please give to Parul
CLASS: BMGT 380 PLEASE PAY SPECIAL ATTENTION TO RED WORDS AND PLEASE FOLLOW THE ATTACH RUBRIC. IT’S A VERY IMPORTANT PROJECT, LET ME KNOW IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS Purpose: The purpose of this project is to reflect on, analyze and apply tort law, agency and contract law, and their potential rights, risks and liabilities in a business. The project requires you to identify and analyze legal issues and to make recommendations. (See all links to be used as references below) You will also develop skills in critical thinking to create an in-depth comprehensive analysis. This project relates to the following course outcomes: · recommend appropriate actions in the business environment based on an understanding of sources of law, substantive legal concepts, legal process and procedure, and available remedies · analyze contractual rights, obligations, liabilities, and remedies in the business environment · analyze tort rights, obligations, liabilities, and remedies in the business environment Background: The owners of Viral Clean (Conner, Denise, Larisa, and Sam) are responsible for different components of the business. Each aspect has a legal implication. Please prepare a report that discusses the law for each aspect. For each aspect, the report must address the following: · Identify the component that is central to each of the four scenarios and explain the relevant area of the law. · As a general matter, explain why understanding the area of the law helps Clean. · Identify Clean’s rights and liabilities in the area of the law and make specific recommendations of how Clean can minimize its liabilities. Conner: Conner is responsible for purchasing PPE and cleaning supplies from EPI. Although Conner is a Clean owner, he also operates his own separate company. His company sells outerwear and athletic clothing online. While running his company, he had several instances where the manufacturer did not deliver the correct product to his company. He also had cases where the clothing did not meet the contract specifications. As a result, his company had shipping delays to the customers, and his company also shipped the wrong product to its customers. Conner wants to avoid this situation for Clean. However, if this should happen to Clean, Conner wants to understand Clean's rights as a purchaser from EPI and its liabilities as a reseller to customers. Please address the law to help Conner understand Clean’s rights and liabilities. Denise: Denise is responsible for human resources, risk-avoidance, and insurance for Clean. Denise is preparing a workers’ handbook for Clean. The handbook’s relevant sections cover workers' safety and job-related injuries to workers and Cleans’ customers. Clean’s workers include employees and independent contractors. Please address the law to help Denise prepare the relevant sections of the workers’ handbook. Larisa: Larisa is responsible for executive talent acquisition. Clean will retain the executives using three-year employment agreements. Larisa wants to ensure that the employment agreements are valid and enforceable. Larisa does not know what is required to ensure that the employment agreements are valid and enforceable. Please address the law that will assist Larisa. Sam: Sam is responsible for government compliance and product development. Sam ensures that all PPE and cleaning solutions meet the Center for Disease Control’s guidelines. Sam also monitors the laws in the states where Clean’s PPE and cleaning solution are sold. He ensures that the states are not planning to ban any of the cleaning solution’s ingredients. Please address the law that will assist Sam when states plan to ban the cleaning solution’s ingredients. Instructions There will be 1 single report with subheadings for each Clean employee; Conner, Denise, Larisa. and Sam. Each subheading should include the following: · Identify the component that is central to each of the four scenarios and explain the relevant area of the law. · As a general matter, explain why understanding the area of the law helps Clean. · Identify Clean’s rights and liabilities in the area of the law and make specific recommendations of how Clean can minimize its liabilities. No narrative minimum is provided. Be sure to cover each component thoroughly, demonstrating your understanding and application of the law. Format Report TO: Winnie James, Ralph Anders FROM: (your name) RE: Clean risks and liabilities A brief introduction of the purpose of the report A. Conner (1) (2) (3) B. Denise (1) (2) (3) C. Larisa (1) (2) (3) D. Sam (1) (2) (3) ______________________ Tips for Formatting and Structuring Analysis: · Write in complete sentences in paragraph format. · Use in-text citations citing to relevant assignment materials. · Double-space; 12-point Arial or Times Roman font. · Introductory Sentence: Begin with an introductory sentence or very brief paragraph that states the purpose of this report. · Concluding Sentence: End the discussion with a concluding sentence or a very brief paragraph that summarizes your conclusion/what you discussed. · Support Arguments and Positions: Please refer to the module in Content, "How to Support Arguments and Positions.". A References page may be added at the end of the report. Review the Project Memorandum Thoroughly read the project to ensure all required elements are present. Review the grading rubric to ensure that you gain the most points possible for this assignment. Proofread for spelling and grammatical issues. References to be used for this project https://saylordotorg.github.io/text_advanced-business-law-and-the-legal-environment/s10-introduction-to-tort-law.html https://saylordotorg.github.io/text_business-law-and-the-legal-environment-v1.0-a/s11-introduction-to-contract-law.html https://www.britannica.com/topic/agency-law https://saylordotorg.github.io/text_law-for-entrepreneurs/s20-products-liability https://www.lawteacher.net/free-law-e ssays/contract-law/exploring-warranties-and-product-liability-contract-law-essay.php 7/4/22, 11:51 AM Rubric Assessment - BMGT 380 6381 Business Law I (2225) - UMGC Learning Management System https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=683198&evalObjectId=1281211&evalObjectType=1&userId=3… 1/7 BMGT 380 Rubric for Project 2 (100) - Spring 2022 Course: BMGT 380 6381 Business Law I (2225) Criteria Outstanding Above Standards Meets Standards Approached Standards Does Not Meet Standards Criterion Score 7/4/22, 11:51 AM Rubric Assessment - BMGT 380 6381 Business Law I (2225) - UMGC Learning Management System https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=683198&evalObjectId=1281211&evalObjectType=1&userId=3… 2/7 Criteria Outstanding Above Standards Meets Standards Approached Standards Does Not Meet Standards Criterion Score Critical Thinking/R easoning / 50 Support for Conclusion s / 20 50 points Outstanding analysis, synthesis, evaluation and application of relevant legal concepts, and application of law to facts. Accurate, thorough, and soundly reasoned, well- supported conclusions. Range:45 - 50 44 points Superior analysis, synthesis, evaluation and application of relevant legal concepts, and application of law to facts. Reasonably accurate, thorough, well- reasoned and well- supported conclusions. Could be more in- depth, more comprehensi ve in analysis. Range: 40 - 44 39 points Satisfactory analysis, synthesis, evaluation and application of relevant legal concepts, and application to facts. Partially correct conclusions that lack depth, development and/or detail, and complete, specific support for conclusions. Range: 35 - 39 34 points Unsatisfacto ry analysis, synthesis, evaluation and application of relevant legal concepts, and application to facts. Conclusions are underdevelo ped and/or lack complete, specific support. Range:30 - 34 0 points Does not meet minimum requirement s for projects. Largely unsatisfactor y analysis, synthesis, evaluation and application of relevant legal concepts to facts. Little to no logical conclusions, little to no support for conclusions. OR does not submit assignment. Range: 0 - 29 20 points Exceptionall y well- supported 17.5 points Excellent generally well- 15.5 points Mostly well- supported arguments 13.5 points Arguments and conclusions 0 points Does not meet minimum 7/4/22, 11:51 AM Rubric Assessment - BMGT 380 6381 Business Law I (2225) - UMGC Learning Management System https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=683198&evalObjectId=1281211&evalObjectType=1&userId=3… 3/7 Criteria Outstanding Above Standards Meets Standards Approached Standards Does Not Meet Standards Criterion Score arguments and conclusions with evidence from assigned materials and readings; may include support for some conclusions based on relevant specific examples or experience. Ideas and conclusions go beyond the basic course materials and recognize implications and extensions of the material and concepts. Range: 18 - 20 supported arguments and conclusions mostly supported by evidence from assigned materials with perhaps some conclusions based on relevant specific examples or experience. Ideas and conclusions general demonstrate understandi ng of the material and concepts. Range:16 - 17.5 and conclusions based on evidence from assigned materials. A mix of opinion and/or unclear conclusions lacking adequate support and/or unsupported arguments and conclusions. Range:14 - 15.5 are frequently illogical and unsubstantia ted. Limited use of legal concepts and assigned materials to support conclusions. Range:12 - 13.5 requirement s for project. Arguments and conclusions lack meaningful explanation or support of ideas. OR does not submit assignment. Range:0 -11.5 7/4/22, 11:51 AM Rubric Assessment - BMGT 380 6381 Business Law I (2225) - UMGC Learning Management System https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=683198&evalObjectId=1281211&evalObjectType=1&userId=3… 4/7 Criteria Outstanding Above Standards Meets Standards Approached Standards Does Not Meet Standards Criterion Score Project Presentatio n / 1515 points Shows exceptional clarity, creativity, excellent quality, com pleteness, skill and professionali sm in presentation . Presentation demonstrate s high level of critical thinking, understandi ng of concepts, issues, and their application to facts. Range:13.5 - 15 13 points Generally, presentation shows superior clarity, creativity, superior quality, completenes s, skill and professionali sm in presentation . Presentation demonstrate s superior level of critical thinking, with general understandi ng of concepts, issues, and their application to facts. Range:12.0 - 13.0 11.5 points Presentation shows average clarity, creativity, completenes s, completenes s, skill and professionali sm in presentation . Presentation demonstrate s some critical thinking, some general understandi ng of concepts, issues, and their application to facts, but needs further depth, development . Range:10.5 - 11.5 10 points Presentation is of poor quality, lacks clarity, and/or creativity, and/or completenes s, and/or skill and/or professionali sm. Presentation demonstrate s little to no critical thinking, and/or understandi ng of concepts, issues, and their application to facts. Range:9.0 - 10.0 0 points Fails to meet minimal requirement s for project. OR does not submit assignment. Range: 0 - 8. 7/4/22, 11:51 AM Rubric Assessment - BMGT 380 6381 Business Law I (2225) - UMGC Learning Management System https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=683198&evalObjectId=1281211&evalObjectType=1&userId=3… 5/7 Criteria Outstanding Above Standards Meets Standards Approached Standards Does Not Meet Standards Criterion Score Attention to Instruction s / 55 points Demonstrate s exceptional understandi ng of requirement s responding completely to each aspect of assignment, including minor aspects of the assignment such as using third person writing, required use of assigned materials, and assignment format. Range:4.5 - 5.0 4.4 points Demonstrate s superior understandi ng of requirement s; missed one or more minor aspects of assignment. Range:4.0 - 4.4 3.9 points Demonstrate s satisfactory understandi ng of requirement s; missed more than one key element and/or more than two minor aspects of assignment. Range:3.5 - 3.9 3.4 points Fails to show a firm understandi ng of requirement s; missed more than two key elements and/or numerous minor aspects of assignment