Brunyé et al. (2008) examined the accuracy with which people could understand spatial representations from descriptions that were presented either in survey-perspective form or in route-perspective form. They used regression to examine whether the time spent reading the description (in seconds) would predict the response time (in milliseconds) to questions about the descriptions. They state:
There was strong evidence that increases in route description reading times predicted .... response times [β = = 0.03, t(18) = - 2.11, p 0.05].
Note that the degrees of freedom for the t test statistic are shown within parentheses.
(a) What is the implication of the negative slope?
(b) Give a 95% confidence interval for the expected change in response time, if reading time increases by 20 seconds.
(c) Calculate r2. Is reading time an accurate predictor of individual response times?
Already registered? Login
Not Account? Sign up
Enter your email address to reset your password
Back to Login? Click here