Computer Exercise I 1. Estimate the correlation (coefficient) between two assets based on real data. Note that for our purpose, correlation means return correlation not correlation between prices of...

1 answer below »
Fianancial anaysis


Computer Exercise I 1. Estimate the correlation (coefficient) between two assets based on real data. Note that for our purpose, correlation means return correlation not correlation between prices of two assets. (a) Describe briefly what each of the following ETFs does: SPY, LQD, GSG, SDS, SSO, and SHV (b) Download monthly prices of these six ETFs over the period 08/01/2010−07/01/2018 from Yahoo or other sources you like. (c) Compute monthly returns for Aug. 2010, Sep. 2010, …, May 2018, and June 2018 using the adj. close prices, for each of the six ETFs. For example, to compute the return for Aug. 2010, you use the prices for 09/01/2010 and 08/01/2010. Note that while the monthly price series begins on 8/1/2010, the monthly return series begins on 9/1/2010. Note: Return = (Final Price – Initial Price)/Initial Price. (d) Estimate the following six correlation coefficients using Excel function CORREL: a. The correlation coefficients between SPY and each of the other five ETFs; b. The correlation coefficient between LQD and GSG. You may refer to Example 6.1 in Chapter 6 in the textbook (p. 151 in the 11th edition) on how to use excel function CORREL to compute the correlation. If necessary, you may refer to the following files posted on Canvas under “Projects” on how to get data from Yahoo and calculate returns using downloaded data: (i) “howToGetHistPrcFromYahoo.pdf” has instructions on how to download historical prices from Yahoo and then calculate returns using the prices. (ii) “example-correlation-beta-slope.xls” illustrates how to calculate monthly returns of XOM and S&P500 from historical prices and then estimate the correlation between the returns of XOM and S&P500 using function CORREL. Things to turn in (Please organize your work appropriately and label each tab clearly): (i) a brief description of each of the six ETFs; (ii) the monthly returns (not prices) of the six ETFs (it is better to place all six monthly return series in one spreadsheet) (iii) the estimates of the six correlation coefficients specified in part (d) of Question 1; and (iv) a brief discussion of whether your estimates of the six correlations are consistent with your intuition. E.g., should SPY and SSO be highly correlated? Is your estimate of their correlation consistent with your expectation? Page 1 2. Construct the efficient frontier of SPY and LQD using real data. (a) You need to estimate five input parameters in this case: the expected returns and standard deviations of SPY and LQD, and their correlation. Suppose you use monthly returns of the SPY and LQD over the period 09/01/2010−07/01/2018 – that are obtained in Question 1 – to estimate those five parameters. Note: The main reason for choosing this particular period (09/01/2010−07/01/2018) is that both SPY and LQD have a positive average return over the period, which makes it possible to estimate the expected return using the average return. (b) Estimate the average monthly return and standard deviation of the monthly returns for SPY. Then estimate the average monthly return and standard deviation of the monthly returns for LQD. Recall that the correlation between SPY and LQD is already estimated in Question 1. (c) Annualize the average returns and standard deviations of SPY and LQD obtained in part (b) using monthly data. You can use the following formulas to do that annualized avg. return = (1 + monthly avg return)^12 - 1; annualized std. dev. = monthly std. dev. * sqrt(12). See also “example-correlation-beta-slope.xls” on to do this. Correlation need not be annualized. (d) Assume that both the expected returns and standard deviations of SPY and LQD going forward are the same as their annualized average returns and standard deviations obtained in part (c), respectively. Tabulate the investment opportunity set of these two ETFs. Namely, select, say, 20 different portfolios (of SPY and LQD), with SPY’s weight ranging from -0.5 to 1.5 with an incremental of 0.1. Then calculate the expected return and standard deviation for each of the 20 portfolios. Spreadsheet 6.5 in Chapter 6 in the textbook (p.154 in the 11e) provides a similar example. (e) Plot the expected returns of 20 portfolios (the y-variable) vs. these portfolios’ standard deviations (the x-variable) to generate a curve (whose upper branch is the efficient frontier). If you want, you can use “example-efficientFrontier.xls” posted on Canvas as a template. Things to turn in (Please organize your work appropriately and label each tab clearly): (i) a brief description of SPY and LQD; (ii) the estimates of both monthly and annualized average returns and standard deviations of these two ETFs, and the estimate of the correlation between these two ETFs; (iii) the tabulated investment opportunity set (say, 20 different portfolios of SPY and LQD) and the corresponding portfolio expected returns and standard deviations; and (iv) a properly labeled graph of the investment opportunity set (the curve) – namely, labeling the x-axis and y-axis of your plot at least. 3. Consider an investor who plans to allocate $10,000 to SPY, LQD, and cash, using the asset allocation model introduced in our Fin406 class. Use the annualized average returns, annualized standard deviations, and the correlation estimated earlier in Question 2 (part C). The risk-free rate is assumed to be 2% for this question. (a) Determine the tangency portfolio using Eq. (6.10) in Chapter 6 in the textbook. (b) Consider three investors whose risk aversion coefficients (coefficient A) are 8.0, 12.0, and 16.0, respectively. Determine these three investors’ optimal complete portfolios. You can use “example-assetAllocator.xls” posted on Canvas as a template for this exercise. Things to turn in (Please organize your work appropriately and label each tab clearly): (i) the annualized average returns and annualized standard deviations of SPY and LQD; the correlation coefficient between SPY and LQD; and the risk-free interest; (ii) the portfolio weights of SPY and LQD in the tangency portfolio; (iii) the expected return and standard deviation of the tangency portfolio; and (iv) the three investors’ optimal complete portfolios (including both portfolio weights and dollar amounts invested on the three asset classes). 4. You are asked to estimate betas of the following four funds against the S&P 500 index in this question: the Vanguard Market Neutral Fund (ticker: VMNFX), the ProShares Ultra S&P500 ETF (SSO), Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (ticker: XLP), and Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR ETF (ticker: XLY). Intuitively, the ranking of these four funds by beta should look like this: VMNFX < xlp="">< xly="">< sso (why?). now estimate these funds’ betas and see if your estimates are consistent with your intuition. (a) download monthly prices of these four funds and the s&p 500 index (yahoo ticker ^gspc) over the past five years from yahoo and then compute their monthly returns using the adj. close prices. (b) beta can be estimated using either returns or excess returns. as such, please estimate each fund’s beta (against the s&p 500) using the excel function slope (see below on how to use this function). recall that beta is the slope of the sml. note: (i) function slope has two arguments: slope(y-array, x-array), where the 1st argument represents the y-variable (returns of a fund) and the 2nd argument represents the x-variable (returns of the s&p 500). for example, xlp’s beta = slope(xlp returns, gspc returns). (ii) you may also refer to “example-correlation-beta-slope.xls” posted on canvas on how to estimate beta. (iii) see question 1 of this project on how to download historical prices from yahoo and calculate monthly returns (iv) formula for return: return = (final price – initial price)/initial price. things to turn in (please organize your work appropriately and label each tab clearly): (i) a brief description of vmnfx, sso, xlp, and xly; (ii) monthly returns of vmnfx, sso, xlp, xly and the s&p 500 index over the past 5 years; (iii) your estimates of the four funds’ betas against the s&p 500; and (iv) short answers to question: is the ranking of the four funds by beta consistent with your intuition? 5. analyze the performance of the mutual fund lmvtx (once managed by the well-known fund manager bill miller), discussed in example 7 in notes lecs04-11-part2-capm. (a) download monthly prices of the lmvtx and the s&p 500 index (yahoo ticker ^gspc) over the period 10/02/2000-09/30/2003 from yahoo and then compute their monthly returns using the adj. close prices. note: (i) see question 1 of this project on how to download historical prices from yahoo and calculate monthly returns. (ii) formula for return: return = (final price – initial price)/initial price. (iii) the monthly return series of the fund (or the index) will start from november 1, 2000, although the fund price on 10/02/2000 is needed for the calculation of the fund return for october 2000. (b) calculate the monthly excess returns of lmvtx and the s&p 500, where the excess return = return – risk free rate. although the risk-free rate is assumed to be constant in portfolio theory covered in fin 406, the risk-free rate itself is not a constant and varies over time in the real world. the time-series data on the risk-free rate for this question are available in “risk-free-rate.xls” posted on canvas under the folder “projects.” (c) estimate the beta of lmvtx using the excel function slope. note: use slope(y-array, x-array), where the 1st argument represents the y-variable (the fund lmvtx’s excess returns) and the 2nd argument represents the x-variable (the s&p’s excess returns). also, refer to question 4 of this project on how to estimate beta using function slope. (d) estimate lmvtx's beta as well as alpha against the s&p500 using regression in excel. by the way, the fund beta estimated using regression should be close to the estimate obtained in part (c). here are two methods for running a regression in excel: (1) following example 6.3 in chapter 6 in the textbook; (2) following the instructions given below in the appendix on the next page (e) replace the s&p500 index by the russell 2000 index (yahoo ticker ^rut), and then redo the regression analysis to obtain the alpha and beta of lmvtx against the russell 2000 index. note: (i) “example-correlation-beta-slope.xls” posted on canvas illustrates how to estimate xom’s beta against the s&p500 using function slope. (ii) if you do it correctly, your estimates of alpha and beta should be close to (not necessarily the same as) those shown in example 7 in notes lecs04-11-part2-capm (see also the example in the appendix below on page 7). things to turn in (please organize your work appropriately and label each tab clearly): (i) the monthly returns of lmvtx, the s&p500, and the russell 2000, and the monthly risk-free interest; (ii) a graph of lmvtx vs. the s&p 500 that includes the regression line, the regression equation and the r-squared (similar to the example shown on page 7 of this document); and (iii) a graph of lmvtx vs. the russell 2000 that includes the regression line, the regression equation and the r-squared. appendix: how to run a regression in excel? consider the following sso="" (why?).="" now="" estimate="" these="" funds’="" betas="" and="" see="" if="" your="" estimates="" are="" consistent="" with="" your="" intuition.="" (a)="" download="" monthly="" prices="" of="" these="" four="" funds="" and="" the="" s&p="" 500="" index="" (yahoo="" ticker="" ^gspc)="" over="" the="" past="" five="" years="" from="" yahoo="" and="" then="" compute="" their="" monthly="" returns="" using="" the="" adj.="" close="" prices.="" (b)="" beta="" can="" be="" estimated="" using="" either="" returns="" or="" excess="" returns.="" as="" such,="" please="" estimate="" each="" fund’s="" beta="" (against="" the="" s&p="" 500)="" using="" the="" excel="" function="" slope="" (see="" below="" on="" how="" to="" use="" this="" function).="" recall="" that="" beta="" is="" the="" slope="" of="" the="" sml.="" note:="" (i)="" function="" slope="" has="" two="" arguments:="" slope(y-array,="" x-array),="" where="" the="" 1st="" argument="" represents="" the="" y-variable="" (returns="" of="" a="" fund)="" and="" the="" 2nd="" argument="" represents="" the="" x-variable="" (returns="" of="" the="" s&p="" 500).="" for="" example,="" xlp’s="" beta="slope(XLP" returns,="" gspc="" returns).="" (ii)="" you="" may="" also="" refer="" to="" “example-correlation-beta-slope.xls”="" posted="" on="" canvas="" on="" how="" to="" estimate="" beta.="" (iii)="" see="" question="" 1="" of="" this="" project="" on="" how="" to="" download="" historical="" prices="" from="" yahoo="" and="" calculate="" monthly="" returns="" (iv)="" formula="" for="" return:="" return="(Final" price="" –="" initial="" price)/initial="" price.="" things="" to="" turn="" in="" (please="" organize="" your="" work="" appropriately="" and="" label="" each="" tab="" clearly):="" (i)="" a="" brief="" description="" of="" vmnfx,="" sso,="" xlp,="" and="" xly;="" (ii)="" monthly="" returns="" of="" vmnfx,="" sso,="" xlp,="" xly="" and="" the="" s&p="" 500="" index="" over="" the="" past="" 5="" years;="" (iii)="" your="" estimates="" of="" the="" four="" funds’="" betas="" against="" the="" s&p="" 500;="" and="" (iv)="" short="" answers="" to="" question:="" is="" the="" ranking="" of="" the="" four="" funds="" by="" beta="" consistent="" with="" your="" intuition?="" 5.="" analyze="" the="" performance="" of="" the="" mutual="" fund="" lmvtx="" (once="" managed="" by="" the="" well-known="" fund="" manager="" bill="" miller),="" discussed="" in="" example="" 7="" in="" notes="" lecs04-11-part2-capm.="" (a)="" download="" monthly="" prices="" of="" the="" lmvtx="" and="" the="" s&p="" 500="" index="" (yahoo="" ticker="" ^gspc)="" over="" the="" period="" 10/02/2000-09/30/2003="" from="" yahoo="" and="" then="" compute="" their="" monthly="" returns="" using="" the="" adj.="" close="" prices.="" note:="" (i)="" see="" question="" 1="" of="" this="" project="" on="" how="" to="" download="" historical="" prices="" from="" yahoo="" and="" calculate="" monthly="" returns.="" (ii)="" formula="" for="" return:="" return="(Final" price="" –="" initial="" price)/initial="" price.="" (iii)="" the="" monthly="" return="" series="" of="" the="" fund="" (or="" the="" index)="" will="" start="" from="" november="" 1,="" 2000,="" although="" the="" fund="" price="" on="" 10/02/2000="" is="" needed="" for="" the="" calculation="" of="" the="" fund="" return="" for="" october="" 2000.="" (b)="" calculate="" the="" monthly="" excess="" returns="" of="" lmvtx="" and="" the="" s&p="" 500,="" where="" the="" excess="" return="return" –="" risk="" free="" rate.="" although="" the="" risk-free="" rate="" is="" assumed="" to="" be="" constant="" in="" portfolio="" theory="" covered="" in="" fin="" 406,="" the="" risk-free="" rate="" itself="" is="" not="" a="" constant="" and="" varies="" over="" time="" in="" the="" real="" world.="" the="" time-series="" data="" on="" the="" risk-free="" rate="" for="" this="" question="" are="" available="" in="" “risk-free-rate.xls”="" posted="" on="" canvas="" under="" the="" folder="" “projects.”="" (c)="" estimate="" the="" beta="" of="" lmvtx="" using="" the="" excel="" function="" slope.="" note:="" use="" slope(y-array,="" x-array),="" where="" the="" 1st="" argument="" represents="" the="" y-variable="" (the="" fund="" lmvtx’s="" excess="" returns)="" and="" the="" 2nd="" argument="" represents="" the="" x-variable="" (the="" s&p’s="" excess="" returns).="" also,="" refer="" to="" question="" 4="" of="" this="" project="" on="" how="" to="" estimate="" beta="" using="" function="" slope.="" (d)="" estimate="" lmvtx's="" beta="" as="" well="" as="" alpha="" against="" the="" s&p500="" using="" regression="" in="" excel.="" by="" the="" way,="" the="" fund="" beta="" estimated="" using="" regression="" should="" be="" close="" to="" the="" estimate="" obtained="" in="" part="" (c).="" here="" are="" two="" methods="" for="" running="" a="" regression="" in="" excel:="" (1)="" following="" example="" 6.3="" in="" chapter="" 6="" in="" the="" textbook;="" (2)="" following="" the="" instructions="" given="" below="" in="" the="" appendix="" on="" the="" next="" page="" (e)="" replace="" the="" s&p500="" index="" by="" the="" russell="" 2000="" index="" (yahoo="" ticker="" ^rut),="" and="" then="" redo="" the="" regression="" analysis="" to="" obtain="" the="" alpha="" and="" beta="" of="" lmvtx="" against="" the="" russell="" 2000="" index.="" note:="" (i)="" “example-correlation-beta-slope.xls”="" posted="" on="" canvas="" illustrates="" how="" to="" estimate="" xom’s="" beta="" against="" the="" s&p500="" using="" function="" slope.="" (ii)="" if="" you="" do="" it="" correctly,="" your="" estimates="" of="" alpha="" and="" beta="" should="" be="" close="" to="" (not="" necessarily="" the="" same="" as)="" those="" shown="" in="" example="" 7="" in="" notes="" lecs04-11-part2-capm="" (see="" also="" the="" example="" in="" the="" appendix="" below="" on="" page="" 7).="" things="" to="" turn="" in="" (please="" organize="" your="" work="" appropriately="" and="" label="" each="" tab="" clearly):="" (i)="" the="" monthly="" returns="" of="" lmvtx,="" the="" s&p500,="" and="" the="" russell="" 2000,="" and="" the="" monthly="" risk-free="" interest;="" (ii)="" a="" graph="" of="" lmvtx="" vs.="" the="" s&p="" 500="" that="" includes="" the="" regression="" line,="" the="" regression="" equation="" and="" the="" r-squared="" (similar="" to="" the="" example="" shown="" on="" page="" 7="" of="" this="" document);="" and="" (iii)="" a="" graph="" of="" lmvtx="" vs.="" the="" russell="" 2000="" that="" includes="" the="" regression="" line,="" the="" regression="" equation="" and="" the="" r-squared.="" appendix:="" how="" to="" run="" a="" regression="" in="" excel?="" consider="" the="">
Answered Same DayNov 04, 2021

Answer To: Computer Exercise I 1. Estimate the correlation (coefficient) between two assets based on real data....

Himanshu answered on Nov 08 2021
147 Votes
Answer 1 a.)
· SPY- The SPY ETF is one of the main common funds to monitor the Standard & Poor's 500 Index, which incorporates 500 U.S. large and mid-cap shares. These shares are chosen by a panel on the basis of market position, stability and busin
ess.
· LQD- iShares iBoxx $Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF aims to measure the investment performance of an index made up of U.S. dollar-denominated investment grade mutual funds.
· GSG is a product portfolio monitoring the S&P GSCI edition, giving it a reasonably balanced correlation to the wide market for energy sources. Rather than keeping shares on the underlying goods, GSG retains only long-standing agreements on the GSCI itself, as well as often very large cash and T-Bill reserves.
· SDS offers a 1-day leveraged bet against the S&P 500 in a very flexible mechanism that is well matched with the strategic essence of the stock. Like other leveraged and inverse offerings, the Fund is structured to offer 2x inverse sensitivity to its index — the S&P 500—only for 1 day and 1 day.
· The ProShares Ultra S&P500 ETF SSO offers 2x diversified allocation to the market-cap-weighted index of 500 large and mid-cap US firms chosen by S&P. As a levered commodity, SSO is not a purchase-and-hold ETF; it is a short-term tactical tool. As several leveraged funds, it offers its 2x leverage just over a one-day time frame. For extended durations, yields will differ dramatically from the 2x goal returns in the headline.
· SHV offers U.S. insanely-short-term debt securities in an affordable and usable basket. The Fund owns assets with a maturity of 12 months or less. SHV monitors a large vanilla index which reflects very well the ultra-short-term U.S. stock market.
Answer 2
· SPY- The SPY ETF is one of the main common funds to monitor the Standard & Poor's 500 Index, which incorporates 500 U.S. large and mid-cap shares. These shares are chosen by a panel on the basis of market position, stability and business.
· LQD- iShares iBoxx $Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF aims to measure the investment performance of an index made up of U.S. dollar-denominated investment grade mutual funds.
Answer 4
· VMNFX- Vanguard Market Neutral Fund The investment aims to have long-term capital gains while restricting sensitivity to overall market risk. The Fund employs a market-neutral approach that supervisors describe as a tactic for the development of a investment that is positive with regard to the general risk of the investment market.
·...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here