Case
The Andersons Tackle Their Tax Return
Noah and Olivia Anderson are a married couple in their early 20s living in Dallas. Noah Anderson earned
73,000 in 2014 from his sales job. During the year, his employer withheld
9,172 for income tax purposes. In addition, the Andersons received interest of
350 on a joint savings account, $750 interest on tax-exempt municipal bonds, and dividends of
400 on common stocks. At the end of 2014, the Andersons sold two stocks, A and B. Stock A was sold for
700 and had been purchased four months earlier for $800. Stock B was sold for
1,500 and had been purchased three years earlier for
1,100. Their only child, Logan, age 2, received (as his sole source of income) dividends of
200 from Hershey stock. Although Noah is covered by his company’s pension plan, he plans to contribute
5,000 to a traditional deductible IRA for 2014. Here are the amounts of money paid out during the year by the Andersons:
Medical and dental expenses (unreimbursed)
200
State and local property taxes 831
Interest paid on home mortgage 4,148
Charitable contributions 1,360
Total
6,539
In addition, Noah incurred some unreimbursed travel costs for an out-of-town business trip:
Airline ticket
250
Taxis 20
Lodging 60
Meals (as adjusted to 50 percent of cost) 36
Total
366
Critical Thinking Questions
1. Using the Andersons’ information, determine the total amount of their itemized deductions. Assume that they’ll use the filing status of married filing jointly, the standard deduction for that status is $12,400, and each exemption claimed is worth $3,950. Should they itemize or take the standard deduction? Prepare a joint tax return for Noah and Olivia Anderson for the year ended December 31, 2014, that gives them the smallest tax liability. Use the appropriate tax rate schedule provided in Exhibit 3.3 to calculate their taxes owed.
2. How much have you saved the Andersons through your treatment of their deductions?
3. Discuss whether the Andersons need to file a tax return for their son.
4. Suggest some tax strategies that the Andersons might use to reduce their tax liability for next year.