Marking Criteria
|
|
Section
|
HD
|
D
|
C
|
P
|
F
|
Max Mark
|
Mark
|
4
|
3.7
|
3.4
|
3.3
|
3
|
2.9
|
2.6
|
2.5
|
2
|
1.9
|
0.95
|
0
|
1. Executive summary
|
Covered all the sections of the report |
Contained all sections but not enough detail. |
Had too brief or missing sections. |
Not clear but contained most sections. |
Not clear and most sections missing. |
4
|
2. Table of contents
|
Used decimal notation. Included all headings and page numbers. Used ToC auto-generation. |
One feature was missing. |
A few features missing. |
Included only the main headings. |
ToC missing. |
4
|
3. Project Goal
|
Set the scene for the project and described the purpose clearly. |
Contained all parts but not enough detail. |
Had too brief or missing parts. |
Not clear but contained most parts. |
Not clear and most parts missing. |
4
|
4. Project Scope
|
Set the scope for the project and described the boundaries clearly. |
Contained all parts but not enough detail. |
Had too brief or missing parts. |
Not clear but contained most parts. |
Not clear and most parts missing. |
4
|
5. Design requirements
|
HD
|
D
|
C
|
P
|
F
|
1
|
0.8
|
0.7
|
0.6
|
0.4
|
0
|
a) Business Goals and Constraints
|
Thorough accurate list. |
A few inaccuracies in the list. |
One or two items missing. |
Many items missing. |
Not clear or vague description. |
1
|
b) Technical Goals and Tradeoffs
|
Thorough accurate list. |
A few inaccuracies in the list. |
One or two items missing. |
Many items missing. |
Not clear or vague description. |
1
|
c) User Communities and Network Applications
|
Thorough accurate list. |
A few inaccuracies in the list. |
One or two items missing. |
Many items missing. |
Not clear or vague description. |
1
|
d) List of Assumptions
|
Thorough accurate list. |
A few inaccuracies in the list. |
One or two items missing. |
Many items missing. |
Not clear or vague description. |
1
|
6. Logical Network Design
|
HD
|
D
|
C
|
P
|
F
|
1
|
0.8
|
0.7
|
0.6
|
0.4
|
0
|
a) Logical network diagrams including addressing and naming.
|
Covered all the information of the network. |
Contained all information but not enough detail. |
Had too brief or missing information. |
Not clear but contained most information. |
Not clear and most information missing. |
1
|
b) Explanation and justification of your logical design.
|
Covered all the information. |
Contained all information but not enough detail. |
Had too brief or missing information. |
Not clear but contained most information. |
Not clear and most information missing. |
1
|
e) List of routing and switching protocols, and security mechanisms.
|
Covered all the information. |
Contained all information but not enough detail. |
Had too brief or missing information. |
Not clear but contained most information. |
Not clear and most information missing. |
1
|
7. Physical Network Design
|
HD
|
D
|
C
|
P
|
F
|
4
|
3.7
|
3.4
|
3.3
|
3
|
2.9
|
2.6
|
2.5
|
2
|
1.9
|
0.95
|
0
|
a) Final network diagram.
|
Covered all the sections of the network. |
Contained all sections but not enough detail. |
Had too brief or missing sections. |
Not clear but contained most sections. |
Not clear and most sections missing. |
4
|
b) Table of devices, software and total cost estimation.
|
Thorough accurate list. |
A few inaccuracies in the list. |
One or two items missing. |
Many items missing. |
Not clear or vague description. |
4
|
c) The explanation and justification of b).
|
Covered all the sections of the network. |
Contained all sections but not enough detail. |
Had too brief or missing sections. |
Not clear but contained most sections. |
Not clear and most sections missing. |
4
|
d) The test plan that can be used to test the network.
|
Covered all the information of the network. |
Contained all information but not enough detail. |
Had too brief or missing information. |
Not clear but contained most information. |
Not clear and most information missing. |
4
|
e) The detailed test script for one of the tests in the test plan.
|
Covered all the information. |
Contained all information but not enough detail. |
Had too brief or missing information. |
Not clear but contained most information. |
Not clear and most information missing. |
4
|
Presentation
|
HD
|
D
|
C
|
P
|
F
|
3
|
2.75
|
2.55
|
2.5
|
2.25
|
2.2
|
1.95
|
1.9
|
1.5
|
1.45
|
0.75
|
0
|
Structure, spellings and grammar
|
Grammar and structure excellent. Minimal or no spelling errors. |
Occasional lapse in grammar but good structure. A few spelling errors. |
Grammar and/or structure should be improved. |
Frequent errors in grammar and spelling or poor structure. |
Poor writing and structure. |
3
|
Justification of successfully achieving Unit Learning Outcomes or lessons learned
|
HD
|
D
|
C
|
P
|
F
|
2
|
1.5
|
1.25
|
1
|
0.5
|
0
|
Prepare the user, business and security requirements of the organisation in relation to network design.
|
Covered all information supported by the outcomes of weekly discussion questions. |
Contained all information but not enough detail. |
Had too brief or missing information. |
Not clear but contained most information. |
Not clear and most information missing. |
2
|
Analyse the user, business and security requirements.
|
Covered all information supported by the outcomes of weekly discussion questions. |
Contained all information but not enough detail. |
Had too brief or missing information. |
Not clear but contained most information. |
Not clear and most information missing. |
2
|
Compare and contrast the possible alternative logical and physical network designs.
|
Covered all information supported by the outcomes of weekly discussion questions. |
Contained all information but not enough detail. |
Had too brief or missing information. |
Not clear but contained most information. |
Not clear and most information missing. |
2
|
Design a network by applying the top-down network design methodology.
|
Covered all information supported by the outcomes of weekly discussion questions. |
Contained all information but not enough detail. |
Had too brief or missing information. |
Not clear but contained most information. |
Not clear and most information missing. |
2
|
Create the final documentation of the designed network.
|
Covered all information supported by the outcomes of weekly discussion questions. |
Contained all information but not enough detail. |
Had too brief or missing information. |
Not clear but contained most information. |
Not clear and most information missing. |
2
|
Justify that the designed network satisfy the requirements.
|
Covered all information supported by the outcomes of weekly discussion questions. |
Contained all information but not enough detail. |
Had too brief or missing information. |
Not clear but contained most information. |
Not clear and most information missing. |
2
|
Your opinion about the unit
|
One thing you liked the most.
|
1
|
One suggestion for improvement.
|
1
|
|
Plagiarism penalty
|
|
Late submission penalty
|
|
Total
|
60
|
|