Briefing assignment You will be responsible for writing briefs foreachcaselisted on the syllabus for a given week. Briefs should be 1-1.5 pages (generally~ XXXXXXXXXXwords, though length will depend...

1 answer below »

Briefing assignment


You will be responsible for writing briefs foreachcaselisted on the syllabus for a given week. Briefs should be 1-1.5 pages (generally~400-500 words, though length will depend on the complexity of the case), andshould demonstrate your understanding of both the specific details of the case as well as the larger constitutional issues at stake. A good brief is an excellent study tool. It forces you to summarize and analyze a complicated case, to isolate the key features, and then to express them in your own words.



This assignment may be doneindividuallyor ingroups of up to five people. The choice is yours.



Each individual or group should turn in the briefs for the associated weekbeforeclass on the assigned day. This may be done via email (preferred) or by bringing a paper copy to class.








CASE FOR ASSIGNMENT : US V. MORRISON



1. Issue(s)


What is the centrallegalquestion addressed in this case? That is: what constitutional provision is at stake.


2. Facts of the case


A brief summary of the facts that brought the parties to court. This section can be quite brief. Do not spend more than 3-4 sentences here)


3. Holding


What was the decision of the court?


4. Reasoning


What was the basis for the decision?Howdid the court answer the key question, and what issues were they required to resolve in order to reach their conclusion? How did this decision fit into the existing caselaw (if any) on the subject (i.e. – what precedent did they engage)?


Generallythis section should focus on themajority opinion, but if there are important concurring or dissenting opinions, you should cover those as well.


5. Discussion


What are the larger implications of this decision? What political, social, or economic factors may have contributed to the Court’s approach? Is this decision still regarded as good precedent?


Answered Same DayApr 14, 2021

Answer To: Briefing assignment You will be responsible for writing briefs foreachcaselisted on the syllabus for...

Ishika answered on Apr 14 2021
153 Votes
Case Brief
Case: “United States v Morrison et al 529 US 598 (2000)”
Facts:
"Christo Brzonkala," Sexuall
y abused by two friends, "James Crawford and Antonio Morrison," a student at the “Virginia Polytechnic Institute and the State University”. None of these people were successfully tried or convicted; Morrison was briefly removed from university – though he admitted to engaging in the abuse – and Crawford left without any penalty or effect. "Brzonkala" pursued justice by citing the “Violence Against Women Act 1994”, established primarily to help and include the perpetrators of sexual abuse. In compliance with the Violence Against Women Act 1994, "Brzonkala" sued D and the University, establishing a private right to sue for damages in the cases concerned
Issue:
1. When has an activity a significant relationship with the interstate commerce?
2. Can Congress, under section 5 to the 14th amendment, regulate private behavior?
3. Is the law passed really an abuse of power to help victims bring their attackers to justice?
Holdings:
Factors that should be...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here