Chapter 3 4 5 are to be known for the exam. It starts at 4 pm NYC time and ends at 6:30. I will therefore need someone to do the exam on the spot in two hours.
IEOR 4706 : Final (April 10, 12 pm – April 11, 12 pm) Name : SID : 1 Exercice 1: Super–replication under interest rate and volatility uncertainty We consider a one–period binomial, that is to say we work on the space Ω := {ωu, ωd}, which we endow with the σ−algebra F := {∅,Ω, {ωu}, {ωd}}. The filtration considered is F := (F0,F1), with F0 := {∅,Ω}, and F1 := F . The market contains one risky asset whose price evolves as follows S0 dS0 P[{ω d}] = 1− p uS0 P[{ω u}] = p where p ∈ (0, 1) and 0 < d="">< u.="" there="" is="" also="" one="" non–risky="" asset,="" whose="" price="" at="" time="" t="" is="" given="" by="" s0t="" :="(1" +="" r)t,="" t="0," 1.="" however,="" unlike="" the="" model="" considered="" in="" the="" lectures,="" we="" assume="" that="" the="" true="" values="" of="" the="" parameters="" r,="" u="" and="" d="" are="" not="" known="" perfectly,="" and="" that="" the="" only="" information="" that="" we="" have="" is="" that="" they="" lie="" in="" intervals="" with="" known="" bounds.="" more="" precisely,="" we="" have="" 0="" ≤="" r="" ≤="" r="" ≤="" r,="" 0="">< u="" ≤="" u="" ≤="" u,="" and="" 0="">< d="" ≤="" d="" ≤="" d,="" where="" the="" bounds="" are="" known="" explicitly.="" we="" moreover="" assume="" that="" u=""> d. To take this uncertainty into account, we consider a family of probability measures on (Ω,F), denoted by P, such that P := { P : ∃(r, d, u) ∈ [r, r]× [d, d]× [u, u], P [ {S1 = uS0} ] = p, P [ {S1 = dS0} ] = 1− p, P [ {S01 = 1 + r}] = 1 } . Every P ∈ P thus represents one possible binomial model with parameters (r, d, u) ∈ [r, r]× [d, d]× [u, u]. 1) Prove that if d < 1="" +="" r,="" and="" 1="" +="" r="">< u,="" then="" we="" have="" that="" for="" any="" p="" ∈="" p,="" the="" usual="" condition="" (na)="" holds="" under="" the="" measure="" p.1="" we="" will="" assume="" that="" these="" inequalities="" hold="" throughout="" the="" rest="" of="" the="" exercise.="" 2)="" let="" us="" consider="" an="" option="" with="" payoff="" h(s1).="" our="" goal="" will="" be="" to="" compute="" its="" super–replication="" price,="" defined="" in="" this="" context="" by="" p="" (="" h(s1)="" )="" :="inf" {="" x="" ∈="" r="" :="" ∃∆="" ∈="" r,p="" [{="" xx,∆1="" ≥="" h(s1)="" }]="1," ∀p="" ∈="" p="" }="" .="" show="" that="" if="" the="" self–financing="" portfolio="" xx,∆="" super–replicates="" the="" option,="" then="" we="" necessarily="" have="" that="" for="" any="" (r,="" d,="" u)="" ∈="" [r,="" r]×="" [d,="" d]×="" [u,="" u]="" {="" ∆us0="" +="" (1="" +="" r)(x−∆s0)="" ≥="" h(us0),="" ∆ds0="" +="" (1="" +="" r)(x−∆s0)="" ≥="" h(ds0).="" 3)="" deduce="" that="" if="" the="" self–financing="" portfolio="" xx,∆="" super–replicates="" the="" option,="" then="" we="" necessarily="" have="" that="" for="" any="" (r,="" d,="" u)="" ∈="" [r,="" r]×="" [d,="" d]×="" [u,="" u]="" h(us0)−="" (1="" +="" r)x="" s0(u−="" 1−="" r)="" ≤="" ∆="" ≤="" (1="" +="" r)x−="" h(ds0)="" s0(1="" +="" r="" −="" d)="" ,="" and="" then="" that="" x="" ≥="" max="" (r,d,u)∈[r,r]×[d,d]×[u,u]="" f(r,="" d,="" u),="" where="" we="" defined="" f(r,="" d,="" u)="" :="11" +="" r="" (="" 1="" +="" r="" −="" d="" u−="" d="" h(us0)="" +="" u−="" 1−="" r="" u−="" d="" h(ds0)="" )="" .="" 1we="" recall="" that="" condition="" (na)="" under="" p="" stipulates="" that="" for="" any="" ∆="" ∈="" r,="" p[x0,∆1="" ≥="" 0]="1" =⇒="" p[x="" 0,∆="" 1="0]" =="" 1.="" 2="" 4)="" prove="" that="" for="" any="" (d,="" u)="" ∈="" [d,="" d]×="" [u,="" u]="" max="" r∈[r,r]="" f(r,="" d,="" u)="{" f(r,="" d,="" u),="" if="" dh(us0)="" ≥="" uh(ds0),="" f(r,="" d,="" u),="" if="" dh(us0)="">< uh(ds0).="" we="" denote="" the="" corresponding="" point="" where="" the="" maximum="" is="" attained="" by="" r?(d,="" u),="" with="" r?(d,="" u)="" :="{" r,="" if="" dh(us0)="" ≥="" uh(ds0),="" r,="" if="" dh(us0)="">< uh(ds0).="" 5)(?)="" assume="" now="" that="" there="" exists="" a="" pair="" (u?,="" d?)="" ∈="" [u,="" u]×="" [d,="" d]="" such="" that="" x="f" (="" r?(d?,="" u?),="" d?,="" u?="" )="" .="" prove="" that="" the="" strategy="" with="" initial="" capital="" x="" and="" with="" a="" number="" of="" risky="" assets="" held="" at="" time="" 0="" given="" by="" ∆="" :="h(u" s0)−="" h(d?s0)="" (u?="" −="" d?)s0="" ,="" super–replicates="" the="" option.="" 6)="" conclude="" that="" p="" (="" h(s1)="" )="x." 7)="" for="" any="" probability="" measure="" pr,d,u="" ∈="" p="" associated="" to="" some="" given="" (r,="" d,="" u)="" ∈="" [r,="" r]×="" [d,="" d]×="" [u,="" u],="" we="" can="" associate="" an="" equivalent="" probability="" measure="" qr,d,u="" such="" that="" qr,d,u[{ωu}]="1−Qr,d,u[{ωd}]" :="1" +="" r="" −="" d="" u−="" d="" .="" check,="" and="" comment,="" that="" for="" any="" (r,="" d,="" u)="" ∈="" [r,="" r]="" ×="" [d,="" d]="" ×="" [u,="" u],="" we="" have="" that="" (st/(1="" +="" r))t="0,1" is="" an="" (f,qr,d,u)–="" martingale,="" and="" that="" the="" following="" super–hedging="" duality="" holds="" p="" (="" h(s1)="" )="max" (r,d,u)∈[r,r]×[d,d]×[u,u]="" eqr,d,u="" [="" h(s1)="" 1="" +="" r="" ]="" .="" 8)(?)="" compute="" explicitly="" p="" (="" h(s1)="" )="" when="" h="" is="" the="" payoff="" of="" a="" call="" option="" with="" maturity="" 1="" and="" strike="" k=""> 0, that is to say h(S1) = (S1 −K)+. Exercise 2: Asian option in Black–Scholes model We consider the one–dimensional Black–Scholes model seen in class, with time horizon T > 0, such that the unique risky asset in the market has the following dynamics under the unique risk–neutral measure Q St = S0 + ∫ t 0 rSsds+ ∫ t 0 σSsdBQs , t ∈ [0, T ], where r ≥ 0 is the interest–rate, σ > 0 the volatility of S, S0 > 0 its initial value, and BQ is a Q–Brownian motion. The goal of the exercise is to evaluate the price of an Asian Call option on S, with maturity T and strike K > 0, whose payoff at maturity is given by ΦT := ( 1 T ∫ T 0 Ssds−K )+ . We denote by ACt(T,K;S) the value at any time t ∈ [0, T ] of such an option, and as usual, by Ct(T,K;S) the value at time t ∈ [0, T ] of the call option with strike K, maturity T and underlying S. 1) Consider another option with maturity T , whose payoff is defined by ΨT := ( exp ( 1 T ∫ T 0 log(Ss)ds ) −K )+ The value at any time t ∈ [0, T ] of the option with payoff ΨT is denoted by GACt(T,K;S). 3 a) Prove that ΦT = ( 1 T ∫ T 0 ( Ss −K ) ds )+ , and then that ΦT ≤ 1 T ∫ T 0 ( Ss −K )+ds. b) Prove that exp ( 1 T ∫ T 0 log(Ss)ds ) ≤ 1 T ∫ T 0 Ssds, and deduce that ΨT ≤ ΦT . Hint: It would be profitable to admit the so–called Jensen’s inequality, which states that for any convex function f : R −→ R, and any integrable function g : [0, T ] −→ R, we have f ( 1 T ∫ T 0 g(s)ds ) ≤ 1 T ∫ T 0 f ( g(s) ) ds. c) Deduce then that GAC0(T,K;S) ≤ AC0(T,K;S) ≤ 1 T ∫ T 0 e−r(T−s)C0(u,K;S)du. 2)a) Show that ∫ T 0 BQs ds = ∫ T 0 (T − s)dBQs . 2)b) Deduce that the random variable 1/T ∫ T 0 log(Ss)ds has a Gaussian distribution under Q, with mean m and variance v2, where m = log(S0) + ( r − σ 2 2 ) T 2 , v 2 := σ 2T 3 . 2)c) Show then (this should remind you of Black–Scholes formula) that GAC0(T,K;S) = S0e− T 2 (r+ σ2 6 )N (d1)−Ke−rTN (d0), where d0 := 1 σ √ T/3 log ( S0e T 2 (r− σ2 2 ) K ) , d1 := d0 + v. 3) We now define a new process Yt = Y0 + ∫ t 0 Sudu, t ∈ [0, T ], where Y0 > 0 is a given constant. a) Prove that the pair (S, Y ) is a Markovian diffusion, that is to say that you can find maps b : (0,+∞)2 −→ R2 and Σ : (0,+∞)2 −→ R2×2 (where R2×2 is the set of 2× 2 matrices) such that( St Yt ) = ( S0 Y0 ) + ∫ t 0 b(Ss, Ys)ds+ ∫ t 0 Σ(Ss, Ys) ( dBQs dBQs ) , t ∈ [0, T ]. b) We consider an option with maturity T and payoff (1/TYT −K)+. We are looking for a self–financing portfolio Xx,∆ which replicates this option and takes a very specific form, namely Xx,∆t = u(t, St, Yt), t ∈ [0, T ], 4 where the map u : [0, T ]×(0,+∞)2 −→ R is supposed to be as smooth as necessary. Using the two–dimensional Itō’s formula (see Footnote 2 in the next exercise), show that necessarily, the map u must then satisfy the PDE ∂u ∂t (t, x, y) + rx∂u ∂x (t, x, y) + x∂u ∂y (t, x, y) + σ 2 2 x 2 ∂ 2u ∂x2 (t, x, y)− ru(t, x, y) = 0, (t, x, y) ∈ [0, T )× (0,+∞)2, u(T, x, y) = ( y T −K )+ , (x, y) ∈ (0,+∞)2. We will assume that this PDE has a unique non–negative solution with bounded derivatives with respect to x and y. c) Deduce a replicating strategy for the option with payoff ΦT , and prove as well that AC0(T,K;S) = u(0, S0, 0). 4) The PDE derived in the previous question is not easy to deal with numerically, so we will try to reduce its dimension. a)(?) Prove that an option with maturity T and payoff 1/T ∫ T 0 Ssds−K can be replicated by a self–financing portfolio (x?,∆?), where x? := S0 1− e−rT rT −Ke−rT , ∆?t := 1− e−r(T−t) rT , t ∈ [0, T ]. b) We define Zt := Xx ?,∆? t S −1 t , t ∈ [0, T ]. Show that dZt = ( ∆?t − Zt ) σ ( dBQt − σdt ) . c) Let us consider the probability measure QS whose density with respect to Q is given by dQS dQ := e −rT ST S0 . Show that QS is well–defined, that the process BS , defined by BSt := B Q t − σt, t ∈ [0, T ], is a QS–Brownian motion, and deduce that Z is a QS–martingale. d) Show that AC0(T,K;S) = S0EQ S [Z+T ], and deduce then that AC0(T,K;S) =