mi has recently increased. So, instead of using pork belly, Debbie suggested that they use pork jowl which is cheaper. This means that the quality of the food is not as good as it contains a higher level of fat. Huyen did not particularly agree with Debbie’s suggestion but has not raised any objections.


Adam as a loyal customer figured the different quality of the pork rolls and tried to complain to Huyen. Adam also complained that he got charged 50 cents from the credit card payment last time without being informed prior to payment. The Saigon restaurant also received many complaints about the quality of the rolls and bad reviews on social media.



Questions



  1. What are the main aspects of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010?


  2. How many breaches of consumer law are in this case study and what are they?


  3. Who is at fault for the quality of the pork Banh Mi and what sections of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 were breached?


  4. What section/s of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 were breached with the card payment surcharged and what are the consequences?


  5. Who can Adam report this incident to?


  6. What are some of the consequences and fines of breaching the Competition and Consumer Act 2010?





Instructions:

Answer all the above case study questions.


Support your responses to the case study questions with reference to relevant secondary sources.


Do not copy the scenario case study in your submission. Only include the questions and your answer to each respective question.


Adhere to the APA formatting and referencing standards.


all reseach and referencing should be taken from legit australian government website


just copy the question before the answer


make sure it will pass the turnitin

Answered 2 days AfterAug 03, 2021

Answer To: Consumer Protection: Case Study The Saigon is a famous Vietnamese takeaway shop located in the...

Karishma answered on Aug 06 2021
154 Votes
Answer 1:
The intent and aspect of the consumer act was intended to curb the malpractices in the areas of the market i.e. to regulate the relationship betwee
n circle chain starting from Supplier to Business [including all retail selling / wholesalers], from Business to Consumer. The main purpose of the act is to enhance the wellbeing of the people in Australia and also to promote best trading and competition practices in the industry. There are various key principle that help to keep check on fair practices such as Guarantees, deemed ethical business. Therefore following are the main aspect and objectives of the act i.e. to maintain and accordingly promote healthy industry competition by adhering to fair industry practices, by imposing the guarantees and henceforth ensuring the protection, health and safety of the consumers.
Answer: 2
In the given case law, there are various breaches that have occurred in the business. Breach on the Misleading or conduct which are very likely to deceive the consumers. Usually the representation or conduct of business attracts the audience. Representation with respect to pricing, styling, quality, quantity of the services must be adhered to by the business. In this case, using low quality of material in order to increase the profits is an example of such misleading conduct. Further, the change of material quality was not even informed to the customers. Secondly, this also triggers the unconscionable business conduct by Saigon. Thirdly, there is continuous misuse of market power as Saigon is a shop which is very famous and holds...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here