Case: Arizona v. UnitedStates, 567 U.S. ___ (2012), was a United States Supreme Court case involvingArizona's Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act. At issue iswhether the law...

1 answer below »


Case:Arizona v. United States, 567 U.S. ___ (2012), was a United States Supreme Court case involving Arizona's Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act. At issue is whether the law usurps the federal government's authority to regulate immigration laws and enforcement. The Court ruled that sections 3, 5(C), and 6 of S. B. 1070 are preempted by federal law.


On April 23, 2010, Arizona Governor Jan Brewer signed into law SB 1070, or the "Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act".[1] The act made it a state misdemeanor crime for an illegal immigrant to be in Arizona without carrying registration documents required by federal law, authorizes state and local law enforcement of federal immigration laws, and cracks down on those sheltering, hiring and transporting illegal immigrants.[2]The bill's passage immediately sparked concerns over potential civil rights violations and have accused it of encouraging racial profiling.



Summarize the case in a 1,400- to 2,100-word written analysis in
which you explain the implications it has regarding social policy in the area of public safety. How does your selected case apply to individual privacy rights and laws relating to those rights? Explain.


Debate the following areas in your analysis:


·Laws relating to search and seizure


·Laws relating to surveillance by police


·Laws relating to surveillance by school officials


·Laws relating to surveillance by security personnel


Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.


I also need a reference page

Answered Same DayDec 20, 2021

Answer To: Case: Arizona v. UnitedStates, 567 U.S. ___ (2012), was a United States Supreme Court case...

David answered on Dec 20 2021
122 Votes
ARIZONA VS UNITED STATES
S.B.1070 known as an Arizona Statue was established in the year 2010. This act addresses issues pertained to pressing, to a huge number of aliens stepped into the state unlawfully. It was sought by the United States to command the law as pre-empted. The court at the
district level had issued an initial injunction with regard to four of its provisions. As per section 3, a state misdemeanor fails to meet the requirements for federal alien – registration. As per section 5, a misdemeanour is an unauthorized alien to get engaged in / seek the work. Section 6 ("Section 6," ), indicates that an officer in the local or state level has the right to arrest a person without a warrant with a view that the person has committed a public offense, which makes the person to remove from the country I,e United States of America. As per Section 2(B) , every officer has a right conducting a detention ,stop or arrest in many of the circumstances in order to comply the immigration status with the Federal Government. It has been ensured that as per the ninth circuit, that United States had successfully implemented pre-emption claims. The Federal Government’s power unprecedented power on alien and immigration status is part of its constitutional power in order to establish a rule in terms of Naturalization ("Arizona et al.,"). We may be of the opinion that federal government Federal Governance is vibrant and complicated to understand. The law mentions that categories of alien who are not eligible to be settled in United States. All the aliens need to register with federal government and carry a proof of the same to show the status. There have been instances, where have been sanctions in the employers who hire workers that are unauthorized in nature.
In order to address the pressing issues pertained to huge number of aliens in the borders of State of Arizona during the year 2010, who did not have legal rights in order to establish in the country – United States OF America. In order to address this issue, a statue named “Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighbourhoods Act” was enacted during the year 2010. The law was specifically enacted in order to discourage aliens and unauthorised persons entering United States for economic activity. The Supreme Court of United States had addressed the question, whether federal law pre-empts and renders four separate provisions of the state law.
A suit had been filed by United States against Arizona, seeking to enjoin S.B.1070 as pre-empted. The earlier four provision of law are enumerated here. There were two new state offenses were created. As per Section 3, it fails meeting the federal alien-registration requirements, a state misdemeanour. In line with Section 5 , it makes a misdemeanour for an unauthorised alien getting engaged or seeking for work in the State, the provision to this is enumerated in Section – 5C. There are two...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here