COLLAPSE SUBDISCUSSIONTrent Nguyen Trent Nguyen 7:56amAug 5 at 7:56amManage Discussion Entry Marcus: This is why peer-reviewed scholarly sources are always preferred over non-peer-reviewed ones. When...

1 answer below »

COLLAPSE SUBDISCUSSION
Trent Nguyen


Trent Nguyen

7:56amAug 5 at 7:56amManage Discussion Entry

Marcus:


This is why peer-reviewed scholarly sources are always preferred over non-peer-reviewed ones. When sources that have been reviewed by experts, the quality is present. At times, editors can ask researchers to provide the raw data in order for a manuscript to be reviewed for publication. As a qualitative researcher when you interview participants, the same manner of asking questions should be the same, your mannerisms should be consistent, etc., in order to increase the trustworthiness of the data. Just remember you are a researcher collecting data, not a therapist per se, especially when participants struggle with sharing intimate, difficult details. When qualitative researchers engage in research, they usually suspend their perspectives on a phenomenon, and to allow themes and patterns to emerge organically, based on the data collected.






COLLAPSE SUBDISCUSSION
Lateia Smith


Lateia Smith

8:42pmAug 5 at 8:42pmManage Discussion Entry

Qualitative research or methods will identify trends based on data trustworthiness. Credibility (internal validity) is established through triangulation and contributes to the reliability and reality; Triangulation involves checking multiple methods utilized, including observations, interviews, and documents (Merriam & Tisdell, 2016). Triangulation can involve independent analyzers to cross-reference the researcher’s data collection findings. Triangulation increases credibility, reliability, and validation in your research. Member checks are conducted to ensure credibility and validity and help fill in any gaps from the interviews. Data audits are conducted to validate reliability, especially among peer reviews in which analyzers can confirm the validity of the raw data (Merriam & Tisdell, 2016). Qualitative research allows for replication, which falls under reliability or confirmability. If replicated, it produces the same static results (although this is not valid, no human participants are alike, and responses will usually differ). Researchers need to prove that results are independent and do not produce unconscious or conscious biases. Merriam and Tisdell (2016) content transferability or external validity attempts to generalize the study as it applies to other situations or contexts. Qualitative research requires purposeful or nonprobability sampling, which is used to understand the depths of the specific data relative to the context of what was collected (Merriam & Tisdell, 2016). A purposive sampling includes the characteristics of what was directly related to the research questions.


Reference


Merriam, S. B., Tisdell, E. J. (2016).Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation(4th ed). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Answered Same DayAug 06, 2021

Answer To: COLLAPSE SUBDISCUSSIONTrent Nguyen Trent Nguyen 7:56amAug 5 at 7:56amManage Discussion Entry Marcus:...

Deblina answered on Aug 06 2021
163 Votes
Response Post        4
RESPONSE POST
Table of Contents
Response Post 1    3
Response Post 2    3
References    5
Response Post 1
I agree wit
h your point that peer-reviewed scholarly sources are essentially important and should be preferred over non-peer-reviewed scholarly sources. Peer-reviewed scholarly resources are more significant because it is subjective to authors scholarly work and research that is valid and it is evaluated effectively. It should be always preferred to that of nonpeer reviewed scholarly sources because every peer-reviewed scholarly work undergoes a preliminary desk review that makes it authentic and retains the highest quality. Normally a scholarly work is accepted after it is being reviewed by peers of the same field (Aguinis et al., 2019). This sustains the fact that peer-reviewed scholarly works are of good quality and the work fall within the journal's area of specialization and satisfies the originality required by the journal in the question.
I support your recommendation that the manner of asking questions must be consistent such that the trustworthiness of the data increases. It is evident that collecting data in a similar manner do not distort data and retains the viability of the data collected for the purpose of research. So as a researcher I would definitely prefer to collect...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here