Carter, at age 20, paid $500 down and bought a car from A-1 Motors for $5,000. In the bill of sale, Carter certified that he was "21 years of age or older," (and thus of majority in this...

1 answer below »
Carter, at age 20, paid $500 down and bought a car from A-1 Motors for $5,000. In the bill of sale, Carter certified that he was "21 years of age or older," (and thus of majority in this jurisdiction). In fact, he told the salesperson he was 22. Carter took the car home but brought it back the next day for repairs. When A-1 failed to correct the problems, Carter had his attorney write the company to repudiate the contract and to demand the return of the down payment. Should Carter prevail? What if Carter had kept the car for 18 months before he had tried to repudiate the contract? Would your answer differ? Don't forget the Infancy Doctrine
Answered 129 days AfterOct 30, 2021

Answer To: Carter, at age 20, paid $500 down and bought a car from A-1 Motors for $5,000. In the bill of sale,...

Ananya answered on Mar 09 2022
116 Votes
Running Head: QUESTION ANSWER                            1
QUESTION ANSWER                                     3
QUESTION ANSWER
Table of Content
s
Question 1    3
Question 2    3
Question 1
No, Carter should not prevail in such case as it is an act of crime to hide one’s age to be allowed to purchase an object which has an age permit. Carter was only 20 years of age when he claimed to be 22 years to buy the car. The faulty car now must not be returned by his demand of being a...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here