Case study: The Mitchell family Jennifer Mitchell, aged 43 years, lives with her two children, Thomas (13 years) and Amelia (six years). They live in a private rental property in a suburb of a major...

1 answer below »


Case study: The Mitchell family



Jennifer Mitchell, aged 43 years, lives with her two children, Thomas (13 years) and Amelia (six years). They live in a private rental property in a suburb of a major city.



Jennifer migrated to Australia from England in her twenties. She met Mark, Thomas and Amelia’s father, a few years later. Three years ago, Mark was made redundant, so accepted some casual work interstate. He was away from home for long periods, and when he returned, Jennifer and Mark argued a lot. They separated 12 months ago. Mark now lives interstate and visits Thomas and Amelia occasionally.



Jennifer is the primary caregiver for Thomas and Amelia and hadn’t been in paid employment since Thomas was born. After she separated from Mark, and Amelia started school, she returned to work as a childcare worker.



Six months ago, Jennifer was involved in a major motor vehicle accident while driving to work. She was in hospital for two months. Thomas and Amelia mostly stayed with Jennifer’s friends during this time. Jennifer has an acquired brain injury and is not able to work or drive. Since the separation and her accident, Jennifer has experienced periods of moderate depression.



Since Jennifer only returned to work for a short period, she doesn’t have significant savings or income protection. Jennifer is receiving some financial support via Centrelink. The hospital social worker helped Jennifer to register with the National Disability Insurance Scheme and she is on a waiting list to determine whether she is eligible to receive funding.



Their landlord has informed Jennifer that the lease will not be renewed, as they wish to sell the property. The lease ends in one month. There are limited private rental properties in the area and rent has increased significantly in the last few years. With help from her friends, Jennifer has applied for a few rental properties, but the applications have been unsuccessful since she’s not currently employed. Jennifer went to Housing SA but was told that there is a ten-year waiting period. Jennifer is hesitant to move away from her friends and her doctor. She doesn’t know where they will live when the lease ends.



Thomas has recently started high school. He has been busy caring for his Mum and Amelia. He does much of the cooking and cleaning. He is often tired at school and has trouble concentrating. His teachers are concerned that he’s falling behind.



Since the accident, going to school has become very distressing for Amelia. When Jennifer’s friend picks Amelia up in the mornings, she becomes very upset, and screams and cries for hours. Jennifer often allows her to stay home. At times Amelia is inseparable from her Mum. At other times, she plays alone in her room for hours. Amelia says that she misses her Dad.


·
Task overview:


1. Choose one problem solving theory, i.e. task centred practice OR crisis intervention


1. Describe the main arguments of the theory (approx. 200 words)


2. Explain why you selected that specific theory; why it is helpful in understanding the case study? (approx. 100 words)


3. Analyse the case study from the perspective of the theory


1. Select and apply two key principles to aspects of the case study; how do they inform your understanding of the case study? How would they shape your practice? (approx. 250 words per principle)


2. Choose one psychological theory, i.e. cognitive behavioural therapy OR attachment


1. Describe the main arguments of the theory (approx. 200 words)


2. Explain why you selected that specific theory; why it is helpful in understanding the case study? (approx. 100 words)


3. Analyse the case study from the perspective of the theory


1. Select and apply two key principles to aspects of the case study; how do they inform your understanding of the case study? How would they shape your practice? (approx. 250 words per principle)


3. Draw an eco-map and genogram that represent the case study


4. Apply the principle ofstressto the case study, and explain why systems theory is helpful in understanding the case study (approx. 300 words)


Please use sub-headings and include a brief introduction and conclusion (i.e. 50 words each).


The word limit is 2000 words. 10% variance is allowed.


It is acceptable to write in first person and use personal pronouns such as "I" or "my" in this assessment.


This assessment must be supported by at least 10 academic references. You will need to use topic materials and undertake wider research.
APA referencing
conventions must be used.


Please see the Marking rubric below for more information on the assessment criteria.



Assessment 2: Case study 2, 50%, 2000 words, due Wednesday 9 June 2021, 10:00 am


Learning outcomes to be assessed:


· Develop and articulate a comprehensive framework for understanding theories that inform professional social work practice


· Select appropriate theoretical knowledge to support future practice skills which aids effective involvement within various client systems, i.e. individuals, families, small groups and communities


· Utilise theoretical frameworks for reflection and analysis to form a beginning understanding about one’s own professional practice


This assessment will assess your learning from Weeks 7-12. The purpose of the assessment is todemonstrate your understanding of social work theories, select key theoretical principles and apply theseto the above case study. You will begin to develop a framework for understanding social work theories and reflecting on your professional identity.



Task overview:


4. Choose one of empowerment, anti-oppressive practice OR feminism


1. Describe the main arguments of the theory (approx. 200 words)


2. Explain why you selected that specific theory; why it is helpful in understanding the case study? (approx. 100 words)


3. Analyse the case study from the perspective of the theory


1. Select and apply two key principles to aspects of the case study; how do they inform your understanding of the case study? How would they shape your practice? (approx. 200 words per principle)


5. Choose one of post-structuralism OR strengths perspective


1. Describe the main arguments of the theory (approx. 200 words)


2. Explain why you selected that specific theory; why it is helpful in understanding the case study? (approx. 100 words)


3. Analyse the case study from the perspective of the theory


1. Select and apply two key principles to aspects of the case study; how do they inform your understanding of the case study? How would they shape your practice? (approx. 200 words per principle)


6. Reflect on the theories you have applied to the case study throughout this topic. How were they similar or different? What do they focus on/not focus on, and what are the strengths/limitations of this? Which theories do you think you will use in your own professional practice and why? (approx. 150 words)


7. Reflect on the historical and geographical context within which these theories were developed. Do social work theories privilege some ways of knowing over others? How can Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples' ways of knowing, being and doing influence social work practice? (approx. 350 words)


Please use sub-headings and include a brief introduction and conclusion (i.e. 50 words each).


The word limit is 2000 words. 10% variance is allowed.


It is acceptable to write in first person and use personal pronouns such as "I" or "my" in this assessment.


This assessment must be supported by at least 10 academic references. You will need to use topic materials and undertake wider research.APA referencingconventions must be used.


Answered 1 days AfterJun 09, 2021

Answer To: Case study: The Mitchell family Jennifer Mitchell, aged 43 years, lives with her two children,...

Taruna answered on Jun 10 2021
149 Votes
Running Head: CRITICAL APPRAISAL PAPER         1
CRITICAL APPRAISAL PAPER        2
THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVES AND SOCIAL WORK PRACTICES: CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF THE PROVIDED CASE STUDY
Table of Contents
Introduction    3
Main arguments of Theory: Anti-Oppressive Practice    3
Rationale for Selection    3
Key Principles of Anti-Oppressive Practice and their Application    4
Main Arguments of the Theory: Post-Structuralism    5
Rationale for Selection    6
Key Principles of Post-Structu
ralism and their Application    6
Reflection on the Theories    7
Implications on Social Work Theories    8
Conclusion    9
References    9
Introduction
    With expansion of communities into global context, the criteria of social work practices have been expanded critically; there are multiple levels of understanding the needs and expectations of the marginalized communities who especially migrate from one part of the world to the other. The following is the application of the anti-oppressive practice and post-structuralism to the provided case study of Jenifer Mitchell, a migrant from England to Australia.
Main arguments of Theory: Anti-Oppressive Practice
    In the context of the case study of Jennifer, what seems to be the most dominant factor is the lack of support and this is the standpoint of anti-oppressive practices and it leads to some positive interventions. The theory works on the grounds of support against any kind of oppression that individual from marginalized communities encounter. The functional nature of the theory is multidisciplinary in social work practices. It examines the degree of coordination that the social support groups need to have with regard to approach the issue and ensure that it is resolved. The theory works on the socio-economic alleviation of the diverse population living in nation, especially the migrant ones.
    Additionally, the theory projects various kinds of oppressions which are directly or indirectly dominant. They can range from social to economic factors and lead to create potential barriers for the individuals. When there is no liberation of living permitted, individuals suffer on many things and economic stability is one of them. Migrant people in particular need employment and economic security, which they do not get in proper social context. The theory argues that covering of the all kinds of oppressive practices is the core component to eliminate poverty and vulnerability of populations.
Rationale for Selection
    Anti-oppressive practice is selected for the given case study of Jenifer because the first step in the process of assistance served to her is to recognize the basic needs that she expects from the system. She is completely out of resources that she can utilize to take care of her family. Thus, there are indirect methods of oppression applied on her due to the conventional approach of the system. Her needs are mainly based on the economic support and social security, which can be granted to her through eradicating the oppressive factors from her life.
Key Principles of Anti-Oppressive Practice and their Application
    There are two key principles of the anti-oppressive practice theory and they both are applicable on Jenifer. At first, the theory identifies the level of vulnerability of the individual, which has affected her physical and mental condition. For Jenifer, employment and social security of living are the two oppressive factors working negatively on her. She has already shown potential signs of depression due to the lack of approach in society. She is out of employment and she mainly depends on her local friends to support her on financial and family grounds. Her husband has left her around one year back and since then; she is the single parent to two children. Thus, employment based vulnerability is the first oppressive factor, which is breaking her morale at present. The impacts of the same can be seen in the behavioural approach of her children. Her son, Thomas, is taking care of the family after her accident and it is affecting his academic career. Amelia, her daughter, is becoming emotionally sensitive as she is at times inseparable from her mother. The whole family is on the verge of breaking down at social and economic level and it makes the family appear as highly vulnerable, demanding support and coordination of the social agencies.
    In the same context, the second principle of the theory is linked with the perception that dynamism of change exists in all social spheres; this dynamism can be put to make positive interventions on behalf of the social workers. The social disparities, differences and even geographic location of the diverse populations...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here