BUACC2603 – Corporate Accounting Semester 2, 2012 ASSIGNMENT Assessment weight: 25% Due Date: Week 10 Length:1000 words Group Assignment: 2 people Format: Part A - Report Part B - Consolidated worksheet and journals Part A – (15%) AASB 116 allows an entity to choose either the Cost Model or the Revaluation Model for valuation of an entire class of assets (paragraph 29). The Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of your company (a medium sized listed, limited company in Australia) has asked you and your colleague to prepare a report for the Board of Directors of the company, explaining the features of the two options, comparing these and coming up with your recommendations for adoption of one of these models for subsequent recognition of its Plant & Machinery, and Land & Buildings. Required: Prepare a report for the Board, not exceeding 1000 words, on the two models, strictly following the University’s policies on referencing and plagiarism. Assessment criteria 1000 words max.Excellent (HD)Very Good (D)Good (C)Satisfactory (P)Unsatisfactory (F)1. Introduction (10)2. Body/Discussion (30) Critical evaluation of topic3. Recommendation/s (10) Conclusion (5)4. Examples (10)6. Referencing, citations (5)7. Evidence of reading, quality and quantity (10)8. English expression, coherence, grammar and spelling. Logical flow of ideas (10) 90/6 = 15% Part B – 10% On 1 July 2008, Melbourne Ltd acquired all the share capital of Sydney Ltd for $472,000. At that date, Sydney Ltd.’s equity consisted of the following: Share capital$ 300,000 General reserve 96,000 Retained earnings 56,000 At 1 July, all the identifiable assets and liabilities of Sydney Ltd were recorded at fair value. Financial information for Melbourne Ltd and Sydney Ltd for the year ended 30 June 2012 is presented in the left-hand columns of the worksheet. It is assumed that both companies use the...
Already registered? Login
Not Account? Sign up
Enter your email address to reset your password
Back to Login? Click here