Answer To: Assessment item 2 back to top Research Report task Value: 15% Due Date: 24-Aug-2018 Return...
Kuldeep answered on Aug 10 2020
Running head: Cyber Crime
Cyber Crime
Cyber Crime
Student Name:
Student ID:
Subject Code:
Subject Name:
Session and Assessment number:
Contents
Part A: 3
What the problem was; 3
How and why it occurred; 4
What could have been done to prevent it? 5
Part B 6
What the problem was; 6
The scope of the attack; 7
Operational details of the attack; 7
What could have been done to prevent the attack? 8
References 10
Part A:
What the problem was;
At least 87 million records breached (though likely many more)
Date disclosed: March 17, 2018
Who can disremember about the data outrage that Facebook shocked in March 2018? There were reports at that time that political data company named Cambridge Analytica collects the personal information of about fifty million of Facebook users through an application setting out the personality, social networking and participation on platform. Although Cambridge Analytica claims that it has merely 30 million users, Facebook has determined that the initial estimation was actually very low (Frenkel & Roose, 2018). In April, the corporation announced its 87 million followers that their information was shared. Unfortunately, as the Facebook app gets a more accurate overview, Cambridge Analytica outrage can only be the tip of an iceberg. On 27 June, security researcher Inti De Ceukelaire announced another application known as Nametests.com which revealed information from more than 120 million users (Houser & Voss, 2018).
The problem began in March when the $ 500 billion company previously recognized that the investigation company Cambridge Analytica, closely related to President Trump's campaign and legal companies, uses data collected by millions of users lacking their permission (Kowolenko&Vouk, 2018).
Facebook is still criticized by investors and commentators, as stock prices decline - the company's market value fell only by $ 50 billion in the first week. The scandal has been exposed as the biggest two-day decline in history. At the same time, lawmakers in the United States and the UK asked Zuckerberg to explain how his company's approach could get answers in the testimony next week.
How and why it occurred;
Last weekend, it was revealed that Cambridge Analytics had illegally collected personal data on 50 million Facebook profiles. It all began in year 2015 when Cambridge psychology lecturer named Alexander Cogan formed an app named "This is your digital life." The app is personality test, defined by Dr. Kogan as "a research application utilized by psychologists."
His company, Global Science Research, and Cambridge Analytica reached an agreement to share this information. About 270,000 Facebook users signed up and received a reward for a personality test that could be stored by the company. But things here are getting riskier: the app also collects information about the user's Facebook friends, and unless they have already signed up for the app, they don't agree to store their private information. This was revealed by Christopher Wylie, a reporter and analyst who worked with Cambridge Analytica. "We used the Facebook to gatherprofiles of millions of people." and develop models to take benefit of our understanding of them and direct their internal demons. This is a foundation for the whole company. "The program depends on the consent of its users on behalf of all friends - or at least those whose privacy settings allow to share with friends' programs - to receive more limited information (Graham-Harrison & Cadwalladr, 2018)". It is reported that this information is used to determine the 2016 pre-election Voter behavior, and the Brexit campaign in the early years of the year. The report shows that more than 50 million people have harvested data without permission.
Facebook faces the pressure to be more transparent about how third-party companies may or may use their user data. Critics say the scandal highlights its continuing problems to understand how others are dealing with its platform. According to reports, since 2015, the social media giant has known that this information has been harvested, but has not taken any measures to protect its users. The network tried to imply that it was deceived, and those participants should not lie about deleting the data. In a series of tweets that have been deleted, Facebook's chief officer, Alex...